Rafael Nadal appreciation thread

[mrs_richo]

why dont you start following someone for real, other than being a bandwagoner.Funny how you never post when fed loses

I have better things to do than spending all my time online. Nadal has got to be the WORST exponent of gamesmanship ( and im not the only person who thinks that either). You will be bowing at Roger's feet after sunday when he gets 5 in a row.

 

[Total Power]

I have better things to do than spending all my time online. Nadal has got to be the WORST exponent of gamesmanship ( and im not the only person who thinks that either). You will be bowing at Roger's feet after sunday when he gets 5 in a row.

Funny, how you are online virtually everyday but you dont post here. Typical bandwagoner.Worst exponent of gamesmanship?? can you give me an example bandwagoner? bowing down at rogers feet like roger bowed down at nadals feet last month you mean???

 

[Thrawn]

bowing down at rogers feet like roger bowed down at nadals feet last month you mean???

You know, I have nothing against Nadal but...

I'm starting to dislike him soley because of you.

 

[Total Power]

You know, I have nothing against Nadal but...

I'm starting to dislike him soley because of you.

never noticed federer fans arrogance??

 

[mr_cellotape]

never noticed federer fans arrogance??

10 grand slam wins to 3 will do that. Justifiably so.

 

[Total Power]

10 grand slam wins to 3 will do that. Justifiably so.

i mean federer fans, not federers.Some of the federer fans are not only the biggest bandwagoners but biggest tools as well

 

[mr_cellotape]

i mean federer fans, not federers.Some of the federer fans are not only the biggest bandwagoners but biggest tools as well

Yeah I know. I'm sure you're right about the bandwagoners aspect, but I can understand why people find it laughable that Nadal gets so much hype considering Federer's success. Though people who use any excuse to tear down Nadal and are just as bad.

 

[Total Power]

Yeah I know. I'm sure you're right about the bandwagoners aspect, but I can understand why people find it laughable that Nadal gets so much hype considering Federer's success. Though people who use any excuse to tear down Nadal and are just as bad.

cause he is the only guy who is capable of beating federer on any surface other than grass courts.On a hardcourt its always 50/50. On clay nadal has the obvious edge and on grass federer has the edge

 

[ICanDressMyself]

Great loss by the Fed-killer

Federer just too good, shits over every other tennis player including the Fed-loser-to-erer

 

[Ricketts]

The only bandwagon is the Total Power Anti Roger Federer Bandwagon.

 

[Total Power]

Great loss by the Fed-killer

Federer just too good, shits over every other tennis player including the Fed-loser-to-erer

8>5 .Shits other every player so much that he almost got done on his favourite surface by a dud on grass

 

[Total Power]

The only bandwagon is the Total Power Anti Roger Federer Bandwagon.

much better than being a bandwagoner. Watch federer fans leave when he starts to lose

 

[Hot Spenny]

much better than being a bandwagoner. Watch federer fans leave when he starts to lose

Looks like ill be on it till he retires then.

 

[ICanDressMyself]

8>5 .Shits other every player so much that he almost got done on his favourite surface by a dud on grass

Yeah but you don't think he's a dud so there's no reason why Nadal couldn't have beaten Fed. Just not good enough

I actually feel a bit sorry for Rafa actually, I really don't have that much against the guy but your bias and pure garbage that you post here has turned most of Bigfooty against him.

 

[Total Power]

Yeah but you don't think he's a dud so there's no reason why Nadal couldn't have beaten Fed. Just not good enough

I actually feel a bit sorry for Rafa actually, I really don't have that much against the guy but your bias and pure garbage that you post here has turned most of Bigfooty against him.

oh wow i am so worried about bigfooty why dont you go back and follow aussie rules and leave tennis to the people who actually follow tennis?

 

[ICanDressMyself]

oh wow i am so worried about bigfooty why dont you go back and follow aussie rules and leave tennis to the people who actually follow tennis?

So now I can't follow tennis

Yes sir Mr. Total Power internet dude sir

 

[Total Power]

So now I can't follow tennis

Yes sir Mr. Total Power internet dude sir

you dont follow tennis its obvious. A guy playing his 2nd wimbledon, almost beat federer, and you feel sorry for him?? tell me one player who can do that to federer? like i said, get a clue about tennis

 

[ICanDressMyself]

you dont follow tennis its obvious. A guy playing his 2nd wimbledon, almost beat federer, and you feel sorry for him?? tell me one player who can do that to federer? like i said, get a clue about tennis

why do you always argue when people have different opinions to yours?

YOU get a clue and learn that people have their OWN opinions.

 

[Total Power]

why do you always argue when people have different opinions to yours?

YOU get a clue and learn that people have their OWN opinions.

what is this forum for??? this is a place to discuss different opinions. Fair enough if u disagree with me, but you cannot disagree that nadal has now closed the gap considerably on federer.Federer is still the champion no doubt, but i am a happy nadal fan, a bit of mental toughness and he can make it

 

[Hot Spenny]

Total Power, do you follow anybody else on the tour, or you just stick to the one guy?

 

[Ricketts]

you dont follow tennis its obvious. A guy playing his 2nd wimbledon, almost beat federer, and you feel sorry for him?? tell me one player who can do that to federer? like i said, get a clue about tennis

But i thought he was the Fed Killer.

 

[mr_cellotape]

Fair enough if u disagree with me

Huh? Everyone who's disagreed with you, you've dismissed as "knowing nothing about tennis". Seems you don't think it's "fair enough" that people disagree with you at all.

 

[Total Power]

Huh? Everyone who's disagreed with you, you've dismissed as "knowing nothing about tennis". Seems you don't think it's "fair enough" that people disagree with you at all.

do you disagree that rafa was better on baseline rallies? more winners and less unforced errors and more forced errors is the proof.

 

[Total Power]

But i thought he was the Fed Killer.

on his least preferred surface he stretched fed all the way on his favourite surface.Can federer do that to rafa on clay? obviously not.Bring on the hardcourt season

 

[mr_cellotape]

do you disagree that rafa was better on baseline rallies?

Of course I don't dispute that.

But you can't take that fact and then extrapolate it to claim that he was "the better player" as you've done here ad nauseum. As people have tried to get through to you - also ad nauseum, and seemingly with little to no success - is that the better player was Federer, the winner, the guy who didn't (dare I say it because of the barrage of whinging that it'll no doubt provoke) choke.