- Aug 30, 2021
- 18,606
- 36,589
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Another chance? So how many has he had now?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Another chance? So how many has he had now?
All part of a master plan to weaken the wooden spoon club & strengthen another Melbourne club... then give Roos more compo.Another chance? So how many has he had now?
And bananas are fruit that grow on herbsWhat for it, Brazil Nuts are a seed and not a nut.
Bananas are a berry, unlike strawberries which are just a regular fruitAnd bananas are fruit that grow on herbs
He's a scumbag, but he has been AFL-punished and should be able to return after seeing it out and doing the reeducation. Otherwise it's double-jeopardy. It's would be ridiculous for the AFL to suddenly say that we got it wrong and will increase the punishment just to appease some later campaign. Of course, should he offend again, then he is fair game.Another chance? So how many has he had now?
He's a scumbag, but he has been AFL-punished and should be able to return after seeing it out and doing the reeducation.
I'm usually talent > all else
but Thomas seems like such a scumbag and his performances haven't ever even approached the heights he projected early
Did he actually do anything wrong in the AFL sense?He's a scumbag, but he has been AFL-punished and should be able to return after seeing it out and doing the reeducation. Otherwise it's double-jeopardy. It's would be ridiculous for the AFL to suddenly say that we got it wrong and will increase the punishment just to appease some later campaign. Of course, should he offend again, then he is fair game.
He’s been AFL punished? Hasn’t North dropped him? If no other club chooses to pick him up it’s their choice, just like they can choose or not choose any player.He's a scumbag, but he has been AFL-punished and should be able to return after seeing it out and doing the reeducation. Otherwise it's double-jeopardy. It's would be ridiculous for the AFL to suddenly say that we got it wrong and will increase the punishment just to appease some later campaign. Of course, should he offend again, then he is fair game.
That's the political problem: they shouldn't get involved with non-football issues.AFL can't have it both ways
They can't come out and make a stand on domestic violence this week then later allow Tarryn Thomas back into the game
Of course they can.AFL can't have it both ways
They can't come out and make a stand on domestic violence this week then later allow Tarryn Thomas back into the game
AFL can't have it both ways
They can't come out and make a stand on domestic violence this week then later allow Tarryn Thomas back into the game
So we are now comparing words to physical assault?So should Tex have been permanently banned as well considering the AFL stance on racism?
Finlayson with their stance on homophobia?
I think you can draw a line at criminal acts a person has been charged with. This wouldn't include Finlayson or Tex. I don't know whether that includes Thomas.So should Tex have been permanently banned as well considering the AFL stance on racism?
Finlayson with their stance on homophobia?
So we are now comparing words to physical assault?
The issue is NOT what Thomas did - its the conflation of 2 opposing events happening
The AFL condemns domestic violence as we all do
Then we see this from Brad Scott. Read the room Brad.
On a day the AFL is trying to promote a cause - someone is trying to promote someone who is the direct cause of the AFL trying to promote it
Bizarro world
Really? What about Richmond's armed robber Pickett?I think you can draw a line at criminal acts a person has been charged with. This wouldn't include Finlayson or Tex. I don't know whether that includes Thomas.
Would include Laidley and Cousins I suspect.
I think you can draw a line at criminal acts a person has been charged with. This wouldn't include Finlayson or Tex. I don't know whether that includes Thomas.
Would include Laidley and Cousins I suspect.
Really? What about Richmond's armed robber Pickett?
My view is that playing AFL is a privilege and the AFL should hold it in such high regard that anyone charged with crimes over a certain benchmark should be banned for life.Really? What about Richmond's armed robber Pickett?
Mate, Hugh McCabbage is bloody hilarious. And they said comedy was dead!What the hell is this s**t?
One of these is not even close to the others!So should Tex have been permanently banned as well considering the AFL stance on racism?
Finlayson with their stance on homophobia?