- Moderator
- #673
Over to the Game Day thread …
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Who you bring in?I'll be brutal here - if there isn't a huge response/better performance this week, Voss should go immediately.
(by which I mean a decent win, with the right effort levels..)
Enough excuses.
In: JSoS
Out: Don't care as there are multiple candidates.
Request...please stop running 2/3 Carlton players at the single opposition player to then be handballed over their head allowing opponents to break free in overlap. It's as stupid as it gets with this side.
After watching Weitering i now think it is JSoS that is the heart of the backline. What a gun, and literally the only player with a defensive mental profile i like in our side. You see it in the losses, not the wins.
Noticed the above aswell, we did it constantly vs Crows, but not as much when playing well vs Cats and North.
Seems players need a directive, to read situation & identify that if one teammate’s in there going after the guy with the ball, back teammate to tackle properly, and move toward the likely next target/recipient (anticipate) to shut down the Oppo’s release option
Is a huge factor in the difference between the results Crows v Cats/North.
Soapy V Can't agree that a win against the taints doesn't matter.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
PortFreo?
That requires a high level of repeat endurance, unfortunately his not built for the wing role…Agree with all that. I just can't currently justify his place in the team, other than a wing option.
Crows just played keeping’s off. Just kicked the ball around a lot and didn’t allow it to be played how we’d liked it to be playedI won't be watching Crows game. So have a q.
Did we play and extra at the stoppages? If so the game plan may have been to win the contest. And having 2 players hunt is part of the plan. It may be that the other mids didn't manage the outside players adequately or there was confusion on who stayed out.
Either way, we are a contested based footy team. Most weeks we win that battle and we five ourselves a chance. Sounds like on the weekend crows beat us at our core strength.
Saints game I expect us to continue contested game, and hopefully clean up a few things around the stoppages.
Agree Sos has been terrific down back, and he coming in makes a big difference.
Sub is a conundrum for us. We don't seem.to have the right types available or flex in team to adjust. Doc is the right player but his form means it's not working.
Did we play and extra at the stoppages? If so the game plan may have been to win the contest. And having 2 players hunt is part of the plan. It may be that the other mids didn't manage the outside players adequately or there was confusion on who stayed out.
Nic Newman to coach the team for rest of year.Who you bring in?
MM?
Which we far to easily allowed them too, pressure accountability positioning defensively team ethos was an absolute mess…Crows just played keeping’s off. Just kicked the ball around a lot and didn’t allow it to be played how we’d liked it to be played
We used to buy players but if there was a way to buy goals we'd be champions againCrazy thing is if we won buy 5 goals we’re an outside chance of being 8th at the end of the round.


INS: Silvagni Boyd Cowan Binns
OUT: Docherty Acres Lord Fogarty
Boyd Weitering Haynes
Carroll Silvagni Saad
Hollands Cripps Walsh
Elijah McKay White
McGovern Curnow Durdin
DeKoning Cerra Hewett
Young Motlop Binns Cowan (w/m)
Acres Lord Fogarty
Not much in the reserves that are at the required level of production & consistency yet, development needed with many whilst a few have been a little disappointing altogether…
yep - the only 'caveat' on your analysis is opposition can only play their game as much as Carlton allows it to happen - the effort/execution was below par but Adelaide are also massively under rated - they should have beaten Geelong - like Carlton did.Hopefully it is safe to return here after a very disappointing loss last week.
So far this year Carlton have;
averaged 67 tackles a game, on the weekend they laid 46 and still won the tackle count by 10.
averaged 142 contested possessions a game - last week we had just 112 (losing by 17)
averaged 41 clearances a game, last week we had just 30 (losing by 8)
The league best DE per game is 75.4% (the Crows have been averaging 73.1%) last week the Crows averaged 80% DE
Basically we got beaten at the contest & clearance and then the Crows were exceptional with their ball use which prevented us getting our game going (the crows had 255 uncontested possession while the league best average is 238 while also taking 120 marks while the league best average is 102).
I really think that it was much more a case of the Crows being exceptional than us being terrible and is we can get a big response from our on ball brigade at the clearance/contest this week we should be a massive chance against the Saints.
Great Summary JR... but my issue was more so that we let it happen without really firing a shot. That too me was what was so disappointing.Hopefully it is safe to return here after a very disappointing loss last week.
So far this year Carlton have;
averaged 67 tackles a game, on the weekend they laid 46 and still won the tackle count by 10.
averaged 142 contested possessions a game - last week we had just 112 (losing by 17)
averaged 41 clearances a game, last week we had just 30 (losing by 8)
The league best DE per game is 75.4% (the Crows have been averaging 73.1%) last week the Crows averaged 80% DE
Basically we got beaten at the contest & clearance and then the Crows were exceptional with their ball use which prevented us getting our game going (the crows had 255 uncontested possession while the league best average is 238 while also taking 120 marks while the league best average is 102).
I really think that it was much more a case of the Crows being exceptional than us being terrible and is we can get a big response from our on ball brigade at the clearance/contest this week we should be a massive chance against the Saints.
Yeah we were off but the Crows did a great job of keeping the ball out of a contest - just 82 tackles for the game between both sides is roughly what Carlton usually lay themselves.Great Summary JR... but my issue was more so that we let it happen without really firing a shot. That too me was what was so disappointing.
Silvagni in for Young is a massive change - Young wasn't terrible but is defence only and is slowness when in possession allows the opposition to set up, SOS gets the ball moving fast and provides a real bounce.I'd stick with the team that beat Geelong which means the only change I would make is for Cottrell who is a definite out.
IN: Silvagni (if available) Cowan
OUT: Young, Docherty
Sub: Lord
Binns isn't an AFL player and Boyd is showing very little in VFL possibly an alternative to Carrol if Carrol gets sore but we need to get games into hm and White. Hopefully Cincotta starts playing soon and we can get him ripe for after the bye. There is not much else in VFL to even talk about - based on form.You can see the difference between VFL and AFl eevn in a player like Docherty who had an enormous last quarter against Norths in VFL and when back in to AFL was ineffective ( again) Young is only a defender in break glass situation - much prefer him as a forward/ruck.
Young and Weitering just don't work. Young has shown promise forward of centre. But in the back half, we can't afford to carry an additional flaky player when we also have Gov and Haynes. This is where the backline depth is a problem. Hopefully JSOS is fit to play.Silvagni in for Young is a massive change - Young wasn't terrible but is defence only and is slowness when in possession allows the opposition to set up, SOS gets the ball moving fast and provides a real bounce.
Some player outs cost more than just a role player out .Silvagni in for Young is a massive change - Young wasn't terrible but is defence only and is slowness when in possession allows the opposition to set up, SOS gets the ball moving fast and provides a real bounce.
Young should have played deeper on Thilthorpe and Weitering should have taken Walker. Big error playing Young on Walker who ran him around. Weitering should have taken ownership, - that’s leadership - instead as per normal wanted to play his game and ignore what is best for the team. Just disppointing.Young and Weitering just don't work. Young has shown promise forward of centre. But in the back half, we can't afford to carry an additional flaky player when we also have Gov and Haynes. This is where the backline depth is a problem. Hopefully JSOS is fit to play.
Wow. Some big calls there SB. I can't say i have noticed JW putting himself above the team.Young should have played deeper on Thilthorpe and Weitering should have taken Walker. Big error playing Young on Walker who ran him around. Weitering should have taken ownership, - that’s leadership - instead as per normal wanted to play his game and ignore what is best for the team. Just disppointing.