Remove this Banner Ad

Review R16: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly vs. Richmond Tigers

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Also, Richmond recorded an xscore of +14.5, so they were lucky it was only a 68 point game. Our defense did an absolute number to the tigs. We also scored 82 points from turnovers as well.
 
I didn't get to see the ugly part of the game.

Is Max playing forward a way to get Murray into the team? Make him a legitimate swing man who is strong at both ends. Anyway, whatever the reason, I liked what I saw.

Curtin building from strength.

Thilthorpe's contested marking dominance.

Bewildering: Murphy at CBAs.... Unless Nicks knows about bruises and niggles and he's sending in a mature body to provide some relief.... Other than that I'm coming up empty.

ADHD sidequest: I seriously think that the AFL accreditation that assistant coaches need to do has a unit on mature bodies and experience. The number of coaches that are fixated on that is large. And while it is important, it's only one consideration. I think Walsh only was our only coach since Blight wasn't bound by this cookie-cutter playbook mentality. Nicks clearly has played youngsters, but Murphy over anyone was not necessary in this game. Smith, Laird and Tex are enough "wise heads".


Bad: We missed a lot of shots I thought we should have got.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I didn't get to see the ugly part of the game.

Is Max playing forward a way to get Murray into the team? Make him a legitimate swing man who is strong at both ends. Anyway, whatever the reason, I liked what I saw.
It would seem it was purely to play on Vlaustin.
He only had 3 intercepts which has only happened 3 times in 8 years.
 
I didn't get to see the ugly part of the game.

Is Max playing forward a way to get Murray into the team? Make him a legitimate swing man who is strong at both ends. Anyway, whatever the reason, I liked what I saw.

Curtin building from strength.

Thilthorpe's contested marking dominance.

Bewildering: Murphy at CBAs.... Unless Nicks knows about bruises and niggles and he's sending in a mature body to provide some relief.... Other than that I'm coming up empty.

ADHD sidequest: I seriously think that the AFL accreditation that assistant coaches need to do has a unit on mature bodies and experience. The number of coaches that are fixated on that is large. And while it is important, it's only one consideration. I think Walsh only was our only coach since Blight wasn't bound by this cookie-cutter playbook mentality. Nicks clearly has played youngsters, but Murphy over anyone was not necessary in this game. Smith, Laird and Tex are enough "wise heads".


Bad: We missed a lot of shots I thought we should have got.

Walsh was 100% bound by the same mentality as everyone else in his short tenure here. Football is about winning in the end of the day.

Hell as much as Adelaide lacked experience, we also had the oldest list in the league in 1998*. Though it was a different time and would have been the youngest in 2025. That said, the league has become more about hardened athletes since then, seeing how dominant zonal defense/pressure is, which has put a premium on experience instead of the mid-tier prospects.

PS: wrong one.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Ummm im liking this

You'll appreciate this a bit more than the average supporter but there is a centre clearance in the last quarter, that was on the back of him already being BOG that makes you get chills, he did this running in off the wing

Scroll to 19.18

 
Is it more important for him to play the best position for him or best position for team though ?
Good point
Should be both ideally but it's beside the point in this instance, selections make no sense
For example Smith, Murphy et al are neither best at their position as individuals nor best for the team so who knows what they're thinking
 
David King just gave his take on Lynch.

Reckons it has to be 4-5 weeks, it's a completely unacceptable action and given the AFL have changed 50 rules to protect the head the league has to come down hard on this.

I tend to agree, it's a minimum 4 weeks for me.

For Jon Ralph (who is a Richmond supporter) at half time on Fox Footy to try and laugh it off and push the narrative that it was only worth 2 weeks was a joke.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Review R16: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly vs. Richmond Tigers

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top