- Moderator
- #252
If your intent is to come in here and troll, think again as it won’t end well for you.
Anzacday Maggie5 Gone Critical
Anzacday Maggie5 Gone Critical
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Wouldn't surprise me if Steele actually comes in for Allan against MelbourneHe’s exactly what we’ve missed for weeks
The youthful exuberance
We really should have had he, Allan and Steele playing a lot more - would have been fantastic for their development and may have given s the drive we needed
Well we got ourselves into this mess, we can be the only ones that gets ourselves out of it, and embrace whatever happens from here...Definately. Who could imagine 6 weeks ago we are now relying on other results just to make the top 4. Also the likely scenario of Hawks in an Elimination final.
So he picked a sub who would only play if we were miles in front?Isn’t the answer pretty obvious? Fly either doesn’t think Allan is very impactful or doesn't yet trust him to not make a costly error when the game is in the balance.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Why didn’t someone ask Fly why we didn’t play Hill for at least part of the VFL game? We did it a month or so ago, he kicked three goals and then came back into the seniors with DeGoey. Then gets “gastro” (more than two weeks ago now) and is suddenly miles off being able to play.So if Hill doesn't play next week, and he isn't playing VFL, that means we don't see him again.
How can you possibly play any AFL game and perform without any base of match conditioning..
As l mentioned previously, l think there's a fair bit going on behind the scenes with Bobby, and his playing future ...
I just think this will be more of a story in the off-season, and we may learn more then. But l agree it's becoming an unwanted distraction, when it doesn't have to be, and getting weird, lol...Why didn’t someone ask Fly why we didn’t play Hill for at least part of the VFL game? We did it a month or so ago, he kicked three goals and then came back into the seniors with DeGoey. Then gets “gastro” (more than two weeks ago now) and is suddenly miles off being able to play.
Nobody believes the BS that is being spun. They should have just said that he is going on indefinite personal leave and left but at that, instead of spinning it into an implausible match fitness cover story.
How was it not HTB on Smith at CHF with a minute to go, tackled by Elliott then held it in with no attempt to get it out with McStay and Elliott both with a hand on him?
I’m an Allan fan. But by Fly’s actions, it’s hard to not conclude that he didn’t think that Ed was capable of turning things in our favour in such a tight, contested arm-wrestle.So he picked a sub who would only play if we were miles in front?
How many more players are we going to allow to derail our season with their personal issues?
Sadly, correct. If we don't pinch fourth, I think it's over red rover.The problem with finishing outside the Top 4 is that it likely results in an Elimination final vs the three teams who historically seemingly always have our measure more often than not: Hawks, Dogs, Giants. Gross.
That he gave Lipinski more than enough opportunity to impact the game. On reflection change should have been sooner.I’m an Allan fan. But by Fly’s actions, it’s hard to not conclude that he didn’t think that Ed was capable of turning things in our favour in such a tight, contested arm-wrestle.
What alternative conclusion could you possibly draw from it?
Who would you have subbed him in for and why?Isn’t the answer pretty obvious? Fly either doesn’t think Allan is very impactful or doesn't yet trust him to not make a costly error when the game is in the balance.

Spot on.NS these are not necessarily my views but we can spin information any way you want
If I was Nicks, this is how I would analyse these points in the review
- we gave them a 5 goal start and still in front at half time so in the future, no need to panic, we’ll get them
- they only scored 56 points against us, barely over 20 points in the following 3 quarters, do that again and we’ll beat them by more
- our plan of flooding D50 works brilliantly - they could have a hundred entries and and we’ll still get them on the rebound
- our clearance game was off and we still beat them
- I think we have more upside than the Pies bc we were down in so many areas and still won
Every coach “fears” the other teams in finals bc anything can happen but Nicks would fear us no less than any side in the 8 - why would he fear us more than any of the others?
By all means be positive NS but without watching the game how would you know what the context was behind the stats you quote?
It has been poorly handled by the club.I just think this will be more of a story in the off-season, and we may learn more then. But l agree it's becoming an unwanted distraction, when it doesn't have to be, and getting weird, lol...
Huh? I wasn’t saying we should have brought him on earlier. I was commenting on why Fly likely didn’t.Who would you have subbed him in for and why?
Allan is about territory where we were dominant. We needed a bloke who could take a mark up forward or a weasel small forward who could draw a high contact free.
Let's hope so! Shame to be losing games in the process though. Sounds like we're turning into Carlton and Cripps. FMD!Hopefully nicks goal at the end gives him the 3 brownlow votes. There was no one on the ground that was remotely even close to his level last night.
My point was more that we were dominating in the area that Allan could contribute to. I don't think it says anything about trust. There was just no tactical reason to bring Allan on.Huh? I wasn’t saying we should have brought him on earlier. I was commenting on why Fly likely didn’t.
For what it’s worth, Lipinski was definitely the guy I would have dragged. He was awful. I doubt there has ever been a softer player play so many games. He is a magnificent kick to a target inside F50 but is a liability in virtually every other regard. I would prefer him out of the team altogether. Bring in Roan Steele instead.
Exactly, had no intention of getting rid of ball, and an umpire is not giving a free kick in forward line, ( can’t give a free kick here, he would’ve said to himself) had it been at CHB, fair chance. They wear earpieces for a reason. To be frank, losing interest, umpiring determines the outcome of a lot of games, it was 16-5 after half time at one stage Fox put stat up on screen.How was it not HTB on Smith at CHF with a minute to go, tackled by Elliott then held it in with no attempt to get it out with McStay and Elliott both with a hand on him?
And hopefully with more system going into our F50. We can start by hitting up the man just outside or on the F50, and then look to hit up another short target inside F50, and not bomb it long to 30m in front of goal or to the forward pocket...Hopefully we beat Melbourne next week, go to Adelaide 1st week of the finals, last night will give us the confidence and then all pressure is on Adelaide in week 1![]()
Agree on Lipinski, in a game like that he was as useful as a hole in a bucket. We dropped WHE and we certainly DID NOT miss his hardness at the contest. Time for all the cleanskins to be shown the door.Huh? I wasn’t saying we should have brought him on earlier. I was commenting on why Fly likely didn’t.
For what it’s worth, Lipinski was definitely the guy I would have dragged. He was awful. I doubt there has ever been a softer player play so many games. He is a magnificent kick to a target inside F50 but is a liability in virtually every other regard. I would prefer him out of the team altogether. Bring in Roan Steele instead.