Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
The lack of news on this is disappointing at this point in time. That gives the impression of mismanagement.
We've been "into" Marshall for ages. I don't doubt that we have had plans as such, but actually convincing someone to hop down the highway...They should have thought of this earlier though, Conway has had two season long injuries. There should have been plans started last year.
we should be in on this but we wont as we got nothing they want.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Mm, we did manage to get Dangerfield, Smith and Cameron. We're doing ok on the trading-in front.Yep, equalisation at work. Succeed as a club and you get starved of opportunities.
But some are more equal than others.
Huh? Are you seriously insinuating that there is an anti-Geelong bias when it comes to free kicks?Meek likes to go in with the knees. He'd never get away with it at Geelong.
Mm, we did manage to get Dangerfield, Smith and Cameron. We're doing ok on the trading-in front.
Mm, we did manage to get Dangerfield, Smith and Cameron. We're doing ok on the trading-in front.
I disagree. We just got the guy who finished second in the B+F and won the Coaches' Award for a pretty ordinary pair of picks, and I assume we in are Zac Butters up to our eyeballs.We've done ok, but the noose is steadily tightening.
I have a conspiracy theory that the only reason Melbourne held on to Clayton Oliver last season was because he wanted to be traded to the Cats. There was no way they'd let us have a midfielder of Clayton's quality. If Oliver had asked to be traded to another club (especially clubs like Norf, Saints, WCE), I suspect a deal would have been done. I am pretty sure that even though Curnow wants to come to Geelong, Carlton is saying to him anywhere but there. Note: these are conspiracy theories only.We've done ok, but the noose is steadily tightening.
The good thing about bringing in an established player is you don't have to guess how he'll hold up against a specific club.Is it just me being too focussed on how the midfield performed in the GF, but seriously, keeping the same midfield and adding worpol and bruin is NOT going to fix that full surrender we got. Unless there is genuine improvement in there (for example Humphries continuing his incredible growth and kicking into the midfield), we will have a solid home and away midfield and a crap finals one - the prelim was basically Dangers full effort more than anything else, and when he didn’t fire a shot in the GF, we were exposed. While I’m at it - if I hear one more positive arguement on flexibility of players I’ll spew up. Where was that felxibiliy when we were getting slaughtered at attacking the ball in the GF? Where was the throwing around the magnets in the hope of getting back in the game? If they were there, none of them worked, underlining that our whole coaching panel had a shocker as well, from selection night through to the end.
Adelaide, Gold Coast, Hawks and GWS all seem to be focussed on adding high end talent to their midfields this offseason - I just feel all this attention around worpol, bruin, etc is masking our slide down the midfield pecking order as shown in the GF.
Not sure Jack would be pissed off. It would be an opportunity for Oli. I think they all understand how the industry works and no player is bigger than the club. It could have a negative impact on the culture for sure. Or it might be fine. Billy Smedts was traded to Carlton for Zach Tuohy. Chapman, Kelly and Johnson not given contracts in their final years. It happens, its no hard feelings.So you’d piss off Jack by trading his brother who only just signed with the club a few years ago?
In the case of at least two of those players, I believe there were actually truckloads of hard feelings.Not sure Jack would be pissed off. It would be an opportunity for Oli. I think they all understand how the industry works and no player is bigger than the club. It could have a negative impact on the culture for sure. Or it might be fine. Billy Smedts was traded to Carlton for Zach Tuohy. Chapman, Kelly and Johnson not given contracts in their final years. It happens, its no hard feelings.
I don't think the media or the footy team did itself any favours by revealing that there was a meeting at Stanley's farm.I have a conspiracy theory that the only reason Melbourne held on to Clayton Oliver last season was because he wanted to be traded to the Cats. There was no way they'd let us have a midfielder of Clayton's quality. If Oliver had asked to be traded to another club (especially clubs like Norf, Saints, WCE), I suspect a deal would have been done. I am pretty sure that even though Curnow wants to come to Geelong, Carlton is saying to him anywhere but there. Note: these are conspiracy theories only.
Free agents (restricted or not) are different obviously, as the club that player comes from doesn't hold the power in those negoatiations (although in restricted FA's they can match the bid, but it rarely happens).
Reeves?
Yes, and we got through it.In the case of at least two of those players, I believe there were actually truckloads of hard feelings.
I think the Cats are not being overt about Curnow because they burnt themselves badly over Oliver last year. He would have been very handy on GF day.I have a conspiracy theory that the only reason Melbourne held on to Clayton Oliver last season was because he wanted to be traded to the Cats. There was no way they'd let us have a midfielder of Clayton's quality. If Oliver had asked to be traded to another club (especially clubs like Norf, Saints, WCE), I suspect a deal would have been done. I am pretty sure that even though Curnow wants to come to Geelong, Carlton is saying to him anywhere but there. Note: these are conspiracy theories only.
Free agents (restricted or not) are different obviously, as the club that player comes from doesn't hold the power in those negoatiations (although in restricted FA's they can match the bid, but it rarely happens).
I don't think the media or the footy team did itself any favours by revealing that there was a meeting at Stanley's farm.
From MFC's perspective, it was offensive that the Cats almost overtly stated that they could help Oliver.
If we were a bit more lowkey about it, then we had more chance than the flatout refusal.
There is a good lesson to be learned by the club in alot of our highlighted in the media issues. A bit of hubris and just keeping your head down and not saying anything should be the way to go for future.
But those blokes were all left without a 500k a year job... OH will be still getting paid.In the case of at least two of those players, I believe there were actually truckloads of hard feelings.
I went to footywire thinking, "Surely they'll have something for him ..."Worpel cant spread, kick or win the hardball.
THIS!!! THIS!!!
This is the bloke we should be going hard for.
Bailey Freakin Humphrey!!!