Kings of the State
Team Captain
- Apr 27, 2022
- 482
- 704
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Banned
- #3,976
What's the story with Motlop, Freo and Carlton?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
the story is f uck carltonWhat's the story with Motlop, Freo and Carlton?
Sure he is a little behind on his development but how many players have second year blues? He's a 19 year old rookie who has kicked as many goals as the top KPFS taken from his draft year. Let's give him every chance to succeed!A failure at 19.....
Ok then.
Yer that really doesn't answer my questionthe story is f uck carlton
It’s insane isn’t it.It does my head in that some are happy to let Logue go. Absolutely a required player.
Gets accused of being an athlete and not a footballer. Got 29 on the weekend. That's a footballer's return.It’s insane isn’t it.
Are you watching curnow tearing the Sydney defence apart right now?
Yet Logue is apparently not needed at freo.
A depth player would be Joel Hamling. Ethan Hughes.The last couple of weeks? So has Josh Treacy.
My point is he’s too good to be depth at an AFL club whether that’s here or somewhere else. He’s a best 22 level player who’ll be offered that level of money, maybe better, by other clubs.
My point was that the argument that we need to keep all of our KPDs so we have enough depth is slightly flawed. The system is designed so it’s very difficult to keep players good enough to be best 22 but aren’t best 22 on your list. This applies to any team that has an abundance of quality in any area tbh. Logue, if he’s behind Pearce and Cox would be the best player in the league that is the third best KPD on their list.
He’s been dropped twice this season which is likely a large reason why he’s not considering offers right at this moment. Either he plays every week from now on or he’ll probably leave imo.
It does my head in that some are happy to let Logue go. Absolutely a required player.
Yeah THAT'S why we don't have motlop. Because he was too raw. No other reasonMotlop looks good, I f*n told y'all but apparently he was too raw.
There are some here who seem fine with Logue leaving.Who’s saying that? Out of the 3 KPDs in Logue, Cox and Pearce where do you rate Logue? I think Cox is the most talented out of the three, has the potential to be McGovern-like. Pearce, I still have ahead of Logue and he’s always been under appreciated because he fluffs a kick here and there.
Meh, I’m done with this Logue talk. Too many people take it the wrong way.
That's what posters were saying on here.Yeah THAT'S why we don't have motlop. Because he was too raw. No other reason
We never had a chance Jako unless we didn’t draft Matt Johnson.That's what posters were saying on here.
There are some here who seem fine with Logue leaving.
I agree I think Cox is our most creative defender, though Chapman is catching him. Pearce always seems a game away from a season ending ankle injury.
Logue's versatile. He's played 50 games. Pretty much every defender in the league fluffs the odd kick. Logue's usually pretty tidy.
Actually we gave up Clark for him. Not to mention if we actually got fair compo for Cez we probably could have landed him. Ah well.We never had a chance Jako unless we didn’t draft Matt Johnson.
Probably one of the worst takes I’ve seen here in some time.I don’t trust players who have their best year in contract years , plus we’ve put a lot of games into him and carried him through plenty of injuries and now he wants to duck off because he’s left out a couple of times for team balance
duck him
Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com
Who’s saying that? Out of the 3 KPDs in Logue, Cox and Pearce where do you rate Logue? I think Cox is the most talented out of the three, has the potential to be McGovern-like. Pearce, I still have ahead of Logue and he’s always been under appreciated because he fluffs a kick here and there.
Meh, I’m done with this Logue talk. Too many people take it the wrong way.
Obviously wants to stay. It shouldn't be too hard to keep him if the club is serious. He'll play pretty much every game unless his form drops. Too good to leave out.I don’t trust players who have their best year in contract years , plus we’ve put a lot of games into him and carried him through plenty of injuries and now he wants to duck off because he’s left out a couple of times for team balance
duck him
Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com
Probably one of the worst takes I’ve seen here in some time.
The guy literally did an interview two days ago pleading with the club to sign him, that he wants to stay on.
Colin YoungSo where’s all the Logues getable stuff coming from ….. I don’t watch any MSM
Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com
You are right not to follow MSM but watch this and make up your own mindSo where’s all the Logues getable stuff coming from ….. I don’t watch any MSM
Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com
I don’t trust players who have their best year in contract years , plus we’ve put a lot of games into him and carried him through plenty of injuries and now he wants to duck off because he’s left out a couple of times for team balance
duck him
Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com
The Dees are able to keep Ben Brown, sam weideman, Tom Mcdonald and Bailey Fritsch all on the list and competing hard for spots while winning flags.This post is a little harsh for me but it’s exactly why he’d leave.
He’d be guaranteed best 22 at most teams and dropping him for team balance would never have been a consideration. Here he has been borderline but probably isn’t now
Money wise other clubs will pay a guaranteed best 22 player better money. It’s how the system is supposed to work. We’ll need to work harder to keep Logue. That involves finding a way to fit him into the side and paying him market rate.
No one here is saying the club would decide to trade Logue but as an out of contract player the club can’t lowball him.