Hard to use that game as a proper example given that a lot of fans were emotionally checked out and watching from home.The Freo game at the 'G was 30k and the place was pumping. Was brought up how the 'G is so much better at the time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Hard to use that game as a proper example given that a lot of fans were emotionally checked out and watching from home.The Freo game at the 'G was 30k and the place was pumping. Was brought up how the 'G is so much better at the time.
Yes, now it is. They have opened up an outdoor area on level three that lets all the cold air into the stadium. Level three concourse may as well be the G in winter. They must have had March weather or Big Bash cricket in mind when they did this part of the renovation.Anyone else find the place (Docklands) drafty?
Not if you like going to VFL games.I know we want to hold onto the history of the club but is it time to sever ties to Windy Hill? Move into the 21st century and play 100% of our VFL games a Tullamarine?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I know we want to hold onto the history of the club but is it time to sever ties to Windy Hill? Move into the 21st century and play 100% of our VFL games a Tullamarine?
Would be rather hard to expand it given the ground is stuck between a street on each side. Very tight at each end.I get sad driving past windy hill. Can’t help but wonder if we stayed there how amazing a facility it would now be
Being the boards reigning poster of the year I have to say, considering the Grand Final is held there, there I can't agree with that approach. They deserve as many games there as they can get.The MCG should be split evenly for all Melbourne teams and interstate teams should only play there when possible.
I understand it is a money and fans thing but if we want the grand final here every ear we need to start making it more accessible to every team.
Being the boards reigning poster of the year I have to say, considering the Grand Final is held there, there I can't agree with that approach. They deserve as many games there as they can get.
Can’t argue with that.Being the boards reigning poster of the year I have to say, considering the Grand Final is held there, there I can't agree with that approach. They deserve as many games there as they can get.

Is Carton’s home ground the MCG? I’m pretty sure it’s not Docklands like it is for us.Prior to watching Dan26’s video I didn’t realise Carlton next season now have six MCG home games, with just five at Docklands. How is it that the home game allocation across the two stadiums can change just like that for Carlton, yet Essendon seem to be stuck with the 7/4 split?
No. But it's still much ado about nothing. His point is irrelevant, we play 8 games at the MCG annually so it isn't as if we never play thereIs Carton’s home ground the MCG? I’m pretty sure it’s not Docklands like it is for us.
8 games. That’s not too bad. It could be worse.No. But it's still much ado about nothing. His point is irrelevant, we play 8 games at the MCG annually so it isn't as if we never play there
It's about 1/3 of the season. Breaking it down:8 games. That’s not too bad. It could be worse.
Yes it does, but it's vastly different comparing the SCG to the MCG compared to Marvel and the MCG.Interested to see whether people think Sydney's home ground affects their performance on the MCG.
Agree.It's about 1/3 of the season. Breaking it down:
35% at the MCG
39% at Docklands
26% elsewhere
It's hardly worth bitching about.
I did a youtube video of this topic. If anyone wants to subscribe to my channel I'm going to be posting lots of Essendon and general AFL content over the coming months.
surely the thread title should be edited in some way to note that the Boards reigning poster of the year voted No in the poll, meaning that No is the winner of this poll. this should be made clear to all usersBeing the boards reigning poster of the year I have to say, considering the Grand Final is held there, there I can't agree with that approach. They deserve as many games there as they can get.