Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy US Election Day Thread - Trump 47th President of the United States

Who Wins?

  • Trump 270-280

    Votes: 35 18.9%
  • Harris 270-280

    Votes: 34 18.4%
  • Trump 290-300

    Votes: 22 11.9%
  • Harris 290-300

    Votes: 32 17.3%
  • Trump 300+

    Votes: 35 18.9%
  • Harris 300+

    Votes: 18 9.7%
  • Harris 280-290

    Votes: 3 1.6%
  • Trump 280-290

    Votes: 6 3.2%

  • Total voters
    185
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The race is run, the winner declared!

For further discussion of the election:

For discussion of the incoming president:

For discussion of the losing candidate:

Enjoy, all!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's got a reach of tens of millions of people. You don't think she could have shaken a few loose?
Much like Trump not approaching to be interviewed by more left leaning media …both sides were not going to change their views

Harris already tried by appearing on Fox News which didn’t move the needle much…would had been the same with Rogan who would had pendled his conspiracies bullshit and been another RWNJ being aggressive to her just like the Fox muppet peddling his misinformation and agressivly talking over the top of her
 
That was one of her biggest blunders. She should’ve picked Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro. She’d have at least held that state. Only problem with him is he’s too intelligent and would have made her look more stupid than she already does.
Couldn't pick a "Shapiro" with a large portion of the Democrats base being anti-semites. The left, slaves to the identity politics they created.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Not sitting down and talking to Joe Rogan probably didn't cost her the election, but as it turned out she was in no position to turn down an otherwise hard to reach audience of millions of people.

Though I think the points Howard Stern has made about Hillary Clinton not appearing on his show in 2016 are pretty informative.



Maybe long form unstructured conversation in that type of setting was too much of a risk for her.


Howard Stern or Joe Rogan probably wouldn't admit it but Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris aren't as interesting to them as Trump.

Their listeners wouldn't be as interested in them as Trump either so they wouldn't have been chasing them hard for an interview.
 
Couldn't pick a "Shapiro" with a large portion of the Democrats base being anti-semites. The left, slaves to the identity politics they created.
Oh. And here’s me thinking Trump was the racist…
 
Stay away from twitter / X folks. The super MAGAS are out in force with absolutely shocking posts. Mocking and gloating every Democrat associated person. From telling them to go kill themselves, saying they should be executed, swearing in an extremely aggressive manner, calling black people the N word. One even commented on a young male Democrat (19ish?), telling him that he hope he gets r*ped you sissy f*gg*t. Is this what Musk meant by free speech? Stay classless folks. This is why I have always detested cooker level far right types. They are just as bad in Aus hogging up every news page on social media.

Cue the idiot laugh reacting my post. I mean if you find that kind of stuff funny, then...
Calling someone a Sissy ****** is free speech mate, that's what the anti woke and MAGA morons want. That's the sort of thing I was talking about in an earlier post. End wokism means I want to go back to calling people sissy ******s and not have to answer to it. Truly deplorable stuff to most people with morals and a conscience clearly not to America. If we start going the same way here were in big trouble. There's enough racial and social tensions here as it is it could if it could ignite all sorts of stuff.
 
just like the Fox muppet peddling his misinformation and agressivly talking over the top of her
Then the Fox mob saying she was aggressive and left early.

They've got nothing going on between the ears.
 
Every TV appearance she did she got an avalanche of mouth breathers stating that she didn't change their mind. If she put Rogan in his place... no change. If she bombed? No change.

I don't believe that she could have swayed that audience. Not one bit.

If the rapes and the fraud and the abuse and the child sex trafficking didn't change their mind on Trump, Kamala dunking on Rogan wasn't going to.
You get the point of campaigning is to turn voters voting against you to vote for you.

Never approaching the opposing view isn’t the smartest way to win a election you are behind in which she was at the time
 
That's why she isn't the president.

She got to the vice Presidency because of her colour and what she had between her legs and no other reason.
Now this I can get annoyed at. **** off you pig.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Oh. And here’s me thinking Trump was the racist…
You're correct. It's pretty shocking but that 100% factored into the Democrats decision on VP. Ironic they ended up with a Walz, invokes a particularly brilliant Tarantino villain.

A handy trip is to look at exactly what the Democrats say and consider the reverse:

"Trump is racist" - Kamala didn't choose a clear VP candidate because he was Jewish.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You "Trump is racist" - Kamala didn't choose a clear VP candidate because he was Jewish.
Yeah. That was it. And yet the Musk PAC ads said she was beholden to "teh joos " because her husband is Jewish.
 
I still fail to see why putting Trump in the White House is a good idea for a pro-Palestinian American.
It's not, the idiots couldn't see through the red mist in their eyes and vote for the lesser of the two evils. There's no Trump rhetoric anywhere that says he supports Palestine. This is all on them and I have no sympathy.
 
So we've been hearing about record turnouts at polling booths for 2 weeks

But there's less votes than 2020, for both sides.

10 -15 million less.
I know where about 1.3 million of them went.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top