Toast All-Australian Lions in 2023

[Son of Superboot]

Meanwhile ................ have you seen the AFL Brownlow Predictor? While these are never 100% accurate, maybe its a repeat of 2010-2011.

 

[scott_the_man]

Neale:

#1 in competition for clearances
#3 for contested possessions
#5 coaches votes
5th favourite for Brownlow

Played a big part in getting us to 2nd position on the ladder.

Doesn't make the team yet Zac Merrett does. Kinda ridiculous.

 

[beatnik]

Here’s why only 1 Lion made AA…

 

[scott_the_man]

Here’s why only 1 Lion made AA…

The entire panel is Vic (?) apart from Jakovic who is from WA. Typical.

 

[beatnik]

The entire panel is Vic (?) apart from Jakovic who is from WA. Typical.

And Cornes…who ensured port had 3 players

 

[Nathan Barley]

Here’s why only 1 Lion made AA…

All those ex players apart from maybe Bolton come across in the media as having a huge bias for their former team

And they don't really hide it and it seems to just be accepted

 

[Nathan Barley]

The entire panel is Vic (?) apart from Jakovic who is from WA. Typical.

And he's the dumbest and most biased of the lot

 

[mpal6]

Meanwhile ................ have you seen the AFL Brownlow Predictor? While these are never 100% accurate, maybe its a repeat of 2010-2011.

View attachment 1790771

They'll find a way to get Brownlow to Bont.

It'll be another Chris Judd 3 votes.

 

[Tom14]

A few of our players were stiff but Merrett over Libba or Lachie Neale? Got to be kidding.

Yeah I think Libba was a bit more stiff than Lachie to be fair. He probably doesn't ever get an AA jumper now.

 

[Section 5]

A bit of incentive for Neale and Daniher to have a great finals series.

 

[Dalions]

A bit of incentive for Neale and Daniher to have a great finals series.

And Harris

 

[LongLion]

Meanwhile ................ have you seen the AFL Brownlow Predictor? While these are never 100% accurate, maybe its a repeat of 2010-2011.

View attachment 1790771

A lot of Neales votes come from Fish's voting and he is a fan of Lachie so might be a bit of unintended bias. Would love it to be right though.

 

[Thomasno]

A lot of Neales votes come from Fish's voting and he is a fan of Lachie so might be a bit of unintended bias. Would love it to be right though.

However he’s been quite open that the AFL journos were told to vote like they think the umpires would actually vote, not who they think should get votes; and to be fair we know the umpires love Lachie

 

[LongLion]

However he’s been quite open that the AFL journos were told to vote like they think the umpires would actually vote, not who they think should get votes; and to be fair we know the umpires love Lachie

Yep, I sure hope he has seen the games the same as the umps.

 

[fugitive]

Clearly not, ah well good for him, I still have bad Toby image in my head.

I guess you haven't been watching GWS much this season then.

 

[Zhesty]

I don't watch enough opposition games anymore to have a valid opinion on who shouldn't have made the team but I do think that none of our players had outstanding individual seasons so I can understand only having one make the team.

I personally thought Harris and Charlie were our best chances but didn't think both would make it.

Lachie had a slightly down year on his usual standard imo.

Danniher had his best year for us but going off goals I can see why others made it before him.

Harris was really good and had a better year than last year but I didn't think he was outstanding so again I can understand his omission.

Ultimately cases could be made for all 4 players but none were dead set certainties based off their year.

 

[luthor]

It might seem outrageous that none of Daniher, Andrews or Neale made the AA but I actually see it as a bonus.

All of them will be jumping out of their skins to prove the AA Selectors total arse clowns.

It will be a hoot when we play Melbourne in the GF with both sides having only one AA rep each

 

[alscotoz2]

I don't watch enough opposition games anymore to have a valid opinion on who shouldn't have made the team but I do think that none of our players had outstanding individual seasons so I can understand only having one make the team.

I personally thought Harris and Charlie were our best chances but didn't think both would make it.

Lachie had a slightly down year on his usual standard imo.

Danniher had his best year for us but going off goals I can see why others made it before him.

Harris was really good and had a better year than last year but I didn't think he was outstanding so again I can understand his omission.

Ultimately cases could be made for all 4 players but none were dead set certainties based off their year.

But his 'slightly down' is comfortably good enough. Maybe because I watch the lions every week, but he is a sensational player, moreso since he's added some goals to his game.

 

[Jivlain]

Defensive Player of the Year - Harris Andrews - The Mongrel Punt

Harris Andrews was a monster in the back half for the Brisbane Lions. He is fittingly rewarded with the Defensive Player of the Year Award

themongrelpunt.com

 

[Lets Roar like '44]

It might seem outrageous that none of Daniher, Andrews or Neale made the AA but I actually see it as a bonus.

All of them will be jumping out of their skins to prove the AA Selectors total arse clowns.

It will be a hoot when we play Melbourne in the GF with both sides having only one AA rep each

Players don’t actually think like this.

 

[HereIGoAgain]

Players don’t actually think like this.

I like to think that players do think like this. It has got to sting a bit to not have your efforts acknowledged and generally speaking athletes are competitive beasts so I'm sure that pride is an influence in performance.

 

[Lets Roar like '44]

I like to think that players do think like this. It has got to sting a bit to not have your efforts acknowledged and generally speaking athletes are competitive beasts so I'm sure that pride is an influence in performance.

I can assure you, they don’t.

 

[HereIGoAgain]

I can assure you, they don’t.

That is a fairly broad claim to make. Are you sure that there are no performances that are not, at least in part, motivated by pride?

 

[BuntonRules]

Every one is influenced by the information coming in. They will not be governed by it, but they will be aware of the snub.

 

[Grasshopper17]

That is a fairly broad claim to make. Are you sure that there are no performances that are not, at least in part, motivated by pride?

I would say that they are motivated partly from within, and partly from those around the club, who most likely set them various benchmarks etc and assess them on whether those are met. I'd be very surprised (and a bit concerned actually) if they placed any store in what a bunch of talking heads in Melbourne think of them.