LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Have you seen the seniors play?
Define “play”
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Have you seen the seniors play?
Reserves beaten by 94 points last week, was only 28 points at 3qtr time, no one is banging the door down to get a gameHow do we know unless we try. Play Hayward out of the square he’d do better than Francis/Hamling anyway. You won’t know unless you try
I have no idea why they are playing him like that. He's a mid and a good one. Play him in his natural elementNot playing him in the middle so let him develop in the VFL.
Yes it sucks but its best for him as playing him a small forward exclusively isn't doing much
I’m not seeing a lack of confidence or touch. I get what you are saying, I just don’t think his performances need any of those things. He needs to keep developing ang playing at the level to be the best version of himself.I'm against him being out too but he'll jump straight into the midfield and knowing his standards, have a good block to get his confidence up and touch.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Reserves beaten by 94 points last week, was only 28 points at 3qtr time, no one is banging the door down to get a game

1. engage in activity for enjoyment and recreation rather than a serious or practical purpose.Define “play”
I want Wil as a leading FF, like Modra. He is very capable of that. Empty the 25 metre space. Draw the defenders wide and let him lead into space. If he drops the mark, the smalls are there to mop up starting wide from the 25.How do we know unless we try. Play Hayward out of the square he’d do better than Francis/Hamling anyway. You won’t know unless you try
1. engage in activity for enjoyment and recreation rather than a serious or practical purpose.
The last part sums the Swans up
Who do you bring in, will make no difference wether Lloyd is in or not his replacement will be equally uselessSo your plan is keep Lloyd in…
Well I’ll give you this…we are going full on for that top 2 pick and we can get it! I have faith in them to kick it to the opposition like Lloyd all year long
I agree on him staying in, should be playing for the rest of the year. However there's obviously a reason on why he's out. He's played consecutive weeks in a tough role in a poor forward line so I'm assuming Cox wants him to have a few games in his natural position in the 2s.I’m not seeing a lack of confidence or touch. I get what you are saying, I just don’t think his performances need any of those things. He needs to keep developing ang playing at the level to be the best version of himself.
Ladhams was not dropped. He is injuredIncredibly disappointing team changes. No balls from Cox, dropping young players that did nothing wrong as a scapegoat. I'm no Ladhams fan but he was our best key forward. Mitchell showed more intent than most senior players. Cleary should be playing. Hamling out fine, Roberts illness, can't argue that.
Switch McLean, Lloyd and Bice out for Ladhams, Cleary and Mitchell.
Edit: Ladhams for Buller due to injury
Subs have not been named yet. Just because he is last named it doesn't mean he will be sub. They have up until 1 hour before the game to name the Sub.He’s not running the same midfield.
Sheldrick is sub (as always happens to the player named 5th on the bench), Mills into the mids.
But my god it’s weak selection changes. Sheldrick and Cleary scapegoated for a god awful performance by some of the senior players.
Bugger. Back to 245 games and counting to break Jack Crisp’s record.Roberts is ill
Blakey?Lloyd is absolutely on thin ice
As soon as Errol is back I think he's in trouble.
Unfortunately we don't have anyone to replace Lloyd and his Tog and 2 way running.
That's the problem and why Bice and Lloyd for example are still in.Good to have wicks and Harry against there smalls.
Hopefully they are actually both fit
Hanily in is fine, but CC being out isn't due to form. He's been doing his main job pretty well most weeks.Wicks replaces Roberts.
It should have been Bice however Roberts has COVID/RSV .
Hanily comes in for CC. Rewarding form in the Ressies.
Cunningham for Mitchell. No brainer.
Francis for Hamling . No brainer. Francis is better at both ends.
Mills for Pete L . Injury based. Probably pushes Adams to the Sub spot.
Lloyd is absolutely on thin ice
As soon as Errol is back I think he's in trouble.
Unfortunately we don't have anyone to replace Lloyd and his Tog and 2 way running.