Lore
Moderator ❀
- Dec 14, 2015
- 48,904
- 73,289
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Moderator
- #35
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
He has lacked consistency for sure . Thing he does really well is hold onto marks but the question marks are there. Is he Curnow or is he Josh battle.Yeah no worries I understand that. I question his ability to make an impact sufficient for a top ten pick.
I wouldn’t say he’s that physically mature. Yes he’s no string bean but He’s not Darcy fogarty or jedd Walter.My concerns on him are his lack of games where he has been dominant given how early he has physically matured. I don’t see him as the same level athlete as Curnow who is a true outlier. And I don’t see the same level ground ball threat as Curnow either.
So yep, the marking looks great, but I’m not convinced it will be a point of difference at the next level.
I’m an armchair expert, I’m basing this off a couple of interviews and videos, but that’s my opinion.
I can see your position on it, but I’m not sold on him.I wouldn’t say he’s that physically mature. Yes he’s no string bean but He’s not Darcy fogarty or jedd Walter.
Curnow was merely an example of players with upside who don’t go in the top and then every one wonders how they didn’t get picked up earlier, there’s players like that in every draft
Yeah. Probably summarises my thoughts.He has lacked consistency for sure . Thing he does really well is hold onto marks but the question marks are there. Is he Curnow or is he Josh battle.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Their back line is aging though. Getting a gun KPD in now to partner SDK will look genius in 3-4 years time.I dunno geelong need a midfield just as bad it’s their glaring weakness right now, their backline is okay.
It'd be fascinating to see what they would pay to trade up....North Melbourne melts if sanders fell into our lap would be quite a sight aswell.
I'd want two of their firsts plus their F2It'd be fascinating to see what they would pay to trade up....
I'd be asking for a straight swap for their F1.I'd want two of their firsts plus their F2
Any thoughts on the reason for the lack of consistency?He has lacked consistency for sure . Thing he does really well is hold onto marks but the question marks are there. Is he Curnow or is he Josh battle.
Emerging key forward, consistently is an issue with 90% of them. If they don’t have that issue they are usually a top 2-3 pick.Any thoughts on the reason for the lack of consistency?
Hard to say. It is the same for a lot of medium / tall forwards. Under 19 footy has not been flush with 40 plus goal kickers . Also playing different roles. He has played some really high forward .In some games he could be working a bit harder and leading to better spots but that can get better as he is a decent athlete .It is hard to get a 100% read because his best is really good but their is a sample of not as good. I would be fine picking him . He has more runs on the board than most of the forward prospects. I suspect if he was 5cm taller there would be more credit . At 193cm the inconsistent stuff is enough to create a little doubt.Any thoughts on the reason for the lack of consistency?
15 (19/20), 17 (22) and their F2 could work out very nicely for us. Hell, we could throw our two seconds in and get that last first rounder as we'll only be able to use one of them anyway.I'd be asking for a straight swap for their F1.
They'd likely say no, and then I'd just take Sanders...
Wow, looks pretty good. Would take him over Caddy.
Wow, looks pretty good. Would take him over Caddy.
Half back most likelyWhere do we see him playing though?
Has predominantly been a winger..
We’re well stocked for wingers, wouldn’t make a tonne of sense for me unless we’re looking to play him in a different position to the one he usually plays..
Wow, looks pretty good. Would take him over Caddy.
I think his attributes look great for half forward. Seems a natural footballer, covers the ground well, has nice lateral and phone box movement and change of direction. Zac Bailey like.Where do we see him playing though?
Has predominantly been a winger..
We’re well stocked for wingers, wouldn’t make a tonne of sense for me unless we’re looking to play him in a different position to the one he usually plays..
Bit tall184cm 76kg - he was made for us!
Id like 2 x hard running wing/flank/outside mid, a midfielder and a ruckman or fwd/ruck. Pete needs a key forward with him but i feel we'll be throwing a huge offer and try and bring one in. Caddy id still take if slides.
Sanders is a must take. Archer Reid if there at our 2nd id take. Windsor and Wilson sound good for us as players who can add run.
FYI this is Caleb Windsor, the guy who on Twomeys show Gettable yesterday said shapes as a top ten bolter. Twomey was pretty definitive saying he will be in and around Essendon and Geelongs picks. Registered one of the top 20m sprint times at the combine: