Remove this Banner Ad

Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham - Statement from Barham addressing Merrett etc - 12/9

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
 
Last edited:
That sorta suggests you do believe Thorburn was part of the reason they rejected us?

Regardless of why he left we lost two CEOs. Just sayin'. It's not any one thing specifically, rather the entirety of the shitfest that we have been that makes us unattractive.
 
Regardless of why he left we lost two CEOs. Just sayin'. It's not any one thing specifically, rather the entirety of the shitfest that we have been that makes us unattractive.
Right. So you do think Thorburn contributed which makes this post odd.
I didn't say they did.
And I disagree since it happened after the trade period started.

Which means really it's the coaching mess, which Carlton also had. They're not totally incomparable situations. Carlton had the Lyon appointment backflip element that we didn't have for instance.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Regardless of why he left we lost two CEOs. Just sayin'. It's not any one thing specifically, rather the entirety of the shitfest that we have been that makes us unattractive.

Its-the-vibe-your-honour-The-castle.gif
 
Right. So you do think Thorburn contributed which makes this post odd.

And I disagree since it happened after the trade period started.

Which means really it's the coaching mess, which Carlton also had. They're not totally incomparable situations. Carlton had the Lyon appointment backflip element that we didn't have for instance.

Maybe it's bias, but I don't recall the AFL media death riding every single move Carlton made the way they have with Essendon.
 
Regardless of why he left we lost two CEOs. Just sayin'. It's not any one thing specifically, rather the entirety of the shitfest that we have been that makes us unattractive.

It is more being a basket case under Knights -> Controversy with the Hird/Thompson appointment -> OMG there is light at the end of the tunnel -> No it is very very dark -> to basket case on the field -> Unimpressive older coach -> messy change over -> Covid and we're shit AGAIN -> Rebuild -> messy change of coach at start of rebuild.
 
Right. So you do think Thorburn contributed which makes this post odd.

And I disagree since it happened after the trade period started.

Which means really it's the coaching mess, which Carlton also had. They're not totally incomparable situations. Carlton had the Lyon appointment backflip element that we didn't have for instance.

Ok. :)
 
It is more being a basket case under Knights -> Controversy with the Hird/Thompson appointment -> OMG there is light at the end of the tunnel -> No it is very very dark -> to basket case on the field -> Unimpressive older coach -> messy change over -> Covid and we're s**t AGAIN -> Rebuild -> messy change of coach at start of rebuild.

so you are saying its not a string of separate multiple heck ups that we dont learn from, its more one big decades long heck up?

thats far easier to digest
 

Remove this Banner Ad

If little somehow gets back in the chair I’m almost done with this club.
It’s purely disruption to what Barham has started.

A new board will do nothing and we’ll be back to square one. Who is allegedly contacting Little? It has Sheedy written all over it. Probably sour from Barham getting one over him not hiring Hird.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

2 Presidents and 3 CEOs in the space of 3 months is shambolic but 3 Presidents and 3 CEOs is actually almost mind-bending, particularly for the hoops they have to jump through to even get to that point.

Essendon Football Club has an even worse form of board entrenchment, with members only getting to elect six of the 10 directors for three-year terms, with the other four simply being appointed if more than 66% of the incumbent directors support the move.

However, Barham is only two years into his three-year term, so he won’t face election at the upcoming December AGM. Critics will need to call an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) to remove him from the board, but these seven incumbent directors could choose to roll him as president at any point.

Rich Lister Andrew Muir, who hails from the family that built and then sold The Good Guys to JB Hi-Fi for an eye-popping $870 million in 2016, is reportedly the only internal candidate up for the presidential role.

But given the soap opera of the past seven weeks since the presidential coup, the Bombers probably need a clean skin to take charge, such as Peter Costello. Alternatively, they could bring back one of their past presidents, such as Lindsay Tanner or Toll Holdings founder Paul Little, a bit like the way Jeff Kennett had a second crack at the Hawthorn presidency.

Little is the name being widely canvassed in the press. But even to be appointed to the board in the lead-up to the December AGM, he needs five of the seven existing directors to agree to satisfy that unusual two-thirds requirement in the constitution.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top