- Thread starter
- #5,801
What's that got to do with our team?How's that work at the Kangaroos?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
What's that got to do with our team?How's that work at the Kangaroos?
But we’ve got the key positions sorted, so not comparable at allHow's that work at the Kangaroos?
Did you read the post I replied to?What's that got to do with our team?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Considering the offer put to NWM, plus the fact that Melb would be picking up a % of Oliver's contract the $$ are certainly thereDid you read the post I replied to?
The Kangas have arguably the top ruckman in the AFL currently with a bevy of quality midfielders at his feet. As if we would have any chance of getting both a contracted Merrett and Oliver over the line, let's keep it real.
Where are you seeing Butts listed as an RFA?![]()
Draper: The unintended consequence of an Essendon admin error
The ruckman is still to make a call on his future.sen.com.au
I mentioned the other day I was surprised Butts was showing as a RFA when OOC next year. Now ASSUMING that’s right it’s probably the opposite to this situation where a Reidy has ensured Jordan’s last year of contract is in top 25% of all players and therefore becomes a much more valuable RFA. Having a crappy list manager (Dons) can cause so much damage
Then explain why Merrett would uproot his life and move to Adelaide when he can basically choose his club of choice without the stress if he was unhappy at the Bombers...and that's if Essendon would even consider letting him go under contract?Considering the offer put to NWM, plus the fact that Melb would be picking up a % of Oliver's contract the $$ are certainly there
Yes was footy wire, and another poster did warn me of the same thing hence me saying “assuming” but sounds like we can discount footywireWhere are you seeing Butts listed as an RFA?
Footywire are notorious for getting RFA vs UFA status wrong. They typically seem to assume that anyone coming out of contract for the first time (after qualifying for FA) is an RFA. They certainly don't have access to player salaries, so they have no way of knowing where players sit in their club's salary structure - and therefore whether they qualify for RFA status.
I suppose it's theoretically possible that Butts has a massively backloaded contract, resulting in an abnormally high salary in 2026 (the final year of his contract), qualifying him for RFA status. It's possible... but highly unlikely. I really can't see how Butts is getting paid enough to qualify for RFA status.
He looked closely at moving to Port just recently so the moving clubs interstate isn't a hassleThen explain why Merrett would uproot his life and move to Adelaide when he can basically choose his club of choice without the stress if he was unhappy at the Bombers...and that's if Essendon would even consider letting him go under contract?
Do you really think the Demons new coach is going to want a contracted Oliver gone or that the list management are that desperate to boot him that they will be prepared to pay a decent slice of his salary to play against them? I don't.
No current season stats available
That wasn’t the point of your post, it was loading up on the midfield like North. We haven’t neglected our key position players at all, the one area of weakness is our midfield and ruck. So if we load up on mids it’s not comparable to North at all.Did you read the post I replied to?
The Kangas have arguably the top ruckman in the AFL currently with a bevy of quality midfielders at his feet. As if we would have any chance of getting both a contracted Merrett and Oliver over the line, let's keep it real.
The AFL media are generally pretty good at RFA vs UFA status. Presumably they have access to AFL data which Joe Public (and Footywire) do not. Of course, this would require them to publish an article where Butts' FA status is mentioned, and it's unlikely that this would happen until next year (when he comes out of contract).Yes was footy wire, and another posted did warn me if the same thing hence me saying “assuming” but sounds like we can discount footywire
Is there a better source you are aware of for 2026 FA? Logic says he shouldn’t be a RFA
Would love Merrett but it would cost and has a relatively short shelf life. Lloyd on Footy Classified said “2 x top 15 picks” re his value.He looked closely at moving to Port just recently so the moving clubs interstate isn't a hassle
There is no chance they would trade him to Hawthorn or Collingwood
If he wants success then Adelaide is a perfect destination
Oliver has been trying to get out for ages we all know this....
Where are you seeing Butts listed as an RFA?
Footywire are notorious for getting RFA vs UFA status wrong. They typically seem to assume that anyone coming out of contract for the first time (after qualifying for FA) is an RFA. They certainly don't have access to player salaries, so they have no way of knowing where players sit in their club's salary structure - and therefore whether they qualify for RFA status.
