NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

[Kurve]

Here is US Politics Pt 2

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary will be deleted and warnings issued, that includes mockery and trying to pass it off as a joke.

Play nice, please.

 

[CM86]

Sure Chief. This is my progress so far.

My first post in this thread was on Nov 8 when I decided to show some compassion towards the lefty residents by softening the blow of the 2024 US election result with a video from someone you adore (Keating) waxing lyrical about "the sweetest victory of all". Not really relevant to what you asked me for but just thought I'd throw it in to show you I entered the fray in the right spirit. Sadly my gesture doesn't seem to have been reciprocated or appreciated (0 likes) but I could swear there was a couple on there originally. Is there any possible systems glitch or other explanation for likes being mysteriously removed from old posts?

• #1,390

It was only a few days after that when I ridiculed Trump's description of what DOGE would accomplish - "The Manhattan Project Of Our Time". Although now in hindsight maybe my criticism was unwarranted.

• #1,561
• #1,573

Not much occurred after that except a vigorous defense of Gaetz against all comers. On the evidence I've seen so far I was far more willing to defend Gaetz's honour than Trump's. For instance shortly after the Gaetz gnat straining exercise started to subside I halfheartedly defended Trump while also potting him by pointing out some of his less redeeming characteristics in that defense.

• #2,006

Then during a riveting discussion with you about bone spurs I said I always thought it was suspect he couldn't remember which foot was affected, in effect conceding the possibility he might have been less than truthful.

• #3,289

That's the first month covered.

I'll cover the next month tomorrow unless you think this is enough and my work hasn't been in vain. Pretty sure I threw a few more pointed barbs his way in that period.

Who do you feel you've been more critical of. From most to least:
A. Trump.
B. Mariann Budde
C. Obama just on the 57 states gaffe.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Who do you feel you've been more critical of. From most to least:
A. Trump.
B. Mariann Budde
C. Obama just on the 57 states gaffe.

A,C,B.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

 

[RCAB]

It was only a few days after that when I ridiculed Trump's description of what DOGE would accomplish - "The Manhattan Project Of Our Time". Although now in hindsight maybe my criticism was unwarranted.

• #1,561
• #1,573

Phuc you're dishonest

The very next day you posted this:

So let’s be real... not buying that DOGE was the “Manhattan Project” wasn’t some grand critique of Musk or Trump. That’s just you hedging bets while still carrying their water.

How do you lack such basic critical thinking skills that you can’t even assess your own words in this forum?

You are in a cult. You cannot criticize your leaders. It’s that simple.

And by the way? DOGE is the Manhattan Project, except instead of scientific progress, it’s dropping nukes on democracy.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Phuc you're dishonest

The very next day you posted this:

First post in this thread. Whose benny are you? Faible?

How the hell does me posting a tweet revealing that all of DOGE's actions would be posted online for transparency, run counter to my claim the day before that Trump's description of DOGE as the 'Manhattan Project Of Our Time' was patently ridiculous? You really think transparency would change my opinion on that score especially when you consider the Manhattan Project was the opposite of transparent?

It's you that's being dishonest. Not only that but you're a moron. I expect you aren’t smart enough to know, so I feel duty-bound to inform you before you return to whichever safe space you crawled out from.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Brings a tear to my eye when I think of the painful teenage years he had after his Dad was gunned down when he was only 14.

 

[Dogs_R_Us]

I’m getting a lot of posters asking me what I mean by ‘greater than the sum of their parts’ when I talk about the great man and that Tesla bloke.

This video explains it so I don’t have to respond to all the private messages.

Enjoy.

Trigger warning: lefties please don’t watch you’ll end up back on here trying to break bonbons posts in a row record. Maybe give the basement a bit of a clean.

What sort of a bastard would help blind people, quadriplegics, stranded astronauts, people cut off by floods…

 

[Dogs_R_Us]

View attachment 2230332

Brings a tear to my eye when I think of the painful teenage years he had after his Dad was gunned down when he was only 14.

Another bastard! And this one wants to end children’s chronic disease!

Are there no depths to which this administration won’t sink??

 

[skipper kelly]

First post in this thread. Whose benny are you? Faible?

How the hell does me posting a tweet revealing that all of DOGE's actions would be posted online for transparency, run counter to my claim the day before that Trump's description of DOGE as the 'Manhattan Project Of Our Time' was patently ridiculous? You really think transparency would change my opinion on that score especially when you consider the Manhattan Project was the opposite of transparent?

It's you that's being dishonest. Not only that but you're a moron. I expect you aren’t smart enough to know, so I feel duty-bound to inform you before you return to whichever safe space you crawled out from.

You've got them going.

 

[skipper kelly]

Then during a riveting discussion with you about bone spurs I said I always thought it was suspect he couldn't remember which foot was affected, in effect conceding the possibility he might have been less than truthful.

That must've been a ripper.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

That must've been a ripper.

Yeah. It gets a bit tiresome after a while batting off one logical fallacy after another. I think they operate under the assumption if they keep going on these gnat straining exercises we'll give up. Ironically this is the only reason I don't, but it gets tiresome after a while dealing with one logical fallacy after another. Which is why I try and inject some levity now and again just to maintain my sanity.

 

[skipper kelly]

Yeah. It gets a bit tiresome after a while batting off one logical fallacy after another. I think they operate under the assumption if they keep going on these gnat straining exercises we'll give up. Ironically this is the only reason I don't, but it gets tiresome after a while dealing with one logical fallacy after another. Which is why I try and inject some levity now and again just to maintain my sanity.

