Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The top 3 in this year's b&f; plus dual b&f winner Mark Blicavs.I'm a fan of your posts for the most part, but gee you're going early here.
There's an argument to be made that we've already improved our hand on what we would have gotten last year. Port's offer was a pick in the mid 30s, and that was before NGA/FS bids.
25 is a good pick. Not a great pick, but a pick in a range that has produced a gazillion quality AFL footballers over the journey.
We're not talking about building through the rookie draft here like you appear to be making out.
Just off the top of my head, these players have been selected from pick 25 onwards.
- Chad Warner
- Robbie Gray
- Luke Shuey
- Jai Newcombe (MSD)
- Steve Johnson
- Jeremy McGovern
- Sam Mitchell
- Mark LeCras
- Corey Enright
- Tom Stewart
- Jack Crisp
- Tex Walker
- Matthew Stokes
- Simon Black
- Rory Sloane
- Touk Miller
- Sam Taylor
- Max Gawn
- Mitch Duncan
- Dean Cox
- Luke Parker
- Lachie Neale
- James Sicily
- Sean Darcy
- Gryan Miers
- Brad Close
- Tyson Stengle
- Jack Henry
- Michael Walters
- Zach Merrett
- Ollie Lord (Who's become the second coming of Wayne Carey over the last few weeks.)
To you maybe, sitting in an office now and the collective is that Geelong got more than he is worth. If you weren't a cats / port fan you weren't following as closely and its just another trade done on the final day.Mackie and the club came out looking like fools after all this
Again I ask - what should he have done differently? What is the was the outcome you were looking for?Mackie officially on a watch and act warning for me now as he takes over complete control of the list management, this was very poorly managed.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Trades are done..
So who will the Cats pick #8 and #25?
This is it.I guess it means those late picks will be before Port.
To you maybe, sitting in an office now and the collective is that Geelong got more than he is worth. If you weren't a cats / port fan you weren't following as closely and its just another trade done on the final day.
Again I ask - what should he have done differently? What is the was the outcome you were looking for?
You are seriously gnashing your teeth over a fairly inconsequential trade.
I'd take ZZ or C Edwards at 25 and back Stevens to slide.Pick 8 - Ryley Sanders
Pick 25 - George Stevens
Mackie said that they think by the time the GCS use all their picks to get those Academy players that pick 76 could drop down to a third-round pick. Also, the 8 & 25 could be packaged.
Mackie said that they think by the time the GCS use all their picks to get those Academy players that pick 76 could drop down to a third-round pick and 94 to a 4th round.
Pick 8 - Ryley Sanders
Pick 25 - George Stevens
How much junior football have you watched? Serious question.Disappointed we caved. I would have wanted the fr2 richmond got and nor 25 because i dont rate this draft.
Unless we have some other trade planned i dont see the point of picks 76 and 94 as we had picks in the 80s/100s that will come into the 50s anyway and i doubt we use more than 3-4 picks so those are picks we wont use unless we are ontrading them.
Listening to Mackie I was of the impression we're going to trade pick 8.Sounds very unlikely we will be using those picks in their current form.
You all have to remember the big end of town (AFL) always wants the 'big' name deals done on the last day, this was probably all worked out on day 1. /s
Getting ass blasted in a prelim was your teams best result this millennium.Mackie worse than Adrian Dodoro
I think Sav is a spud. Port have gone all in with average players and wasted 3 years of draft picks. It'll backfire.The majority of the footy world thinks 25 is fair if not overs for Esava and I agree. Junk picks are inconsequential.
I am an unashamed Esava fan and I can’t make an argument that he’d be best 22 even if he stayed in 2024.
Good luck to him, I’m sure he’ll propel Port from straight sets to a home prelim smashing![]()
After listening to Mackie on TR I have zero doubt we are wanting Sanders.
Mackie kind of mentioned we could use 8 + 25 maybe as I have questioned a few times of late here asking if it is enough to move up 1 or 2 spots if needed.
If trading 8 + 25 to the Dees for 6 or GWS for 7 to get Sanders (assuming he is avail at those picks) can be done then I'd be very happy with that.
It really just depends on the players the Dees/GWS want.
Time will tell but I'm happy to say I really think it is what we are looking at.
Listening to Mackie I was of the impression we're going to trade pick 8.