- Aug 31, 2014
- 16,788
- 31,298
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Not trade news, just a laugh

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.

The bigger issue is the length of contract and wage.Yep
We need more average non dickheads
Where did jordy fit into the classification a few years ago after he got back from new York ?
We can offer all we want for him but if they think his a key piece for their first flag he ain’t getting tradedAbsolute rubbish, suns have said multiple times Humphrey is untouchable, plus we have no capital to trade for him.
If Port match, the club he wants to go to has to negotiate a trade.You dont understand the free agency model, do you? He doesnt get a choice if they match. That's the difference between restricted and unrestricted. If Port matches he has to stay.
We must have told them to t*nk, whoops, I meant not to get injured.McCarthy has slid, same with McGuane and Saxena. Read the latter two are looking like rookie selections.
At the moment he is expected to go 35-45
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Xander is a clownAbsolute rubbish, suns have said multiple times Humphrey is untouchable, plus we have no capital to trade for him.

If he doesn't spend two years out with foot problems, it's an upgrade.I think they erred with their list management. I suspect they were happy with Gibcus, Miller and Young as the primary options and they have a lot of talls so were happy to move on from Blight. Curveball comes along with Young moving to WC and all of a sudden the call to delist looks questionable. I’m not convinced this is a good because it’s a real sideways one from Dean, but the cost is hopefully a rookie list spot so not one I’ll be questioning.
This is spot on!We’ll have to pay up for Oliver with either salary or trade capital. Melbourne aren’t going to pay his salary AND give him away for nothing.
Good point, I completely forgot that Spargo existed lolActually it’s more likely they’ll want to trade for him so their FA compo for Spargo doesn’t get diluted.
Absolutely!He looked good in the QF. I wouldn’t take any notice of the prelim after that hit. A big pre season and he’s virtually an elite trade acquisition
I would far sooner Petracca than Oliver.Adelaide will end up with one of Petracca or Oliver.
Once a team matches, free agency is off the table and it's an uncontacted player requesting a trade.
So if it's Butters you're chasing, you've got to be prepared to pay the trade price unless you can afford an unmatchable salary.
Not trade news, just a laugh![]()
I doubt it is a test we will take on. Will be interesting to see what Melbourne ask for him. We traded Grundy for pick 27.
Oliver is one season away from entering Elvis mode.For a start Oliver ain’t a plodder he’s quite quick.
There is too many players who’s form has fallen off at Melbourne for there not to be an issue down there.
It’s not just Clayton, you have Trac, Lever? May, Van Rooyen and Petty who have looked ordinary for a while now.
It’s too much of a coincidence and I’d love for us to be able to turn Oliver around.
The club has tried to get rid of him 3 years running, I know how I’d feel if I were him.
Other than having a tofu addiction.And Grundy had no off field issues
That boat sailed away last year.I would far sooner Petracca than Oliver.
Trac at least isn't a total *******.
This is spot on!
Certainly does , comes with glass shouldersHe kicks the ball well.
Then why didn't they let him go to Geelong last year?One has to wonder why he didn't get the hint the first time.
They wanted too much.Then why didn't they let him go to Geelong last year?
You said this:Yeah this is it, and what I have been pointing out for a fair while last few pages.
Rather silly in hindsight isn't it?Then why didn't they let him go to Geelong last year?
Exactly. Thank you.You said this:
"You dont understand the free agency model, do you? He doesnt get a choice if they match. That's the difference between restricted and unrestricted. If Port matches he has to stay."
"He has to stay" Is not pointing out that he then has the choice to either stay, leave via trade, or nominate for the draft.