And easy to say now but I would've tried to push a couple of overs out of Travis Head. Siddle ideally bowls over 18 and 20, best death bowler in the team by a fair margin.
Pretty amazing Short got away with bowling 4 overs so many times
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And easy to say now but I would've tried to push a couple of overs out of Travis Head. Siddle ideally bowls over 18 and 20, best death bowler in the team by a fair margin.
Renshaw with a one way ticket to Snowtown.
Close enough.Kerr will get a match-winning tonne now.
yeah im surprised. those darty slow bowlers are gold when they get it rightAnd easy to say now but I would've tried to push a couple of overs out of Travis Head. Siddle ideally bowls over 18 and 20, best death bowler in the team by a fair margin.
Obviously we've seen better death bowlers for sure but I think Sids should have just let him go.If he’s bowling at the death it’s never ending well
Or Cartwright or Sams as a smoky that can bat down the order and clear the boundary from the outset
Exploiting uncommon rules to gain an advantage and change the outcome is fair according to the rule book but it’s a bit of a scummy move to win a final imo. They sent the bloke out there to begin with, live with itToo many morons on here who don’t know the rules of the game and are now whinging when a team uses the rules to their advantage. Pathetic.
Obviously we've seen better death bowlers for sure but I think Sids should have just let him go.
Exploiting uncommon rules to gain an advantage and change the outcome is fair according to the rule book but it’s a bit of a scummy move to win a final imo. They sent the bloke out there to begin with, live with it
Kerr might not be a bad choice to develop too.Or Cartwright or Sams as a smoky that can bat down the order and clear the boundary from the outset
I would personally give each team a maximum of 2 tactical retirements for them to use (or not use) during their innings as they see fit.I honestly hope more batsmen in T20's will retire themselves when they know their innings is a detriment on the team's efforts.
About the same as Carey I reckon.
Has anyone ever done it in this context though? Like I said, it’s fair according to the rules but it’s a bit of a shitty move to pull to win a gameYou are allowed to retire out it happens literally every tour game
Retire then potentially come back?I would personally give each team a maximum of 2 tactical retirements for them to use (or not use) during their innings as they see fit.
Has anyone ever done it in this context though? Like I said, it’s fair according to the rules but it’s a bit of a shitty move to pull to win a game
I think once you retire you should be out - it's only a 20-over gameRetire then potentially come back?
If it wasn’t for international rules not allowing runners for injured batsmen, we wouldn’t be talking about this.
Silk would’ve been allowed a runner
For good reason too, that rule was exploited badlyIf it wasn’t for international rules not allowing runners for injured batsmen, we wouldn’t be talking about this.
Silk would’ve been allowed a runner
Then you start getting into baseball pinch hitter type stuff.I would personally give each team a maximum of 2 tactical retirements for them to use (or not use) during their innings as they see fit.
That's direct from his mouthWorrall was our best bowler last season
For good reason too, that rule was exploited badly
They played an injured player, should not have been allowed a sub fielder
I don’t mind sending a bloke back out after he’s injured himself in his innings but I don’t reckon you should get the option if he’s already injured, that’s their fault for taking the gamble on him (hard to police obviously).Happened on occasions it’s rare but sometimes