That was my understanding aswell; but its Joanne Ratcliffe's sister, Suzie Ratcliffe, who was founder of the Leave a Light on Foundation
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Unsolved The Beaumont Children
- Thread starter Kram
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Oh wow! This is the first I’ve heard that there was another child! Initially I’d suspected as such, but I’ve been digging through the very limited information available unable to find anything. Thank you
GreyCrow
Make me an Admin!
- Mar 21, 2016
- 92,379
- 156,454
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, White Sox, Tasmania
The concern is for Marshalls father to be the alleged BF in the Beaumont case his mother would have been less than 16 years old at the time
She was born Oct 1951
ie he could have been but how does he know Stan?
You’re absolutely right. Which as I’ve now had pointed out to me, they were living in Yatina during Marks mother’s school years. Mark was born in 1970 I believe, making her only 19 at the time of birthing him. I’m leaning more so towards the idea that his parents had met through Stan at Yatina
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yeah I seen thatI had the sheer privilege of watching one of his latest Facebook videos - this time, a passionate rant about how he hasn’t been crowned the supreme authority on all things Stansbury. Apparently, people are “cutting his lunch.” Tragic.
The fact that thought would even come to his mind, in my view, speaks volumes. Andrew this is about the children, not you.
Evidence supporting their grand claims so far stands at?
- MK-Ultra? 0
- Satanic cult? 0
- Beaumont? 0
- Whistle-blowers? 0
- the claims about Max? 0
- Louise Bell? 0
Not even a shred of reliable circumstantial evidence, but ayee, who’s counting? Not them. Too busy rewriting history for the 50,000th time
Their claims defy scientific understanding on so many levels that I could the write more novels then the authors of the satin man
Speaking of numbers, I simply must highlight a gem from one of their pages:
"Rachel is a Psychic Medium who has conducted over 12.000 readings during 21 years of professional experience."
Roughly one reading every 1.75 years) Absolutely phenomenal. Standing ovation
Rachel talks about caves lined with skulls ect ect. We only need a fragment? Screw it, we don't even need that, if there was a cave lined with skulls - there's a treasure trove of trace evidence there - don't worry, the forensics team surely won't miss it. She was only a small child, so common sense says it can't of been far. It would also need to be a natural formed caved system given the fact, so that significantly narrows down the search area of where it could be. No digging required, where's the cave Rachel?
They label big footy a bunch of trolls.
Personally not trolling, just picking apart their story. Ah I mean stories!
Their followers are the people most likely to send $200 bucks to a Nigerian Prince.
Like max said "I've done a lot of research on the Beaumont case" Meaning he wasn't there, he wasn't involved.
AM- At least in his last video he got the 1 pound note right, going back a year ago he was saying max handed out 10 pound notes. That Maxy trying to outdo poor ole Harry again. As AM suggested "Max trying to stitch up Harry Phipps"
Hopefully Cossie can debunk this the craziest of theories
I’ve wondered if it’s possible that one of the children might have taken it from their father’s wallet without him noticing. The girls were certainly at the age where a lot of children start to become quite curious about money and how much can be bought with it. Especially if Jane was trying to show off to a new ‘boyfriend’.
Unfortunately I don’t believe he will. He’s gone very quiet on the subject, as Danny doesn’t wish to speak with him at present (which I bet RV and AM will twist in to something that appears to support their false claims)
Flying_as_One1991
Premium Gold
- Oct 22, 2018
- 437
- 801
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Las Vegas Golden Knights, NY Mets
Was going to say taking a long time to organise a dig. Was meant to be done straight after Castalloy.
This is going to drag out and if they find nothing I am sure more stories will come out.
GreyCrow
Make me an Admin!
- Mar 21, 2016
- 92,379
- 156,454
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, White Sox, Tasmania
At least 5 years , 5 books and a special Cossie At Stansbury special
InstinctivelyAlert
Debutant
- Mar 3, 2025
- 117
- 172
- AFL Club
- Essendon
To then be re run every third Sunday of the month at 2pm at 11:45pm.
Danny was commenting in this thread a few years ago, maybe even Simone. Also, someone in the Pike - Munroe - McIntyre circle. They are fairly constant in their Stories.
The older McIntyres, from the first marriage, if you follow their dialog. Its constantly Morphing and Inconsistent. For example, they try and write Harry Phipps into their narrative. Firstly, saying Max attended one of Harrys New Years parties. Then in a recent video, they are saying Max never met Harry.
Cossie's legals would have done their own risk assessment on the dig. I wonder what they told him?
GreyCrow
Make me an Admin!
- Mar 21, 2016
- 92,379
- 156,454
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, White Sox, Tasmania
''its good television but thats about it ''
InstinctivelyAlert
Debutant
- Mar 3, 2025
- 117
- 172
- AFL Club
- Essendon
“Good” here being a very loose term.
InstinctivelyAlert
Debutant
- Mar 3, 2025
- 117
- 172
- AFL Club
- Essendon
So I hear a dig is going ahead at Yatina.
Very interesting.
I’ve also been in contact with someone who claims to have been abducted by Stanley Hart when she was a child.
Very interesting.
I’ve also been in contact with someone who claims to have been abducted by Stanley Hart when she was a child.
************** is the head of the upcoming trip to Yatina. It certainly needs doing, and he’s done some absolutely fantastic work looking in to the AO case. Which leaves me wondering how he managed to believe and then further the McIntyre’s claims so horribly in regards to the Beaumont children
This is very interesting. Are you able to share any details?
I speak to Simone here and there. She is absolutely lovely, and answers all questions without hesitation. I agree, her story never changes.
I’m sure they told him to word it very carefully. He never suggested he did or didn’t believe the remains were in Stansbury. Just that digging there can either find them, or rule the possibility of it out. He was smart in how he went about it, but it would have been smarter for him to try and reach out to Simone and Danny prior to announcing it
Do you know when the photo was taken at all?
It’s a pity that Danny and Simone aren’t more talkative. Their views would be interesting to hear.
If the Beaumont children, and other kids, are inside that sinkhole, would they still be there today, not washed out to sea more than 50 years ago?
I agree. I’ve mentioned to Simone that it was actually through speaking to her that I realised just how obscured RV and AM’s claims were. And she hadn’t even tried to sway the conversation that way. She was simply answering my questions.
I know she was considering speaking on a podcast at one stage, though I’m not sure she has yet.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Detectives told me it could take months.
How do I obtain a copy of his claims?
The latest episode of Insight presents a theory linking the Beaumont abduction to Mr Cruel. I'm sceptical about the value of the Glenelg sketch, but this guy seems to have found a really good match. Convicted pedophiles Barry Francis Watson (died 2019) and another who can't be named for legal reasons are his PoIs.
www.sbs.com.au
SBS On Demand
www.sbs.com.au
Follow the money.
Can anyone tell me exactly what Marshall's crimes were and his sentence?
Was he a major perpetrator in child sex crimes?
And what about his Dad? What was he convicted of? Jail time?
I'm trying to establish why certain people have high profiles and why their names keep rising to the surface as poi in the BC and AO cases.
Surely there were more sex offenders around when these crimes were committed
