Because the AFL is becoming more and more, and faster, a business based on US sports models.I'm losing more and more interest in the AFL every year, and to be honest things like father/son are aspects that I do enjoy and that keep me interested. Daicos boys at Collingwood is great, great players, and I find it interesting. Sure our sworn enemy, but it is super cool to have that legacy. Think that is a unique rule that we have in our game that help with that legacy/heritage and I just don't understand why the AFL want to make it harder for these things to happen.
I know there is the argument around fairness/draft manipulation etc. but its not like the father son rule is not there for every club in the competition to access and use. Every Victorian club plus Brisbane (Fitzroy +academy) and Sydney (South Melbourne +academy) has the same advantage at this point, and then clubs like GWS and Gold Coast have strong academy rules that more than compensate. If anything Adelaide, Port, Freo, and West Coast are at the least disadvantage here but surely that can be worked through? (even still those four clubs were established in the late 80'/90's and would have some father son eligibility these days - Andrew Walker made his debut in 2004).
There is no room for sentiment (although they cleverly spin it that way to keep us all locked in) and it more about the dollars they can generate. The media, particularly SEN, is also locked in on this and sells it for the AFL.
I used to think Dwayne Russell was unbiased and fair, and let anyone have their say, but in recent months he is selling everything the AFL is putting down and disagreeing with callers who call this stuff out.
(Just today playing down the momentum shifting 'non-free' for Elliot's front on contact).








"Goddess" 