Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 List Management discussion

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I legit wasn't aware of that

Brings some comfort

As I think he's an injury bust tbh
Yep agree. With all of my medical expertise. I just want him to be the generational forward lynchpin we were all hoping he'd be. That's just tail lights in the mirror at this stage. Have become super frustrated with him. Not his fault I know. Just the amount of hope and hype that was attached to him as a player to build a flag tilt around and the reality that he's looking like an injury bust with poor body language when he has been on the park.
 
$2 million is everywhere now, by next week it will be front loaded to even more. I just watched someone on the afl site say clubs are saying Nas is worth $2 million over the life of the contract not front loaded.
Does that mean he is getting paid $2m a season for the next 7+ years at either SA club?

It’s not the offer reported. It’s someone unnamed randoms belief.

Watch the footage again.
 
I completely understand where Stav is coming from--it could be a real cluster F in 2027 where we have lots of players out of contract with many potentially hitting elite/A Grade form and all wanting massive bucks (and being offered massive bucks from rivals).

However, I think if Nas says you have to give me $2million a season for 2 years, it will be a brave St Kilda to say no. Hence why we are between a rock and a hard place.
Imagine losing Nas because we were worried about this group coming out of contract:

Tauru, Hastie, Hill, Wilkie, Garcia, Clark, Sinclair, Steele, Macrae, Barrat, Collard, Henry, Wood, Marshall, Travaglia

Which players in there ^ are even remotely close to breaking the bank in 2 years?
 
Dude

Everyone wants Nas on a longer contract.

But you're the only one who wouldn't sign him for 2 years at 2 mil a year if that's the only way we could keep him.

Just you

The Lone Stavro

I salute you, oh rebellious spirit
I’m with stav on that point, not totally against 2 mill x2 years but let’s just not run away with numbers cos numpties in the media say so & we’re scared of losing a player.

It’s a low point of the season, everyone’s bored and finals are still a month away.

Gonna be lots of exacerbated news out there, take every number with a grain of salt and even then you don’t know the intricacies of the cap management across the list and other ways the contracts are handled/subsidised etc.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I’m with stav on that point, not totally against 2 mill x2 years but let’s just not run away with numbers cos numpties in the media say so & we’re scared of losing a player.

It’s a low point of the season, everyone’s bored and finals are still a month away.

Gonna be lots of exacerbated news out there, take every number with a grain of salt and even then you don’t know the intricacies of the cap management across the list and other ways the contracts are handled/subsidised etc.

So that contract or he leaves..... what would you do?
 
I’m with stav on that point, not totally against 2 mill x2 years but let’s just not run away with numbers cos numpties in the media say so & we’re scared of losing a player.

It’s a low point of the season, everyone’s bored and finals are still a month away.

Gonna be lots of exacerbated news out there, take every number with a grain of salt and even then you don’t know the intricacies of the cap management across the list and other ways the contracts are handled/subsidised etc.
Oh sweet summer child.

Imagine thinking you could be reasonable and level headed in here. Silly Minga ;)
 
I legit wasn't aware of that

Brings some comfort

As I think he's an injury bust tbh
You weren’t aware of it, because it’s seemingly not true.


“Until at least 2032”

It’s a nice cope, though.
 
The pages are going backwards. Was 817 now 814.
Can we agree to disagree on
1. Some will want the club to pay 2 mill for 2 years and worry in 2027
2. Some think that if we pay 2 mill for 2, there has to be an extra years trigger for the club and the 2 mill is front ended only.
Ok there are the two positions. Everyone go have a cup of tea and an Iced vo vo.
 
The pages are going backwards. Was 817 now 814.
Can we agree to disagree on
1. Some will want the club to pay 2 mill for 2 years and worry in 2027
2. Some think that if we pay 2 mill for 2, there has to be an extra years trigger for the club and the 2 mill is front ended only.
Ok there are the two positions. Everyone go have a cup of tea and an Iced vo vo.
Needs more cavity inhalation & hysteria.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

And in 2 years time after you have paid him $2m+ like you want and you no longer have the advantage of your 105% - how are you proposing we start making this work when Nas’s agent says he wants his client on an further increase?
105% is over a 4 year cycle I believe? Salary caps increase , player movements, player retierments etc.

