- Mar 29, 2019
- 6,804
- 17,526
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Except pressure. Which goes back to the problem for Sheldrick, he doesn't really have a particular thing he is great at, that he can stake his spot in the team on. At this rate it is finding the ball, and the way he's using it, that's almost a net negative.The problem is that the big 3 should be top 5 in our BnF so they should be performing at a higher level than role players which is the current level they are all playing at.
Sheldrick is pretty much outperforming Rowbottom is all categories
If you regulate for the fact that Sheldrick has been sub in the sample size, or just remove themExcept pressure. Which goes back to the problem for Sheldrick, he doesn't really have a particular thing he is great at, that he can stake his spot in the team on. At this rate it is finding the ball, and the way he's using it, that's almost a net negative.
Not playing him in the middle so let him develop in the VFL.Cleary rorted…idk, seems piss weak to me. Lloyd ffs
Saying Robert’s is out with illnessRoberts needs a run in the 2s
Mitchell that is unfair
AgreeFlorent still not good enough to get back. Will be traded at the end of the year.
No. It’s not. Development is better at the level…particularly with our vfl side.Not playing him in the middle so let him develop in the VFL.
Yes it sucks but its best for him as playing him a small forward exclusively isn't doing much
Favourite player, but should have had a full game in reservesGoood to see Harry back
If you are talking about Rowbottom in basically the worst form of his career and Sheldrick who was promoted to the senior side because he was supposedly in great form, well then that's not much of an endorsement of Sheldrick.If you regulate for the fact that Sheldrick has been sub in the sample size, or just remove them
PA Rowbottom 24
PA Sheldrick 18.66
Tackles Rowbottom 7
Tackles Sheldrick 6
Small sample size but Sheldrick is starting to put up more numbers than Rowbottom but also have similar (not exactly the same defensive work)
Bice and Lloyd should buy lottery tickets ASAP