-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Transfer discussion thread
- Thread starter Bojan KantKick
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
Who's a better player - Mount or Maddison?
Both English with one year left on their contract. Only two years apart in age.
I feel like 65m is too much for Mount and 50m is about right for Maddison but no one wants to pay that price. I think Spurs will try and negotiate down to 40m for Maddison.
Chelsea seems to be pretty stubborn on the Mount price.
Both English with one year left on their contract. Only two years apart in age.
I feel like 65m is too much for Mount and 50m is about right for Maddison but no one wants to pay that price. I think Spurs will try and negotiate down to 40m for Maddison.
Chelsea seems to be pretty stubborn on the Mount price.
TheGreatBarryB
Hall of Famer
Considering he had one year left on his contract and club was relegated..no way Maddison is worth £50m. But with clubs throwing silly money about who knows. I would’ve thought £35-40m for Maddison is pretty reasonable
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Depends if you value work rate and athleticism vs quality on the ball I suppose.
krakouers
Certified with Bonz Tick of Approval
- Sep 13, 2011
- 22,510
- 46,556
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Claremont
I guess that fire was extinguished…
- Moderator
- #9,338
- Moderator
- #9,339
- Aug 21, 2016
- 19,292
- 33,060
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Oldham
I'd rate them about the same. Mount is more flexible and works harder. Maddison is more skillful and takes a good free kick.
I agree £65m is too much for Mount. Chelsea need to sell players and no one else seems to be interested. Maddison's fee will depend on which clubs are interested. Spurs and Newcastle have been mentioned. Spurs can't offer him Champions League.
Harvey Barnes will probably be on the move too. £35m maybe?
- Dec 22, 2009
- 73,184
- 48,656
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Matildas/Socceroos/LFC/MVFC/RCStrasbourg
Man Utd surely should just go as far as 50m and leave it at that. Not like Mount wants to stay or has anyone else chasing him plus he will be worth bugger all in Jan window.
Bojan KantKick
Hall of Famer
- Thread starter
- #9,343
He's your best player
- Moderator
- #9,344
A lot of money for two.guys who have been in terrible form over the last 18 months.
Bit of a gamble, were they in bad form or are they just a bit shit.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Moderator
- #9,345
Theres only £8m between whats offered and what will be accepted, it'll get done. United will want to get their number 1 target soted before preseason starts.
Bojan KantKick
Hall of Famer
- Thread starter
- #9,346
Your whole club has been shit for 18 months. Can't blame the players for the club imploding.
Bojan KantKick
Hall of Famer
- Thread starter
- #9,347
He's never been our number 1 target. Where do you get this stuff from.
- Dec 22, 2009
- 73,184
- 48,656
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Matildas/Socceroos/LFC/MVFC/RCStrasbourg
Hed be your best player.
Bojan KantKick
Hall of Famer
- Thread starter
- #9,349
Bojan KantKick
Hall of Famer
- Thread starter
- #9,350
Who Mount? Nah. Good player and he'll get to United now or in 12 months.
- Status
Similar threads
