Lore
Moderator ā
- Dec 14, 2015
- 48,901
- 73,286
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
That, or belt them in the carpark after the gameSo it's best to bide your time and smack them when the ball is nearby?
Well he is pushing with an open palm to his upper arm and it slips high because Newcombe tries to grab him simultaneously. I don't think that should be graded as intentional because you can literally see what his intent was beforeEveryone is saying it's dumb or weak. Let me ask, what's the argument that gets it downgraded to a fine? It was low impact. Can't get lower. It was graded intentional. Hard to argue against that. It's hard to see how we win, which is the issue.
Well he is pushing with an open palm to his upper arm and it slips high because Newcombe tries to grab him simultaneously. I don't think that should be graded as intentional because you can literally see what his intent was before
Newcombe's action directed his hand to hit him high.
I don't see why they don't try with no risk of increasing his suspension.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
So Hewett was deemed to be on the ball/in the contest/however they want to define it?
Seems a dud rule. Essentially because Hewett was near a ball up he was allowed to whack him in the face. Which was more of a punch to the jaw. Redmanās was barely more than a jumper punch, with Newcombe laughed about afterwards cos he sucked him in.
Makes it a bit of a grey area to me
Was it a Carlton player and/or Brownlow fancy?How do they define the 'contest?
Until it comes to finals time and a big name player does the same/similar thing and will get offAnyone moaning about the Redman suspension needs to pay a little more attention.
The AFL effectively closed the loop on off the ball strikjng motions over summer in February.
See:
Mason struck him with both arms, 50m off the ball and ended up getting him high.
Its a pretty straight forward week off, and i dont know what way you could argue it to get him off with a fine without sounding like an idiot (like trying to argue it wasnt a strike).
Edit: See post by Phone above

if there's one word to describe reddog, it's consistent.
he never has a bad game, and he always plays extremely well. he's very important to our team
he's always perfect in my eyes ever since he tried decapitating ginnivin
Unwarranted look that. Red Dog holds it down and everybody knows it.
Unwarranted look that. Red Dog holds it down and everybody knows it.
I think you've nailed it. His off games are rare but when he has them they're pretty ordinary and often ends up with him becoming undisciplined rather than playing with his usual aggressive edge.Look I love Redman and think he is AA quality but there is no denying that when he is off he is ******* atrocious.
Key for him is not having his annual two stinkers.
No, my boy is never atrocious.Look I love Redman and think he is AA quality but there is no denying that when he is off he is ******* atrocious.
Key for him is not having his annual two stinkers.
Some call it being 'undisciplined', but to the trained eye, it's avant garde.I think you've nailed it. His off games are rare but when he has them they're pretty ordinary and often ends up with him becoming undisciplined rather than playing with his usual aggressive edge.
FTFYSome call it being 'avant garde', but to the trained eye, it's undisciplined.