Remove this Banner Ad

Kane "Bully" Cornes banned from any media engagement with North Melbourne

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Kane doesn't believe half the bullshit he spits out which is even more embarrassing for his acolytes who preach his "hard-truth"

I think he believes everything he says, but sometimes adds a bit of accentuation on a couple of comments

He believes that sheezel should be play mid-fwd, that north shouldn't have recruited Daniel for pick 26, no Darling who is stunting Malley's development or Chom as a fwd

But anyway, you've proved my point. Typical North fan who can't handle the truth
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I think he believes everything he says, but sometimes adds a bit of accentuation on a couple of comments

He believes that sheezel should be play mid-fwd, that north shouldn't have recruited Daniel for pick 26, no Darling who is stunting Malley's development or Chom as a fwd

But anyway, you've proved my point. Typical North fan who can't handle the truth

he does, hes got the skip bayless formula. hot takes with 80% truth and add in a trolling element
 
I think he believes everything he says, but sometimes adds a bit of accentuation on a couple of comments

He believes that sheezel should be play mid-fwd, that north shouldn't have recruited Daniel for pick 26, no Darling who is stunting Malley's development or Chom as a fwd

But anyway, you've proved my point. Typical North fan who can't handle the truth
Sheezel did play mid-fwd in the back half of least year and was rated by CD as one of the most effective players in the comp at the time, just ask Hoyney, Korne isn't a revolutionary there; no North fans disagree with Daniel at pick 26; Darling stunting anyones development is hilarious considering his role is to block/clear leading lanes, Maley in particular given how raw he is (if you ask him he'll tell you he wasn't ready for AFL...) and Chom is required down back. You're a deadset moron. Thrash it out over a chat at the Orrong?
 
Sheezel did play mid-fwd in the back half of least year and was rated by CD as one of the most effective players in the comp at the time, just ask Hoyney, Korne isn't a revolutionary there; no North fans disagree with Daniel at pick 26; Darling stunting anyones development is hilarious considering his role is to block/clear leading lanes, Maley in particular given how raw he is (if you ask him he'll tell you he wasn't ready for AFL...) and Chom is required down back. You're a deadset moron. Thrash it out over a chat at the Orrong?
I don’t see how I’m a moron?

West Coast wanted Darling out because he was disrupting the progress of Jack Williams
Ideally, North would be playing a young Key fwd. eg. Wade Derksen not play darling

Chom did show promising signs last yr as a fwd.

Anyway, i just don’t understand why North (and saints, Richmond etc) fans get annoyed at Kane when his critique applies accountability to their club.

Port fans are on the opposite side with Kane.
They’re frustrated that Kane doesn’t often critique Ken (in port fans’ eyes)

Fwiw, I think Ken has done a really good job with the list he has.
 
Of all the things I expected Kane to have to apologise for this wasn't one. The whole thing seemed to be a mess between the umpires, the umpires coach and Laura Kane. Not Hodgey, Cornes and Daisy. I doubt there was any financial settlement, just the apology.

One thing the umpires have achieved is put all media on notice. I think they will all pull back on the criticism.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I think he believes everything he says, but sometimes adds a bit of accentuation on a couple of comments

He believes that sheezel should be play mid-fwd, that north shouldn't have recruited Daniel for pick 26, no Darling who is stunting Malley's development or Chom as a fwd

But anyway, you've proved my point. Typical North fan who can't handle the truth

what truth?? what you stated are all what people call opinion.
 
Of all the things I expected Kane to have to apologise for this wasn't one. The whole thing seemed to be a mess between the umpires, the umpires coach and Laura Kane. Not Hodgey, Cornes and Daisy. I doubt there was any financial settlement, just the apology.

One thing the umpires have achieved is put all media on notice. I think they will all pull back on the criticism.
I see zip wrong commentators critiquing a game...players and umpires.
If umpires think they shouldn't be criticized...get out of the game.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Of all the things I expected Kane to have to apologise for this wasn't one. The whole thing seemed to be a mess between the umpires, the umpires coach and Laura Kane. Not Hodgey, Cornes and Daisy. I doubt there was any financial settlement, just the apology.

One thing the umpires have achieved is put all media on notice. I think they will all pull back on the criticism.

Some of what was being said crossed the line.

And that's why they are apologising.
 
I don’t see how I’m a moron?

West Coast wanted Darling out because he was disrupting the progress of Jack Williams
Ideally, North would be playing a young Key fwd. eg. Wade Derksen not play darling

Chom did show promising signs last yr as a fwd.

Anyway, i just don’t understand why North (and saints, Richmond etc) fans get annoyed at Kane when his critique applies accountability to their club.

Port fans are on the opposite side with Kane.
They’re frustrated that Kane doesn’t often critique Ken (in port fans’ eyes)

Fwiw, I think Ken has done a really good job with the list he has.
Yes, Chom did show promising signs in the singular half he played forward against Carlton. But as I said, he is required down back. Which part don't you understand? And how are you so dense that you automatically assume that WC and North KPF depth is identical despite North famously not having key forward depth? Maley is raw, Whitlock is raw, Wil Dawson is raw, but you want to pluck a name at another club who is also raw despite us having invested two first round draft picks at KPF's in the last two drafts. Darling is an ideal player to bring these guys through as a bridge until they are ready, which is exactly what we've seen with Maley getting a taste of it.

I feel bad now because it's becoming apparent you're a few shit hats short of a hat rack
 
I think he believes everything he says, but sometimes adds a bit of accentuation on a couple of comments

He believes that sheezel should be play mid-fwd, that north shouldn't have recruited Daniel for pick 26, no Darling who is stunting Malley's development or Chom as a fwd

But anyway, you've proved my point. Typical North fan who can't handle the truth

That you exist to win Premierships, but in real terms, are further away than a poverty stricken, relocation worthy Norf.

How's downtown south Gawler treating you on this Friday evening? You cut one loose from the herd yet?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Kane "Bully" Cornes banned from any media engagement with North Melbourne

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top