iBeng
Intentionally left blank
- Apr 3, 2012
- 59,334
- 68,855
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions

Im sure he'll at least have a crack at the Norm!
Oh wait, shit, sorry OP
Oh wait, shit, sorry OP
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
LOL Isaac Smith won a normie and played in plenty of premierships... are u saying hes better than all of them?Will is the one with Norm Smith and a chance at another this week yeah?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I would help enlighten those that are seeking answers ... Humans are easily manipulated and extremely lazy ... you see these, witness everything put in front of you ... and not ask any questions ... proving my point above ... ignorant and low IQ people ... ignorant and low IQ people ... controlled ... the evidence ... this is the game they play ... watch as the AI bots and human bots come in ...
Remember when you wanted Smith banned a week ago and then he was 2nd BOG in a prelim.My interest in the Brownlow is minimal these days, good luck to Matt Rowell for winning the great mid fielder award of the 21st century. No doubt he is a worthy winner, however some of his 3 vote performances were suspect, but the Umpires are not really going to vote for anyone else other than a midfielder.
With my team in the Grand Final this week i wonder why I'm extremely concerned that a player like Tom Stewart is not playing instead of Max Holmes or Bailey Smith?
The game isn't always about midfielders!
Which is exactly why inside mids keep winning. Game is stopped, and umpires can see those first possessions or repeat stoppages and see who is on bottom of packs.With 4 umpires on the ground they are only focussed on 1/4 of the ground each, how can they then possibly be expected to judge who was the best and fairest play on the field. They have far bigger priorities when trying officiate than working out who played best.
In a past life I umpired at senior suburban level and would walk of the ground most games with absolutely no idea who was the best player on the ground and would inevitably guess or just pick the usual suspect best midfielder.. I used to tell my mates who played, the easiest way to get votes is to run around calling out your own name.
Or simply back the midfielder with over 26+ possessions who leads the free kick count at a top 10 club? Won 4 of the last 5.So why do you not lay the favourite on Betfair and make loads of money?
Taranto 20 votes is just plain stupid
Soon to be 'Downward Spiral'"Spiral out". Handle checks out.
Oh, another offended Collingwood fan.
Don't worry chief, just a few more 1-2s with his brother and he'll get there.
Soon to be 'Downward Spiral'
Hardly an outsider averages more contested possessions, more centre clearances, more total clearances, more tackles, better disposal efficiency, much higher player rating. I think he was 2nd in the betting maybe a month ago..Given how closely AFL and gambling companies are intertwined, it honestly wouldn't surprise me if the AFL 'encouraged' these sorts of unexpected outsider outcomes. Everyone loads up their $$$ on The Usual Suspects, so when the outsider wins, the betting companies pocket all the money and don't need to pay out much.
It was interesting how the entire AFL media was talking up Daicos, Smith, Dawson, Anderson etc....there was barely any mention of Rowell at all.
Yeah I knew the human bots would latch onto the fact my profile shows I'm a Collingwood supporter.
All good mate, keep trying and one day you'll do something with you life and be remembered for greatness.
My theory is umps do a lot of their votes at half time and 3qt, and at 3qt they wouldn't have even thought of Nas as the margin was so big. And then when they convened post match they would've just thought Nas had a great last qtr but didn't play a full game. Definitely the biggest non 3 I've ever seen.
this.I've got no problem with the umpires voting on it, it's an umpire's award, BUT the boundary and goal umpires being excluded cuts out another perspective that would be valuable and not totally focused on midfielders.
brayshaw has been just as good as serong this year.Just come to say thankyou to whoever did the freo count and had brayshaw taking it over serong
made me go down a rabbit hole of if serong gets fkd - how much could brayshaw overpoll - similar to the rowell> anderson shafting
ended up taking brayshaw for top 5 @140s+ and rowell winner overall amongst a few other things and come out just shy of 2.5k on brayshaw alone
Q1: 8 disposals 1 goalI like how people say to take the voting off the umpires and give it to a panel or something, yet everyone loses their mind over the AA team every year.
The Brownlow is probably the 'purest' award for the simple fact that umpires vote on who they thought was the best, without the benefit of stats.
Best for them probably translates to most impact for 4 quarters, simply from being on the ground.
Whilst I agree the NWM 2 votes appeared a howler, maybe the umps did think Viney had the most impact across the entirety of the game and chose to give him the 3 votes over a mostly 1 quarter effort, as good as it was.