Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2022 Trade & List Management Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I actually think it’d be a pretty easy sell job for Clark from Alastair. “Look at all these players we have in the same age bracket as you, our window is going to be in a couple years and we need a HBF. Whilst what is the Saints window?”.

The fact he’s contracted makes it a little harder, but if we can somehow include hill and take his contract, a second will get it done.
 
Clark’s foot skills are appealing, but he has had an awful run with injury hasn’t he? (Few concussions too I believe). I wouldn’t be giving up too much.

We are obviously planning on shifting a few onto the rookie list from the main list, otherwise not sure where these list spots are going to magically appear from if we are in for all these blokes.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Griffin Logue = The Door
 
Which of these would be considered redundant?

As in, would the dream be Logue, Bruhn, Tucker and just one of Clark/Long/Hill?

If you get Clark, I don't think you need Long and if you get Tucker I don't think you need Hill,even though they are different type of players.

Would Clark be part of a Hll salary dump?

If we did get Clark it would give us 4,6,7 and 11 from the 2017 draft.
 
The only way we get any of these deals done is through trading one of or both of the following:

1. Pick 1 in the 2022 national draft
2. Tarryn Thomas
 
If you get Clark, I don't think you need Long and if you get Tucker I don't think you need Hill,even though they are differeent type of players.

Would Clark be part of a Hll salary dump?

If we did get Clark it would give us 4,6,7 and 11 from the 2017 draft.
And 20.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The only way we get any of these deals done is through trading one of or both of the following:

1. Pick 1 in the 2022 national draft
2. Tarryn Thomas
Steve Harvey Reaction GIF
 
The only way we get any of these deals done is through trading one of or both of the following:

1. Pick 1 in the 2022 national draft
2. Tarryn Thomas
I can see us splitting 1,

Then with PPs coming in using them and a mix of future picks to methodically get what we need
 
I hate to break your bubble mate, but we are gonna get next to nothing in way of priority picks
Even without a PP, your suggestion that we cannot get any of those deals done without trading Pick 1 or Tarryn, is f*kn ludicrous.

Logue, Brunh or Clark could be traded for a future second. That's one done, so you're already wrong.

Our future first could also be used (although I'm not keen to do this), to acquire the other two. So you're wrong again.

Tucker, Long & Hill on 900k are late picks, this or next year.

As I said, f*kn ludicrous.

Also, the general consensus within AFL circles, is we will get Pick 19 PP as a minimum, so guess what? You're wrong again, good work.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top