Umpiring Round 2 Bulldogs v Collingwood

[smasha]

North were absolutely robbed that day too. Cost them the game.

Pies have form here.

Adeladie at the G last year
North at Marvel last year
and now the dogs at the G

Handy when the rub of the green consistently goes your way

2023 finals series.

 

[smasha]

Great examples shown of the rorting on AFL 360.

 

[Nvent]

2023 finals series.

The Coll v GWS Prelim was atrocious

 

[domus]

My point is it dictated the result. Collingwood wouldnt have won without the lopsided free kick count. Thats a fact.

Did you factor in the two goals we had stolen from us by poor umpiring? Elliott placed in a headlock 15m out from our goal and ump ignores it or didn't see it-poor positioning. Cox belted after he marked-no 50m which would have placed him 20m out directly in front. Oh-and Darcy shoved McStay so hard in the back he was last seen heading over the fence on the northern stand wing and the Darcy grab led to a Bulldogs goal.

 

[domus]

The Coll v GWS Prelim was atrocious

Sensational game. The intensity and quality of footy under pressure was unbelievable.

 

[domus]

No they told the truth that's all.


The fact they actually spoke out shows how bad it was.

Yawn. Commentators speak out about the umpiring every week.

 

[Nvent]

Sensational game. The intensity and quality of footy under pressure was unbelievable.

Umpiring was biased

 

[domus]

Mathew Lloyd and Jimmy Bartel scathing on the umpires on 3AW.

Can’t remember experts ever doing that.

Is that the biggest diver in AFL history Matthew Lloyd, complaining about bad umpiring?

 

[domus]

Umpiring was biased

Get a life. When you've lost three grand finals to bad umpiring decisions come and post about umpires.

 

[sabso]

I’m interested. The umpiring apparently went collingwood’s way. Can somebody please point which of their free kicks were incorrect decisions? I do recall recall a couple of blatant errors where Darcy clearly infringed before marking and then goaled which had an impact, and the cox punch to the face was an obvious 50 which should have had the free taken from the top of the goal square.

 

[lalorGOAT]

Collingwood were clearly the better team.

Dogs should be the last to complain. They literally won a premiership with some very generous calls/non-calls.

 

[Fadge]

Great examples shown of the rorting on AFL 360.

Sp what was your takeaway?

 

[Reg Grundy35]

Great examples shown of the rorting on AFL 360.

you'll do. I need someone to explain how this "rort" or "fix' actually works. By whom, where and how is the rort planned. If the umpires don't have a rep at this conference, how is the rort conveyed to them, by whom and why would they accept the assignment? What is the goal of the rort? If it was to help Collingwood win why were they abandoned last year? its so easy to say bias, cheating, rort but a bit harder to go the next step eh?

 

[Bulldog Joe]

Did you factor in the two goals we had stolen from us by poor umpiring? Elliott placed in a headlock 15m out from our goal and ump ignores it or didn't see it-poor positioning. Cox belted after he marked-no 50m which would have placed him 20m out directly in front. Oh-and Darcy shoved McStay so hard in the back he was last seen heading over the fence on the northern stand wing and the Darcy grab led to a Bulldogs goal.

Clear to see you have an ability to see things only in Black and White.

The rest of the competition moved to colour in the 70s.

 

[MagpieJo]

This is so innacurate and really not a reflection at all on Bigfooty. Get your bonkers blinkers off... Oh wait, they're welded on. Carry on.

@freekickhawthorn

 

[MagpieJo]

Every club says the same though. I get texts after we get one free kick saying it’s a gift.

I can’t honestly remember commentators and media condemning umpiring in unison like this though.

you need new friends then!!

 

[MagpieJo]

Clear to see you have an ability to see things only in Black and White.

The rest of the competition moved to colour in the 70s.

adress his comments, all of those gimme goals were calls we should have gotten.

 

[TruRoo]

Sp what was your takeaway?

Mostly that Razor Ray is still a bit of a ****wit

 

[Bulldog Joe]

adress his comments, all of those gimme goals were calls we should have gotten.

Well they aren't correct.
Cox was in the contest - Just a free kick.
Plenty of arm chops to Darcy not paid.
Clear front on to Naughton at the start of the 4th not paid
Deliberate out of bounds by Daicos Not paid.

His comments that you missed a couple are very pro Collingwood view.

You need to open both eyes sometimes.

 

[Hot Dogma]

Clear to see you have an ability to see things only in Black and White.

The rest of the competition moved to colour in the 70s.

Likewise, it's clear to see you have an ability to see things only in Blue, Red and White.

The rest of the competition moved to colour in the 70's.

 

[Fadge]

Mostly that Razor Ray is still a bit of a ****wit

So you didn't get the positive affirmation you were hoping for?

 

[TW Sherrin]

Noise of affirmation exists big time for MCG tenants.

Interesting that it's only ever mentioned about Optus stadium when Vic sides th8nk they are being disadvantaged.

Coaches and presidents get upset. Calls for investigations and extra training and umpires told to not get sucked in ....but only at Optus.

Some clubs get arm chair rides. As do some players.

There is 1 MCG tenant in the top 10 +/- free kicks in the last 4 completed seasons but carry on with the MCG bias...

There is however 3 interstate teams in the top 5...surprisingly 2 Optus tenants....

2. Brisbane
4. Freo
5. WCE



don't let facts get in the way of your opinion.

 

[bzparkes]

I’m interested. The umpiring apparently went collingwood’s way. Can somebody please point which of their free kicks were incorrect decisions?

Glad you asked.

 

[Fadge]

Glad you asked.

Compelling.

In summary, according to Razor, the only decision that was incorrect was the Bailey Dale deliberate out of bounds, only because he didn't 'hit the ball hard enough toward the boundary line'....

 

[bzparkes]

Compelling.

Sure is, glad you agree.