This is the type of embarrassing reply that is a big part of the issue. Please think about the words "Perhaps we need to ask ourselves, why are we following the FAILED German model which is high CO2, high security of supply risk, expensive, unreliable and carries massive geo-political risk."
Why compare Australia to Germany? Surely a sensible response would be to compare Germany to successful jurisdictions.
what is Germany's CO2 per kwh vs France, Tasmania, Ontario, Sweden, Norway and every other successful nation?
This is why Germany's $1.5 trillion 45 years model is a failure..............especially when successful nations achieved their goal half a century ago