Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 List Management

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Happy to give the recruiting team the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise. There wasn't a gun held to their heads to make this trade, there would have been other options to get a pick to trade for McVee so it's not the end of the world yet.
 
I would say 19 and 23 for 12? We should be keep 33
Twomey already said losing 33 as part of it and looking at the picks, the only waylosing 12 and 33 is reasonable if we dont get 16 is getting 19,22 and 23
 
12 and 33 for 19 and 23? Seems straight garbage to me
That 33 is a very hidden gut punch. That's, at best, 12 & 33 For 19 and McVee. Definitely not the worst we've been shafted but it's a shafting nonetheless even it's minor.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Twomey already said losing 33 as part of it and looking at the picks, the only losing 12 and 33 is reasonable if we dont get 16 is getting 19,22 and 23
But his first tweet also suggested we’d slide from 12 to one of the Eagles picks (22 or 23) as opposed to 19.

I don’t think he currently knows the whole trade and is bizarrely assembling the news in public for some reason (I guess to report it first?)
 
Sorry for the intrusion lads, but any additional insight into why you guys wanna move back 10-odd spots in the first round?

Posters on our end reckon you want additional picks for McVee but...giving up pick 12 seems a bit "nice" of you?

Whats the go?
We're really stoned and think that 23 is better than 12 because it's a higher number.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 List Management

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top