Long term contracts are factored over the years of the length of contract isn’t it?
I completely understand where Stav is coming from--it could be a real cluster F in 2027 where we have lots of players out of contract with many potentially hitting elite/A Grade form and all wanting massive bucks (and being offered massive bucks from rivals).

However, I think if Nas says you have to give me $2million a season for 2 years, it will be a brave St Kilda to say no. Hence why we are between a rock and a hard place.
Are you telling me the list management team haven’t factored this in when they’re offering NAS a long term deal on decent coin?
 
Does that mean he is getting paid $2m a season for the next 7+ years at either SA club?

It’s not the offer reported. It’s someone unnamed randoms belief.

Watch the footage again.
It’s Riley beverage on gettable. He just said clubs he’s spoken to believe he’s now worth 2 million over the contract not $2 million front loaded. Port and Adelaide have both offered $2 million front loaded according to him, he also said people think port can do $2 million a year.

I sorry but I’m not going there and they will need to find a deal to make it happen. We need to put the acid on Nas and his manager, staying or going and if you’re leaving you better check your club of choice are willing to make it happen.

If port have to trade butters then so what, that could be made to work for us.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Does that mean he is getting paid $2m a season for the next 7+ years at either SA club?

It’s not the offer reported. It’s someone unnamed randoms belief.

Watch the footage again.
We could afford 2 x 7 without even breaking a sweat… we should be all in on this guy.
 
The pages are going backwards. Was 817 now 814.
Can we agree to disagree on
1. Some will want the club to pay 2 mill for 2 years and worry in 2027
2. Some think that if we pay 2 mill for 2, there has to be an extra years trigger for the club and the 2 mill is front ended only.
Ok there are the two positions. Everyone go have a cup of tea and an Iced vo vo.
I’d say like 2 people tops think option 2 makes sense but whatevs
 
I completely understand where Stav is coming from--it could be a real cluster F in 2027 where we have lots of players out of contract with many potentially hitting elite/A Grade form and all wanting massive bucks (and being offered massive bucks from rivals).

However, I think if Nas says you have to give me $2million a season for 2 years, it will be a brave St Kilda to say no. Hence why we are between a rock and a hard place.
I don’t think it’s going to be that bad in z2027. If we aren’t entering 2028 with a legitimate GF contender chance, we may as well rebuild again.


If this team is where it should be at the end of 2027, it should be easy to keep this group together to win a flag.
 
With all the differing angles and arguments for and against and whatever, I just can’t get away from Nas being the most exciting thing that’s happened to us in 15 years and if we were ever going to take a gamble on a high-stakes effort to retain a player, he’s the one. I think he’s leaving regardless but if he does, I hope it’s not because we didn’t try absolutely everything.
 
So they are paying 14 million over 7 years.
Fair dinkum you reckon I make shit up.

They have offered long term deals front ended. So have the Saints, but over 7 years it is not 2 million a year.

You are hilarious when it comes to numbers.

my god. is your reading comprehension that bad or are you deliberately being obtuse. you know the offer aint 14m over 7 years.

they're offering 2-2.4m a year for the first two years.

we have offered 1.4m a year for the first two years.
 
It’s Riley beverage on gettable. He just said clubs he’s spoken to believe he’s now worth 2 million over the contract not $2 million front loaded. Port and Adelaide have both offered $2 million front loaded according to him, he also said people think port can do $2 million a year.

I sorry but I’m not going there and they will need to find a deal to make it happen. We need to put the acid on Nas and his manager, staying or going and if you’re leaving you better check your club of choice are willing to make it happen.

If port have to trade butters then so what, that could be made to work for us.
Port will HAVE to trade Butters because there is no way they can afford 2 million a year in cap space without letting some big contracts go. There is no way in hell they have banked enough cap space over the last couple of years whilst attempting to compete at the pointy end of the ladder.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top