Clark haters are awfully quiet.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
He's no good for us. We have young players ahead of him, and as I said during the week, I doubt he'd manage the expected work rate at Geelong. The only thing of note that he's done was a blind turn around Selwood in his first few games.Watching the replay.
Do we really want Worpel. He looks shithouse.
Let it go, mate.Clark haters are awfully quiet.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Not a Clark hater but I could not understand the selection over Bews etc.Clark haters are awfully quiet.
Best promo guy in the land.
For sure. However, for me, it's get in your car and drive eight-hundred kilometres down the highway.Can always hang out at the Chinese across the road with the best people.![]()

I know, I was being aHa no, the ones inside. They did it for 22 and there were alot of hangers on there.

I loved his mark that wasn't his mark because Danger was pushed. It was a beautiful contested clunk, with the dukes fully stretched out.Just watching the replay for the first time.
The contested mark and goal from Neale in the second quarter is genuinely huge.
Just genuine one on one skill to clunk that and goal from 45.
This kid is going to be such an asset.
We wouldn't be here without him.
I know, I was being a
Did you go to the one in '22? I was at the game and got blind in the CBD. Still barely remember getting the train back to Geelong.
He's no good for us. We have young players ahead of him, and as I said during the week, I doubt he'd manage the expected work rate at Geelong. The only thing of note that he's done was a blind turn around Selwood in his first few games.
A few have piped up in the i was wrong thread, but also, if we had lost I think the same performance would see him cop a bit of a roast for some of the turnovers. Not just that one out to the wing but a couple where he had time and space but didn't take it and blasted it instead.Clark haters are awfully quiet.
Don't forget, he also clunked one in the first quarter, but the free to Danger for the push out negated itJust watching the replay for the first time.
The contested mark and goal from Neale in the second quarter is genuinely huge.
Just genuine one on one skill to clunk that and goal from 45.
This kid is going to be such an asset.
We wouldn't be here without him.
One thing I can't understand is the stats sheet for him. Should have been 2 goals sure but he only 3 disposals.Just watching the replay for the first time.
The contested mark and goal from Neale in the second quarter is genuinely huge.
Just genuine one on one skill to clunk that and goal from 45.
This kid is going to be such an asset.
We wouldn't be here without him.
He barely touched it. Not worth discussing I would have thoughtClark haters are awfully quiet.
If both are out, Stanley and Bews could work. Mr Fixit in defence and part- time ruckI think we can cover Stewart but if Henry doesn’t get up it would be a big challenge to cover both.
I’d bring Stanley in, help us in the ruck and give more options to deploy Blitz where he needs to go.
One thing I can't understand is the stats sheet for him. Should have been 2 goals sure but he only 3 disposals.
I feel like he had a lot more influence that that.
Quality post.He barely touched it. Not worth discussing I would have thought
Yeah felt like Barrass never ended up anywhere dangerous. It's the performance that we want him to do on Harris Andrews but he never pulls it off on himMost importantly, he didn’t allow Barrass to take uncontested marks at will. Brought the likes of Stengle and Close into the game in particular.