Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Watching the Bushies vs the Pioneers right now and I can tell you Ollie Hollands is an absolute gun runner with an inside/outside game...but his kicking is average at best. I'll also tell you now if Harley Reid doesn't go top 3 or 4 next year I'll eat my hat.Exactly !!
I don’t know, is it the Josh Dunkley board?George, which Boards do you think I moderate .....and what do we discuss incessantly ??
Who has the better disposal, Dunkley or Tarranto ? .....why does Dunkley play a large proportion of games as a FWD ?
Dunkleys ten times the player Keay’s is..Nope, it's the view of the majority of neutral avid footy watchers on the boards
You criticise our players, like Keays for his disposal .....yet you're keen to bring another in, with poor disposal
We need a classy finisher, not another grunge player .....we don't have to chase a player, simply because he's available
You watch Dunkley end up at port for a cheap second round pick.. then he’ll tear us a new one in the first showdown in 2023.. and once again.. we’ll get crickets chirping from all the Keays apologists in here..I don’t know, is it the Josh Dunkley board?
I’m not saying he is elite, I said he is a decent midfielder and our midfield sucks, it needs more than just one classy mid.
Do you think Dunkley would get a game in most teams midfields in the comp?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Depends on the team's midfield mix ......teams I think could use Dunkley: WCE, RICH, ESS & PORTDo you think Dunkley would get a game in most teams midfields in the comp?
Another that's weakness is his disposal by foot.Laird cops a bit of s**t around here but IMO he's better than Dunkley quite easily
When they play him forward like WB did with Dunkley is because they have few goal scoring options and both of them have a forward craft unlike most of there other mids.It's why GWS have played him predominantly FWD ....Taranto wants to play midfield, RICH / COLL provide that opportunity
Put Dunkley into Ports midfield & surround him with Butters & Rozee ....it's a perfect mix of grunt and class
If you're going to have midfielder with average to poor disposal by foot in the side I'd want high accumulation, clearances and defensive work which Laird provides much more of than someone like Dunkley.Another that's weakness is his disposal by foot.
Of course you'd take Dunkley if he was available at his true value both draft collateral and salary wise but he's not the messiah.....and he's certainly not worth a top 10 pick. If it was a choice between Dunkley and Phillipou I'm running the gauntlet and passing on Dunkley.
The Dawson trade has given me confidence we can get Rankine and keep our first.
Imagine Laird as your third midfielder like Viney, Edwards or even Dunkley and you got Martin and Cotchin or Oliver and Petracca or Bont and Macrae along side him.Laird cops a bit of s**t around here but IMO he's better than Dunkley quite easily
Pretty much. We need to find our Martin or PetraccaImagine Laird as your third midfielder like Viney, Edwards or even Dunkley and you got Martin and Cotchin or Oliver and Petracca or Bont and Macrae along side him.
Happy days
No one has suggested he is the messiah. He’s a decent mid that would make our midfield better because it’s one of the worst in the comp. I’m also not suggesting using our first pick on him and I don’t think Port will be eitherAnother that's weakness is his disposal by foot.
Of course you'd take Dunkley if he was available at his true value both draft collateral and salary wise but he's not the messiah.....and he's certainly not worth a top 10 pick. If it was a choice between Dunkley and Phillipou I'm running the gauntlet and passing on Dunkley.
OR Sam Berry and Luke PedlarIf you're going to have midfielder with average to poor disposal by foot in the side I'd want high accumulation, clearances and defensive work which Laird provides much more of than someone like Dunkley.
I wouldn't go out of my way to add Dunkley to a team with Laird already
No your not, you and Hamish are going for the gut running 180cm battler whose not overly quick and going to struggle to hit a barn door from 20m as long as hes from a good family with leadership skills.Another that's weakness is his disposal by foot.
Of course you'd take Dunkley if he was available at his true value both draft collateral and salary wise but he's not the messiah.....and he's certainly not worth a top 10 pick. If it was a choice between Dunkley and Phillipou I'm running the gauntlet and passing on Dunkley.
Dubkley not a decent mid? Please.Except, Dunkley is not a decent mid .....you obviously haven't watched him play, or you wouldn't have this opinion
This is a "grass is greener" comment by you
Hamish had to select him, that’s on him.
Dunkley is a good player, I think we have his type of style in the midfield with Berry and Schoenberg. We need that x-factor that resembles a Bont or Trac.
Why not?

IMO ....Disposal, and Marking .....for a junior he also exhibits good composure, in that he weighs up his options, rather than throwing the ball on his bootWaynesWorld19 and Mutineer , what would you say Phillipou's best attributes would be?