Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 List Management discussion

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Mail today is positive, but if NWM decides to leave, all the options are bad for us. Sure he'd ask to be traded again but the circumstances would be different in 12 months time (we'd know where PA's 2026 first has landed for starters). Would he be a FA at the end of 2026 because he had left our list only to be added to it again?

There are aspects of the system that need testing IMO. So I could understand why we would do that rather than take 45c in the dollar.

However, mail today is positive. Desperately want NWM to stay and become a Saints legend and premiership player.
Mail?
 
I've heard that the AFL have told Port that if it wanted to get NWM, Port's trade offer would need to reflect NWM's actual value and that the AFL would veto the trade if it was completely unfair.

So its multiple first rounders (from where???) or players of equal value (Butters?) and apparently Bergmann can't be part of the equation because he's coming anyway in a sperate deal.
Why would the AFL need to intervene in a deal this early ….that concerns if true…
 
Why are so many clubs keen on him if he’s just a poor back pocket? Dangerfield can’t kick, Fyfe couldn’t really kick etc etc.

We’d be lucky to draft a player as good as Bergman. Anyway it’s obvious I view him as a better player so will agree to disagree.

If the price is fair I think we should get him and I reckon he will be much better than many are making out.
Two other clubs I've read are interested are Dogs & Hawks, you know what they have in common? Absolutely stacked midfields… so they are looking for running defenders, something we have thrown a heap of currency around to have very good stocks.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Two other clubs I've read are interested are Dogs & Hawks, you know what they have in common? Absolutely stacked midfields… so they are looking for running defenders, something we have thrown a heap of currency around to have very good stocks.
Both clubs were also balls deep in the Rowell chase so I'm not sure they both think they have stacked midfields.
 
Both clubs were also balls deep in the Rowell chase so I'm not sure they both think they have stacked midfields.
The dogs have traded out more elite mids than we've had in 20 years, the hawks have Day, Newcombe, Worpel (who might leave for better opportunities), Ward, Nash & Cam McKenzie - we would kill for that kind of midfield depth.
 
There's absolutely zero, one poster said they hadn't seen elite traits yet and acknowledged it being far too early to make a proper opinion.
Nah I’ve seen enough people saying we’ve drafted another HBer and saying we should have gone for mids.
 
Because, if it is at all equivalent then I don’t know what point you are making.
As what would be true for Carlton would be true for us.
The point I'm making is that his own club doesn't value him as a superstar of the competition.

Yet St Kilda wants to make him the highest paid player in the competition.

And even if you think Saints have say, $2.5mil carry forward "use it or lose it" due to 95% and front ended contracts, even the remaining $10mil or $9.5mil over 7 years is still a lot more than Carlton is offering their own player.
 
I’d give a late first for Bergman in this draft.
Limited exposure, looks every bit a midfielder ready to break out. Age fits a list need.
I’d also trust that port offering him an 8 year deal speaks a fair bit about their level of confidence.
Just as likely to draft a bloke who’s delisted in 4 years time.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Nah I’ve seen enough people saying we’ve drafted another HBer and saying we should have gone for mids.
The mids we would've wanted were gone but Trav was a HBF to be fair

NAS wasn't a mid that turned out ok

I haven't seen any hate towards him
 
The dogs have traded out more elite mids than we've had in 20 years, the hawks have Day, Newcombe, Worpel (who might leave for better opportunities), Ward, Nash & Cam McKenzie - we would kill for that kind of midfield depth.
I agree. We aren't even close to having what they have in their midfielders.

Just highlighting that them pursuing Bergman doesn't mean they view him as a half back despite their midfield riches given who else they've been linked too.
 
The point I'm making is that his own club doesn't value him as a superstar of the competition.

Yet St Kilda wants to make him the highest paid player in the competition.

And even if you think Saints have say, $2.5mil carry forward "use it or lose it" due to 95% and front ended contracts, even the remaining $10mil or $9.5mil over 7 years is still a lot more than Carlton is offering their own player.
This is in essence why a ‘war chest’ has been accumulated - so we can afford to pay over the market price to bring high end talent through the door, as opposed to over paying the talent we already have on our list.

Essentially, it’s not surprising that we’re paying overs in contrast to the market or Carlton’s evaluation, as this is the strategy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top