Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Commentary & Media VIII

  • Thread starter Thread starter BoomerRoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fair enough tho. With the sort of footy insight you've shown this week (Ed Richards = Kerridge winner

Forgive me for thinking an 8th year player who has never played every game in a season and who averages 16 disposals a game might be eligible for the Kerridge. What a faux pas...

Will Phillips game is equivalent to LDU getting twice the ball in a third more game time

Today I learned that the difference between 86% TOG and 49% TOG is "a third".

Toby Pink is a better defender than Wil Dawson will be

I never said that, or anything close to that.

If you can quote me saying that I'll delete my account. Balls in your court to prove you don't just make shit up to suit your argument ferby :cool:


You can have the award if it means that much to you.

LOL I don't give a crap about the award. Just don't like seeing North posters personally abused by toxic people.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Fwiw, Ed Richards has been nominated (and accepted) in the Kerridge for the last few years. And someone nominated him this year, too.
 
Forgive me for thinking an 8th year player who has never played every game in a season and who averages 16 disposals a game might be eligible for the Kerridge. What a faux pas...



Today I learned that the difference between 86% TOG and 49% TOG is "a third".

Its out by 4%

LDU had 37% more tog.

That's closer to a third than you are to a having clue about football.

I never said that, or anything close to that.

If you can quote me saying that I'll delete my account. Balls in your court to prove you don't just make shit up to suit your argument ferby :cool:
No you didn't say it. There's a whole bunch of other posters who didn't say or do the things you accused them of either but that didn't stop you. If you don't like it don't do it to other people.

LOL I don't give a crap about the award. Just don't like seeing North posters personally abused by toxic people.

Don't look in the mirror when you're posting then.
 
Fwiw, Ed Richards has been nominated (and accepted) in the Kerridge for the last few years. And someone nominated him this year, too.
After last season he shouldn't have been nominated. I didn't read all the noms this week but would have objected to Richards immediately.
 
Fwiw, Ed Richards has been nominated (and accepted) in the Kerridge for the last few years. And someone nominated him this year, too.

wedding brooklyn GIF
 
Chadwiko I haven't read all of this spat but, even though I like a lot of your posting, try to be the bigger person here and back the truck up. ferball doesn't need me to go in bat for him, but I've found that he's one of the better people on here in terms of being able to have a reasonable discussion without getting into ad hominems - slight contrast with the person he was responding to, whose time is divided between sooking and baiting other posters. I have made myself a rule here (which I mostly keep) that I won't have a go at other posters, but fmd it's hard sometimes.

Caracas, re: your Q in the autopsy thread, I assume some of the negative posters regurgitate the same material because they think that balanced or optimistic posters don't understand and need to be educated. Not to speak for others, but I get it. I just choose not to sook and get the distinction between being optimistic and "accepting mediocrity". And if I want to be educated, I'll read Rick's analysis. Reading the match day thread, I was annoyed by the number of people calling the players soft and sooking that the season is a write off before quarter time in R1. (I could be conflating people. I'm not going to reread it - once is bad enough.) Those people must have a fine sense of irony. Season's not over. We're still a mathematical chance of the Premiership / WilPhil Brownlow double.
 
Not making any defensive excuses for North here but there are two throws from the Dogs in the first clip.

In the third clip, Naughton is free because Logue has just come off with a hammy.
I was thinking of posting something similar but I'm somewhat reluctant to criticise umpires as a rule. But your point is fair, those old boys in yellow aren't always infallible. Luckily their errors didn't have any impact on the scoreboard.
 
I was thinking of posting something similar but I'm somewhat reluctant to criticise umpires as a rule. But your point is fair, those old boys in yellow aren't always infallible. Luckily their errors didn't have any impact on the scoreboard.
Blatant throws. Disgusting. Always the ****ing Dogs.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If I’m still posting in this god forsaken place after a three peat, I’m going to be the most smug, insufferable campaigner imaginable to every other opposition poster that frequents this place.
 
Its out by 4%

LDU had 37% more tog.

That's closer to a third than you are to a having clue about football.


No you didn't say it. There's a whole bunch of other posters who didn't say or do the things you accused them of either but that didn't stop you. If you don't like it don't do it to other people.



Don't look in the mirror when you're posting then.
Children please ……
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom