Rumour 2024 Rumours and Speculation Part 3

[nerRADIAN]

Known commodity? Its a draft pick of a 17 year old kid.

Notable pick 4's - Lachie Ash, Jimmy Toumpas, Jarryd Pickett and Cale Morton.

There’s a reason you have to go back so far to find good examples, talent identification is so much better now

 

[GreyCrow]

 

[1970crow]

We cant be bending over backwards if we aren't just giving up F2 which seems fair

F2 in a heartbeat. I'd pay trinkets on top for a player of his type and age profile. Strange to bend over so quickly for 29yo ANB and then risk PSD to try and extract Peatling for unders.

 

[baldandbroke]

F2 in a heartbeat. I'd pay trinkets on top for a player of his type and age profile. Strange to bend over so quickly for 29yo ANB and then risk PSD to try and extract Peatling for unders.

I don't think we are going the PSD route.

Unders is so irrelevant - what would it be a F3??? Surely, that's not the hold-up ... it will be us trying to make it all fit into what was planned.

I am certain that F2 will end up being the deal.

 

[Mostyn]

I would bet heavily on Norf taking him, having previously pulled a similar stunt with Hugh Greenwood.

Hugh wanted to go there.

Peatling's manager will be controlling where he goes.

 

[Betts are off]

if we walked a 2nd player to the psd from gws i would hope we dont want anyone from there anytime in the future.

It takes 2 to tango.

 

[Mostyn]

Gold Coast absolutely got fleeced in that Rioli trade. Such a shit club.

The clubs that don't get a chance to exploit Gold Coast should be given compensation. It's unfair that only Geelong and Richmond get to benefit.

 

[Mostyn]

they dont need pick 6. they just need to cover academy players. they whole system has really changed the value and perceived sensibility of everything. picks just dont have the same meaning anymore.

To them. Not to everyone else.

 

[Betts are off]

I think people are getting this a bit twisted thinking Big bad Adelaide are walking a 2nd player of GWSs to the PSD.

When really GWS are willing to watch all compensation vanish a 2nd time based on a value they have in their mind. A value that is not all that high to begin with. I mean neither Hately nor Peatling are sheep station trades.

That's just a pattern of pigheaded stubbornness. If they get burned a 2nd time then it's on them IMO

 

[hugecannon]

They should have traded 6 ahead of the Lombard bid then used a future 1st or whatever on Rioli

Surely 6 & 13 could have got them pick 3 from west coast, use 13 for Baker (still too high!!!) and use a future first for Rioli (also too high!!!).

Gives them 3, Lombard and the other players they want

 

[1970crow]

The clubs that don't get a chance to exploit Gold Coast should be given compensation. It's unfair that only Geelong and Richmond get to benefit.

We've traded with them a handful of times, you even closed an account over one of the outcomes.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

He would not get to us via the PSD.

Who is his manager, as should be doing a Connors to make sure this deal is done.

Should be so simple with a F2

 

[Danger_zone]

He would get to us via the PSD.

Who is his manager, as should be doing a Connors to make sure this deal is done.

Should be so simple with a F2

Seems like we’re not budging on F2

 

[crow2crow]

must want to do something with F1 its the only explanation

 

[ams4crows]

Trade radio just suggested we would use pick 4 on Peatling.... Like get bloody real.

We have two future 3rds what is the big deal if we have to give up a Future 2nd

 

[Samcro24]

The two sweetest words in the English language

Pee. Ess. Dee!

 

[Thrillthorpe7]

Trade radio just suggested we would use pick 4 on Peatling.... Like get bloody real.

We have two future 3rds what is the big deal if we have to give up a Future 2nd

Pre season draft pick 4, not main draft

 

[1970crow]

Trade radio just suggested we would use pick 4 on Peatling.... Like get bloody real.

We have two future 3rds what is the big deal if we have to give up a Future 2nd

PSD pick 4 is maybe what they were referring to?

 

[Vader]

Trade radio just suggested we would use pick 4 on Peatling.... Like get bloody real.

We have two future 3rds what is the big deal if we have to give up a Future 2nd

You might have misheard. I'm pretty sure they would have been talking about pick 4 in the PSD, not the ND.

On SM-A5360 using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Crow-eater]

The whole "We want to use our F1 for something" argument falls down when we're offering 2 F3s. If we have no F3, we can't trade F1 anyway.

We may not want to use F2 straight because we may not believe he's worth it.

 

[jenny61_99]

Yep. That macca guy (no idea if he has history on this board) in particular seems to have a very strange agenda against Jenny.

I agree. I have no idea who he was in a past life, but his present persona is nasty.

 

[Betts are off]

Stringer deal is off. GWS pulled their offer.

Looks like they are being super easy to deal with this offseason

 

[Crow till I die]

 

[DJ75]

No.

Our biggest need is an elite top of the draft mid.

I tend to agree. It does make you wonder though, if Richmond asked, what would you accept?
Pick 4 for 10, 11 & 18?

Pick 4 for 6 and 18? 6 & 11?

 

[fuic08]

Kane couldn't even admit fault and apologise for the best and fairest dig either.

Had to start with "if" i got this wrong, then I'm sorry.