I suppose it's theoretically possible that Butts has a massively backloaded contract, resulting in an abnormally high salary in 2026 (the final year of his contract), qualifying him for RFA status. It's possible... but highly unlikely. I really can't see how Butts is getting paid enough to qualify for RFA status.
Yes was footy wire, and another poster did warn me of the same thing hence me saying “assuming” but sounds like we can discount footywire
Is there a better source you are aware of for 2026 FA? Logic says he shouldn’t be a RFA
Footywire simply don't know the value of players contractsThe AFL media are generally pretty good at RFA vs UFA status. Presumably they have access to AFL data which Joe Public (and Footywire) do not. Of course, this would require them to publish an article where Butts' FA status is mentioned, and it's unlikely that this would happen until next year (when he comes out of contract).
Getting Merrett would put us in the window for the next 3 years.Purple reporting that Zac Merrett wants out
Make it happen Reid
That tops us off
![]()
Draper: The unintended consequence of an Essendon admin error
The ruckman is still to make a call on his future.sen.com.au
I mentioned the other day I was surprised Butts was showing as a RFA when OOC next year. Now ASSUMING that’s right it’s probably the opposite to this situation where a Reidy has ensured Jordan’s last year of contract is in top 25% of all players and therefore becomes a much more valuable RFA. Having a crappy list manager (Dons) can cause so much damage
Then explain why Merrett would uproot his life and move to Adelaide when he can basically choose his club of choice without the stress if he was unhappy at the Bombers...and that's if Essendon would even consider letting him go under contract?
Do you really think the Demons new coach is going to want a contracted Oliver gone or that the list management are that desperate to boot him that they will be prepared to pay a decent slice of his salary to play against them? I don't.
Aren't we supposed to still be in the race for Sam Draper as well, going to be some elite list management by Reid to get all 3 over the line without salary cap issues.
He does turn 30 this year.Getting Merrett would put us in the window for the next 3 years.
Cmon afc make it happen.
Lots of fair questions. My view:Then explain why Merrett would uproot his life and move to Adelaide when he can basically choose his club of choice without the stress if he was unhappy at the Bombers...and that's if Essendon would even consider letting him go under contract?
Do you really think the Demons new coach is going to want a contracted Oliver gone or that the list management are that desperate to boot him that they will be prepared to pay a decent slice of his salary to play against them? I don't.
Aren't we supposed to still be in the race for Sam Draper as well, going to be some elite list management by Reid to get all 3 over the line without salary cap issues.
Sounds like every baby boomer politician for the last 30 years creating unsustainable debt that future generations will be crippled by! Re backloading, its not smart and removes a lot of flexibility in the future to look at picking up opportunities that may arise (ie try not to be 100% fully invested at any point). And fire sales getting cents in the dollar is a very silly list management posn to ever put yourself inYou just do a Collingwood and kick the can down the road by backloading. And when the chickens come home to roost, it's fire sale time. But if you've banked a flag, sins are easily forgiven.
Thats where Tiges nailed it last year. In theory anyway. Was it 7 top 25 ish picks AND with the Kangas stupidity now have 2 picks in the top 3-4 this year also. They have front run both Tassie and a number of other aging (Dees and Pies) or troubled (Blues, Dons) lists that need overhaulsIm not sure its Essendon's choice, but it certainly seems like could easily join Carlton and probably Melbourne in the firesale clubs this year.
If all 3 firesale at once we'll know the imminent Tassie team arrival is really playing on the middling teams list managers. This year is really their last chance to start an effective rebuild before its too late.
Yep, Id not be surprised if Richmond leapfrog all 3 of those sides next year too. Its rare that firesale sides go anywhere but down the next season.Thats where Tiges nailed it last year. In theory anyway. Was it 7 top 25 ish picks AND with the Kangas stupidity now have 2 picks in the top 3-4 this year also. They have front run both Tassie and a number of other aging (Dees and Pies) or troubled (Blues, Dons) lists that need overhauls