- Jun 4, 2016
- 14,593
- 45,345
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Literally all of those things are 'coaching'. Coaches are managers too....Coaching??????
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Literally all of those things are 'coaching'. Coaches are managers too....Coaching??????
I think the club is going through a reset, and the bold is a realistic expectation, as we have one eye more firmly on setting up future success. Any improvements we make in 2026 to the ladder position would be inconsequential.Pick 6 and Walter would be one of the biggest trade hauls ever. Walter is a top tier talent, of similar worth to JJK when we moved him onto WCE for Judd. Young KPF of his ability don’t grow on trees. I see him as a Charlie clone but 8 years younger.
The problem with doing this deal is we are basically resigning ourselves to treading water or regressing in 2026, so the club need to assess whether the trade would be worth it based on that. We can potentially cover the loss of SOS and TDK but losing Charlie would be too much.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Politefully agree to disagree.Pick 6 and Walter would be one of the biggest trade hauls ever. Walter is a top tier talent, of similar worth to JJK when we moved him onto WCE for Judd. Young KPF of his ability don’t grow on trees. I see him as a Charlie clone but 8 years younger.
The problem with doing this deal is we are basically resigning ourselves to treading water or regressing in 2026, so the club need to assess whether the trade would be worth it based on that. We can potentially cover the loss of SOS and TDK but losing Charlie would be too much.
Unfortunately, I doubt that with HOF doing his knee.
As for TDK, he plays as another mid... Pitto is incapable of this, he doesn't take marks, he's no presence up forward and very slow. It only compounds the weaknesses of our main mids, whereas TDK had the ability to alleviate that to an extent.
Maybe I'm being naive or bias, but my expectation is to still make the 8 next year while performing a little resetI think the club is going through a reset, and the bold is a realistic expectation, as we have one eye more firmly on setting up future success. Any improvements we make in 2026 to the ladder position would be inconsequential.
I'm not as concerned about 2026 as I am about the following years. The Club needs to get this right.
Agreed. After I wrote that message I thought the same thing. Pick 20 is def not top end. I just feel we need proven talent back if we’re handing proven talent overI wouldn't be calling 20 a top end pick... they drafted Tony Notte iirc and I don't recall there being someone they missed with that pick either.
Potential doesn't always work out, 100% true, but you'd rather bring players with big potential in than not.
Walter was a pick 3 in 2023 draft. The pick 6 we get can be combined with the TDK pick to push up to pick 2. So we lose Charlie + TDK for two top 3 picks, it's not the worst result.
If Walter lives up to the potential and that pick 2 gets us Duursma then we've done very well.
My thoughts exactly.Opium will be happy![]()
Agreed. After I wrote that message I thought the same thing. Pick 20 is def not top end. I just feel we need proven talent back if we’re handing proven talent over
It’s a reset, not a rebuild. Completely different to 2015
Club has realised what we have this year and prior won’t cut it, no point going with the same and expecting a different result
Been looking at the draft and young players for last 2-3 years and will again this year, next year get Cody and go free agents with the huge amount of money we’ll have in the bank

Judd wasn't contracted....Judd went for 3, 20 and Kennedy.
Judd had more value than Curnow does, but it's very similar...
Maybe… just maybe, the AFL have never intended to do a Round 1 F/S draft lockout and this has all been media clickbait since the very beginning. And if that’s the case, the AFL have simply never needed to come out with any statement on the matter because they have never considered doing it?
It's possible if we hit close to peak Cripps, Walsh, Cerra again. McKay stays on the park (even losing Charlie, he plays better without him). Hewett maintains the rage. Weiters stays healthy as does Haynes and Pitto. Followed by some growth from Cowan, Ollie, Moir, Carrol, and basically new recruits in Jagga, Cotters, and Kemp.Maybe I'm being naive or bias, but my expectation is to still make the 8 next year while performing a little reset
Walter is every bit as athletic as Charlie, also gives way more care to the defensive side of the game.Higher goals per game than CC at the same stage of his career, though not nearly as athletic as Charlie
I think Walter and pick 6 for Curnow who will be 29 at seasons start is probably a good result for us, and Charlie is my favourite Carlton player ever after Fevola
Judd wasn't contracted....
l believe that looks difficult with the players we are losing this year.Maybe I'm being naive or bias, but my expectation is to still make the 8 next year while performing a little reset
I haven't seen enough of Walter admittedly, but he has looked more awkward off the deck than Curnow and doesn't look to have the same run and jumpWalter is every bit as athletic as Charlie, also gives way more care to the defensive side of the game.
I hope it’s true, yes it will affect our ability over the next year or two to contend but we aren’t contenders anyway, will help with a reset enormously.
I doubt GC would give pick 6 straight out as they need valuable picks, but that doesn’t mean we can’t skin it another way
I think Charlie to GC will happen, so the good thing is we can do several different trade scenarios with them because of the amount of young talent they have. Now that GC are a finals side, they would probably be even more into a player like Charlie Curnow. He elevates from finals contender to flag contender overnight.Walter v Charlie, risk v reward both ways but could also be a win win. We've had meh Charlie for the last 2 season, prior 2 good season and before that 3 years of injury. If he doesn't want to be here next season who's to say he'll mentally be fully checked in anyway and not do usual Charlie silly things like snapping without taking a moment, riding to games on a scooter without a helmet, basketball in the shower.
We've stated we want people that want to be at the club, "no bs". Think the club has already alluded to their decision, just got to wait till contenders are out of finals and trade week radio kicks off.
If I was a reporter I'd be following Curnow's manager around like a fly on poop.
No, that was a rebuild….first time ever that word was uttered within the walls of PP…But not a 66 game reset?![]()