Now I know about the brainwashing programs that are going on (thanks DOGE) it's hard not to laugh at the different websites they link to with their new daily hyperbole.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Now I know about the brainwashing programs that are going on (thanks DOGE) it's hard not to laugh at the different websites they link to with their new daily hyperbole.

Yes and laugh we must, rather than get frustrated with the anger they direct our way. Because in reality that's what they're really angry about. The exposure of their corrupt sources, not us.

 

[Stokey]

So DOGE should be able to provide evidence of these payments, like bank deposit statements for these deceased peoples?

So you're for DOGE now?

 

[EasternTiger]

DOGE looking at saving the US taxpayer trillions.

Not a fan of Elon wanting to give the money back to the people. Unless they are just wanting to cut a check to actual citizens who voted for Trump, as a reward for saving their country.

Why would you reward cowards who voted for Kemala? Give them nothing.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

So you're for DOGE now?

Yeah man, it will accelerate the class war. The clock is ticking for your billionaire culture war heroes.

 

[Stokey]

Yeah man, it will accelerate the class war. The clock is ticking for your billionaire culture war heroes.

Billionaires keep the DNC afloat.

It's hilarious which billionare you support and don't support

You are overgrown children.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

Billionaires keep the DNC afloat.

It's hilarious which billionare you support and don't support

You are overgrown children.

Lmao. I’ve never voted for DNC.

But I agree that they are the lesser of two evils.

It’s quite disturbing that you support Epstein’s best friend.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

 

[EasternTiger]

Judge won't block Musk and DOGE from accessing data, making cuts at 7 federal agencies

A judge on Tuesday declined to stop Elon Musk and DOGE from accessing data systems at seven federal agencies.

www.cbsnews.com

Winner winner chicken dinner

 

[Stronzo]

Judge won't block Musk and DOGE from accessing data, making cuts at 7 federal agencies

A judge on Tuesday declined to stop Elon Musk and DOGE from accessing data systems at seven federal agencies.

www.cbsnews.com

Winner winner chicken dinner

Yeah, they win an ever greater centralisation of power.

That always turns out well.

 

[EasternTiger]

Yeah, they win an ever greater centralisation of power.

That always turns out well.

Slash cut burn.

Dems were spending money like drunken sailors.

The fraudulent waste of taxpayer money is over.

You’re done!

 

[bourbons]

Is that you FK?

Yep, FireKrakouer at least gave Easty the prompts to shovel into ChatGPT on this one, a few faint traces of the old magic.

Bless you FK, I asked you to show your lesser how its done and you duly carved time out of your busy mensa schedule to provide at least a few crumbs to the less fortunate

 

[Ghost Patrol]

Slash cut burn.

Dems were spending money like drunken sailors.

The fraudulent waste of taxpayer money is over.

You’re done!

Can you explain why Trump wants to raise the debt limit by another 4 trillion?

U.S. House GOP releases budget that raises debt limit by $4 trillion, extends tax cuts • Colorado Newsline

The plan would cut taxes and boost spending on border security and defense, while cutting other government programs and adding trillions in debt.

coloradonewsline.com

 

[bourbons]

Sure Chief. This is my progress so far.

My first post in this thread was on Nov 8 when I decided to show some compassion towards the lefty residents by softening the blow of the 2024 US election result with a video from someone you adore (Keating) waxing lyrical about "the sweetest victory of all". Not really relevant to what you asked me for but just thought I'd throw it in to show you I entered the fray in the right spirit. Sadly my gesture doesn't seem to have been reciprocated or appreciated (0 likes) but I could swear there was a couple on there originally. Is there any possible systems glitch or other explanation for likes being mysteriously removed from old posts?

• #1,390

It was only a few days after that when I ridiculed Trump's description of what DOGE would accomplish - "The Manhattan Project Of Our Time". Although now in hindsight maybe my criticism was unwarranted.

• #1,561
• #1,573

Not much occurred after that except a vigorous defense of Gaetz against all comers. On the evidence I've seen so far I was far more willing to defend Gaetz's honour than Trump's. For instance shortly after the Gaetz gnat straining exercise started to subside I halfheartedly defended Trump while also potting him by pointing out some of his less redeeming characteristics in that defense.

• #2,006

Then during a riveting discussion with you about bone spurs I said I always thought it was suspect he couldn't remember which foot was affected, in effect conceding the possibility he might have been less than truthful.

• #3,289

Boy oh boy wowee

Unsure why you posted a random video of Paul Keating, but on to your, aha, "criticisms"... the grand total of which appear to be identifying as hyperbole Trump's framing of DOGE as the Manhattan Project of our time, and thinking he might be lying about his bone spurs

No, really mate. You've gone above beyond here with these pointed criticisms, honestly wouldn't have thought a Trump supporter would be capable of such incisive, penetrating introspection. Like a rampaging Upton Sinclair

Bonus points for including a post where you actually defend Trump against accusations of impropriety in the running of his beauty contests, while somehow attempting to frame as the main takeaway your brief mention of some of his less redeeming characteristics, which you of course offered in service of that attempted defence

Maybe just going with yeah I haven't really criticised him was the move? Probably a tad less embarrassing.

That's the first month covered.

I'll cover the next month tomorrow unless you think this is enough and my work hasn't been in vain. Pretty sure I threw a few more pointed barbs his way in that period.

If this is the best you could come up with from the first month, yeah you probably should. You could turn it into a regular feature of this thread? Maybe each month we could have a Nail's Nothingburgers segment? The Milquetoast Musing Hour?

We'll keep workshopping the title