Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 Trade/FA Thread (Cont’d)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You can get special dispensation if the player you are trading for is young like Humphries.

Only thing is that GCS would want more than just one future first. I think our future first and Beau is the only thing that would get them interested. And I don’t want to lose Beau.

No to Beau leaving!

But who else might be a possibility? The veterans won't get it done and the others we really need. Would we get anything for Mihocek leaving?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

We won’t put a player we literally just signed up a day or so ago up for trade. If nothing else it’s a culture killer, won’t happen. You’re talking nonsense.
Not to mention the aggressive feedback to the club from the fans who just celebrated Jamie putting pen to a new deal.
Would be an horrendous look.
 
Not to mention Jamie himself is unlikely to agree to the trade. It would be incredibly disrespectful to even expect that he would entertain the idea after he has recently made one of the most important decisions of his life to commit to the club.
 
Not to mention the aggressive feedback to the club from the fans who just celebrated Jamie putting pen to a new deal.
Would be an horrendous look.
They'd never do that. Was the most ludicrous suggestion I've read on here in a while. And that's saying something 😆

Humphrey is currently on $600k a year. He's likely just trying to get his current contract with Suns re-negotiated.
 
I reacted to TakingThePies with poor attitude. I can’t see a point to his post other than acting like a troll.

  1. Elliott is now a contracted Pie, FA status was not pursued.
  2. Elliott wanted to be a Pie. Accepted under the Suns offer in years and $
  3. Elliott is 32 years old and as a trade does not hold much value. He may enable a trade but will not fill the pies component.
  4. For the trade to happen Elliott must want to leave. What would change his current want to say?
  5. Petracca is GC bound, what $ for Elliott remain.
  6. For Humphrey/Elliott trade to occur what else does Collingwood supply? It would be further player(s) or trading future picks with another club involved, GC wants players.
  7. The circumstances of the GC trade for Elliott have passed and don’t apply to now.
  8. Elliott is a popular pie, something would die in the team.
  9. Humphrey is contracted.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Now you're talking! I use to swig it on the way to footy 20 years ago. Got pulled up 5min from my destination and blew just on .05, town was an hour away. She asked when my last drink was, I said 2 1/2 hours ago 🤭
Unlucky
 
You know what I didn’t have on my bingo card someone putting Elliott’s name out there 2 ****ing days after he re-signed 😂

I’ve read some batshit crazy stuff in my time on here, but that legitimately takes the cake. You could put any player on the list forward not named Daicos and they are more likely to be traded than Elliott. That would be the most unprofessional decision I’ve seen in the game and set us back 5 years. Absolute madness!
 
If you had just had a swig a few minutes before it was probably mouth alcohol.
Where else would you put it?


Hang on are you connoisseur of the shelve ?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So, whilst wouldn’t get much for him there’s a small chance Dees would trade pick for Checkers if Trac or Clarry and May go too? So not to water down any compo pick they may get?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 Trade/FA Thread (Cont’d)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top