- Oct 27, 2016
- 5,932
- 10,592
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Packers, Raptors, Renegades
This thread is identity politics at its finest
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope - would just mean suddenly there aren't any houses with more than 5 people in them. And that would create higher demand for new housing. Which would lead to higher property values. Which would inflate the market and further increase the widening gap between wages and home costs, artificially creating a massive new lower class full of younger generations. There would be chaos on the streets, rule of law would break down and absolutely zero more indigenous coaches, making it totally pointless.Always thought we should apply a similar rule to residential housing. ie. If your household has 5 or more members you are required to house 1 indigenous members.
It would solve our national diversity crises as well as solve our indigenous poverty issue too.
Hird walking into the Giants job with media and AFL seal of approval seems like a fitting time to bump this thread and topic. Of course the media won't dare bring it up when the incoming coach is one they approve of.
Maybe this narrative will conveniently get attached to Port's replacement for Ken or Gold Coast's replacement for Dew instead of what's going to happen at the Giants, an actual case of privilege and protecting the boys club.
Do you have someone in mind who fits your criteria?Hird walking into the Giants job with media and AFL seal of approval seems like a fitting time to bump this thread and topic. Of course the media won't dare bring it up when the incoming coach is one they approve of.
Maybe this narrative will conveniently get attached to Port's replacement for Ken or Gold Coast's replacement for Dew instead of what's going to happen at the Giants, an actual case of privilege and protecting the boys club.
Which indigenous coaches have missed out on jobs?
Trouble is people usually think the "best person for the job" is someone like them.Here's a novel idea - employ the best person for the job regardless of race, gender or sexual preference. Nah, that won't satisfy the woke brigade.
Eddie Betts too.Great post by the OP.
This was a serious issue back in 2017.
Some definite progress since then ?
Neville Jetta and X Clarke for starters.
It's better than having a quota.Trouble is people usually think the "best person for the job" is someone like them.
Just human nature.
It's better than having a quota.
I've spent over 30 years in a public sector department where they now have a quota of 50% of managerial positions need to be filled by women. F'kn WHY??!!
If they're good enough fill 100% of the positions with women FFS. But let's not sit back and accept that a better candidate misses out because he's got a dick!!
No wonder the country is heading down the slippery slope.
If they're good enough fill 100% of the positions with women FFS.
Given Hird has terrible credentials, at least one job was missed out on.
By who?