Think they might make Walters sub based on JLs presser...
It’d be a management thing, but I don’t mind it tactically either. His form hasn’t been amazing and he’s had an impact as the sub before.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Think they might make Walters sub based on JLs presser...
They play on the postage stamp that is the SCG. Their mids just run out of the centre & have a ping.
I reckon if GWS had played them on the MCG their superior outside run would see a different result.
And only one metre shorter than the gabba.......This is a classic example of "if a lie is repeated often enough it becomes the truth"
The SCG is 155m in length, compared to 160m for the MCG. That equates to a whopping 2.5m difference from the centre square to the goals - or of you prefer - approximately one Aaron Sandilands standing on his toes.
Now this game could easily go either way, but one thing is for certain - the length of the ground won't have much to do with the final result.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
And only one metre shorter than the gabba.......
By actual surface area it is certainly not the lowest.
This is a classic example of "if a lie is repeated often enough it becomes the truth"
The SCG is 155m in length, compared to 160m for the MCG. That equates to a whopping 2.5m difference from the centre square to the goals - or of you prefer - approximately one Aaron Sandilands standing on his toes.
Now this game could easily go either way, but one thing is for certain - the length of the ground won't have much to do with the final result.
Indeed - both Geelong and Adelaide have much smaller total areas that either the SCG or Manuka - which are often named as "small grounds".And only one metre shorter than the gabba.......
By actual surface area it is certainly not the lowest.
He’s not nearly as slow as made out to be. Between the ears perhaps.That's the opposite of fast lol
This is a classic example of "if a lie is repeated often enough it becomes the truth"
The SCG is 155m in length, compared to 160m for the MCG. That equates to a whopping 2.5m difference from the centre square to the goals - or of you prefer - approximately one Aaron Sandilands standing on his toes.
Now this game could easily go either way, but one thing is for certain - the length of the ground won't have much to do with the final result.
He is as slow as a ruckman, jack hannath type paceHe’s not nearly as slow as made out to be. Between the ears perhaps.
Camera set up is dogshit there due to standsI'd want to see the reading tape measure. Games at the SCG are awful to watch. Aesthetically they look so different to every other ground.
Basically it's this. People can't get their head around it's longer than it used to be.Note too that this data for the SCG is after the redevelopment in the early 2010s. Before then the SCG set up for AFL really was much smaller - the 50m arcs touched the sides of the centre square. It got so bad that the AFL had the "arc" of the 50m altered for several years just to create a slight gap between the square and the 50.
No it is 100% a calf issueI suspect there is not a calf issue and that the Darcy sub was pre-planned. Maybe they didn't want to sound like they were disrespecting Richmond by going ahead with the plan. I'll be super surprised if Darcy is not named and plays.
Also on Sydney, most of their damn team are elite kicks and slice up zones.. pressure is going to be key, they killed us this way last time they were at Optus.
Surely rain would suit us, with our bigger mids.
So long as we realise it is raining whilst the game is still in the balance.
This is a classic example of "if a lie is repeated often enough it becomes the truth"
The SCG is 155m in length, compared to 160m for the MCG. That equates to a whopping 2.5m difference from the centre square to the goals - or of you prefer - approximately one Aaron Sandilands standing on his toes.
Now this game could easily go either way, but one thing is for certain - the length of the ground won't have much to do with the final result.
hmm bugger, ok.No it is 100% a calf issue
well Scott Watters played for west coast, then swans in 1993-4 then dockers in 1995-6.The Troy Cook cup [emoji471]
Soon to be renamed the Logan MacDonald/Chad Warner cup
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Our next four games are rough
Definitely will be interesting to watch live in person when Sydney play Fremantle at SCG, in June.I'd want to see the reading tape measure. Games at the SCG are awful to watch. Aesthetically they look so different to every other ground.