- Sep 9, 2015
- 908
- 2,796
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Haha I thought of this alsoSurely Robbie Williams will donate him some cash.


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Haha I thought of this alsoSurely Robbie Williams will donate him some cash.


$1.7m is more than 10% of the current salary cap $15.8m. Over 10% of the cap is a ridiculous investment in one player.If TdK takes the an offer like StKilda’s we are only talking $300k more after tax. $600 dollars a week. In the scheme of things, it’s not that great as he’ll be earning good money with us as well. What he gives up is the Carlton family, network and future business opportunities that I don’t believe he’ll get at the Saints. IMO, Short term gain for long term loss.
19th Live Pick…Far out we have to wait till
Pick 19.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
$1.7m is more than 10% of the current salary cap $15.8m. Over 10% of the cap is a ridiculous investment in one player.
He’s very good don’t get me wrong, but I don’t think he’s in the Gary Ablett senior, Wayne Carey, Jonathan Brown, Kernahan, Judd win a game off his boot, week in - week out, category.
I suppose it doesn’t really matter whether he is or isn’t worth 10% of the salary cap: if St Kilda’s dumb enough to offer it to him then he would be dumber not to accept it, right?
Melbourne and Max Gawn beg to differ.I would love TDK to stay as he could be the best ruck in the league, as we are beginning to see. However, not many premierships are won with a ruck who is best in the league. As long as a ruck is serviceable, a team can win the flag.
You didn't look after our salary cap in the late 90's did you? Pretty sure that $300,000 divided into 52 lots is more like $6000 each week.If TdK takes the an offer like StKilda’s we are only talking $300k more after tax. $600 dollars a week. In the scheme of things, it’s not that great as he’ll be earning good money with us as well. What he gives up is the Carlton family, network and future business opportunities that I don’t believe he’ll get at the Saints. IMO, Short term gain for long term loss.
Melbourne and Max Gawn beg to differ.
Yep. Forgot the extra 0. My bad.You didn't look after our salary cap in the late 90's did you? Pretty sure that $300,000 divided into 52 lots is more like $6000 each week.
Need to go back to school Surrey, that would be 6k a week not $600 a week extraIf TdK takes the an offer like StKilda’s we are only talking $300k more after tax. $600 dollars a week. In the scheme of things, it’s not that great as he’ll be earning good money with us as well. What he gives up is the Carlton family, network and future business opportunities that I don’t believe he’ll get at the Saints. IMO, Short term gain for long term loss.

He took a wage as an assistant coach there for about a decadeAsk Aaron Hammil how he feels - currently he's working as an Assistant Coach at Carlton - after having went for the money to Shit Kilda over 20 year ago - doesn't look like he was too looked after in life after football at Shit Kilda.
Net pay would have been 10c in the dollar.He took a wage as an assistant coach there for about a decade
Almost impossible to measure, can we ask chat GPT for a list of net worth’s of players from the big Vic clubs vs Saints or Dogs.Why would a recently retired player like Jack Reiwoldt make such a strong point of it, when asked if TDK will stay/go?
Our opinions aside - he’s a recently retired premiership player from a big club who may know something about it first hand.
Clubs like Carlton, Collingwood, Richmond, Essendon rarely lose players they want to keep , rebuilds & drug saga’s aside!
Plenty of good players are traded, more & more each year.
TDK may well walk - I hope he doesn’t.
But I’d like to know more about what Reiwoldt said about earning capacity of players post career in big clubs.
There may be something to it.
Depends I guess if you asked me when I was young and playing with my best mates my loyalty would be honour and the shame of betrayals.In a world as expensive as this. You take all of it because it's still not huge numbers and it's only for limited years. It's security against injury, it's security for your children if something happens to you. It's future opportunity and freedom. It's providing the best for your family. It opens up opportunity to be far more philanthropic in retirement... I'm taking the extra every day of the week not for me but for my family. Why wouldn't you.
If TdK takes the an offer like StKilda’s we are only talking $300k more after tax. $600 dollars a week. In the scheme of things, it’s not that great as he’ll be earning good money with us as well. What he gives up is the Carlton family, network and future business opportunities that I don’t believe he’ll get at the Saints. IMO, Short term gain for long term loss.
I can tell your a good sort circus. I do like honest types.Hey Surrey ... how about you give me $300000 and I'll pay you $600 a week for 2 whole years. I'm generous like that![]()
You could certainly live the good life, if you weren’t playing AFL footy. Up the snoz & high quality lady friends…If TdK takes the an offer like StKilda’s we are only talking $300k more after tax. $6000 dollars a week. In the scheme of things, it’s not that great as he’ll be earning good money with us as well. What he gives up is the Carlton family, network and future business opportunities that I don’t believe he’ll get at the Saints. IMO, Short term gain for long term loss.
Thats all down the the secret herbs and spices the AFL decide on. I can't see any FA's we'd be overly keen on anyway though so I'm not sure this would come into calculations too much for us. Obviously a player like Richards would be great but he'd cost every bit of a million a year at this stage.For the FA compo itks.
Say TDK gets $1.7M over 7 which equals band 1 (currently 7)
We then sign a FA for say $700,000
Do we still get band 1 as we are $1M ahead?
The AFL compo rules uses the word net loss when determining compo.
Or would it be we get band 1 but bring in a band 2 so we end up with band 2 or 3?
The saints deal is so far bigger than anything else I can see a claim that we could keep band 1 compo and still get a player
l would absolutely not define this offer by the Saints as a smart move.I said a while back I believe TDK will take the money and run and firmly believe he still will.
If the Saint have a war chest like has been mentioned, expect TDK to make approx 2.5 million in his first year. Then after that it will fluctuate but probably be around the 1.1 - 1.5 million a year range which is easy for clubs these days, especially with the increases coming.
It will be a very smart offer by the Saints and who wouldn’t like approx 2.5 million in the 1st year of a new job.
Hate the Club but if we had money to spare, I’d be expecting us to play our cards the same way.
?Saints take TDK while their President ensures we pay through the nose for Harry Dean.
I reckon we go hard for Darcy Cameron.So does anyone know of good rucks in any of the other leagues that would be worth investing in for the next 18 months?