Yeah but our loser club has a pool next door so.....eat that Eaglesaccording to all the boffins he's not interested in coming to a loser club so he'll be staying at a loser club![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Yeah but our loser club has a pool next door so.....eat that Eaglesaccording to all the boffins he's not interested in coming to a loser club so he'll be staying at a loser club![]()
On paper, yes.negotiate a contract that's $600k a year lower than anyone else would pay.
Fair enough if money is the same and he prefers to go to Geelong or Hawthorn. Why wouldn’t you. However, if it is true that we aren’t willing to stump up the cash but Hawthorn are willing to, this annoys me. They have a much better playing list and more players who need a pay rise yet we aren’t willing to meet the market. Doesn’t make sense.![]()
Hawthorn “obsessed” with luring Reid from West Coast
There is frenzied interest in the young gun.www.sen.com.au
Essendon ruling themselves out because we don't want to pay $1.5m a year is a massive change in list strategy given we were the ones rumoured to be offering $2m/year
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
More likely to be journalistic error than a u-turn in list management.![]()
Hawthorn “obsessed” with luring Reid from West Coast
There is frenzied interest in the young gun.www.sen.com.au
Essendon ruling themselves out because we don't want to pay $1.5m a year is a massive change in list strategy given we were the ones rumoured to be offering $2m/year
More here: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...-scott-playing-the-kids.1333569/post-88828587Well, I think the simple answer to that, Mick, is that there wouldn't be a club in the competition that wouldn't have interest in a player of that caliber. You know, so, but I'm, my view on this is that, you know, probably my view has to change, because the reality is if you're not in the game these days, you're out of it. And, you know, my view has always been that players who are contracted to other clubs are committed to that club until they say otherwise. You know, and I haven't heard anything from Harley's management group that suggests he wants to be anywhere else other than West Coast. So until that time comes, we'll respect that. But if there was a time that like any player declared that they were on the move, we want to be in the game like everyone else.
End of 2028 would be 2 yearsConsidering what is being talked about is a 2 year deal with options attached with West Coast, I'm more than happy to load up on the draft now & bring him home at the end of 2027.
Feels like the idea of him leaving at the end of 2025 has been getting less and less every week, so this shouldn't really come as a shock.
1.5 is the new million. Get used to players getting huge deals, they’ll only get bigger. To get a Harley Reid type talent you have to pay big. And tbh 1.5 mill in 5-6 years won’t be that badYea nah. 1.5mill a year for a bloke who has given way as many free kicks as he does, no thanks.
![]()
Hawthorn “obsessed” with luring Reid from West Coast
There is frenzied interest in the young gun.www.sen.com.au
Essendon ruling themselves out because we don't want to pay $1.5m a year is a massive change in list strategy given we were the ones rumoured to be offering $2m/year
I agree. If we were further along and he was the missing piece that gives you a chance to challenge then it'd be worth it. But it's way too early for us to be spending that much. I hate to say it but Hawthorne are right in that window and he could help them get a premiership.I've wavered with Harley Reid. Not so much whether he'll be a great player or not but more so on whether its worth us burning through all our draft capital to go after him. I think we might be a bit early in our rebuild process for that. Not even considering whether its realistic that could even get him.
I personally think we should take our picks to the draft and give us a good base of talent to build around (along with seemingly successful last 2 drafts). Then potentially the next year and particularly the year after we can consider giving up more resources to bring in players.
I wouldn't be against a free agent pickup - but if we are losing Draper its probably not worth it because of the offsetting that would occur.
Same.I've wavered with Harley Reid. Not so much whether he'll be a great player or not but more so on whether its worth us burning through all our draft capital to go after him. I think we might be a bit early in our rebuild process for that. Not even considering whether its realistic that could even get him.
Carey was on a million a year in the 90's/00's. Reid is easily worth it. *Could become best in the comp.sounds like sanity prevailed
this kid isn't worth anywhere near 1.5m a year, let alone 2!
Carey was on a million a year in the 90's/00's. Reid is easily worth it. *Could become best in the comp.
We haven't had a player like that since - Hird
im about the same as you. For the first time since forever, the recruiting department is picking the right ty[es of draftees. Having as much collateral in the draft should be invested. If we could maintain a draft hand and get Reid then im getting interestHis last two games have been his best of the year after his interrupted preseason and general dickhead-ary.
Price needs to be right at the trade table and his contract.
I'd happily offer a 1st from this year and next year but not 3 firsts or more. No more than 1.5M as absolute max.
So, we can hit the draft if the reports are true.