List Mgmt. Brady Rawlings | Head of Football Talent (Recruitment, LM & TPP)

[Zondor]

He will

It’s time you get him the arse Mr north man. :stern look

 

[North1411]

All these FA compensation picks pushing that second we got from Richmond further and further down the order. It could be what? 27 and 25 for pick 3. Great work Brady.

But we got Charlie Spargo so there's that moment of glory.

Well to be fair it is now pick 4

 

[Zondor]

Well to be fair it is now pick 4

From Pick 3. So what number will this pick end up being? :stern look

 

[North1411]

From Pick 3. So what number will this pick end up being? :stern look

Who cares about that, what you should care abou is if there is a player available at pick 4 that you would pick over Whitlock

 

[Zondor]

Who cares about that, what you should care abou is if there is a player available at pick 4 that you would pick over Whitlock

Listen up yah ****. Don’t go telling me what I should care about. I asked a simple question. How far will our original pick 3 drop in value?

 

[Only Forwards]

Listen up yah ****. Don’t go telling me what I should care about. I asked a simple question. How far will our original pick 3 drop in value?

Not far enough to make the Daniel’s trade worth it.

 

[Zondor]

Not far enough to make the Daniel’s trade worth it.

Thanks OF.

 

[perplexed]

He better not f***ing blink on the Jy stuff.

More likely to sneeze

 

[tales129]

 

[North1411]

Listen up yah ****. Don’t go telling me what I should care about. I asked a simple question. How far will our original pick 3 drop in value?

Wow, eat a snickers Zondor. I don't care how far pick 3 drops that's irrelevant. What is relevant is what that pick would get.

Wherever it ends up, would the player it gets be better than Whitlock? If not then it was a good move, if they are better then, yep it was a bad move

 

[Epictetus]

lol. We're so desperate to feel like we're competent.

Our captain is half arsed looking for a way out. We're either stuck with his ridiculous contract (that we offered) and the captaincy is stripped and he plays shit footy or we accept a few middling picks in a shit draft.

Always ahead of the game!!

 

[Zondor]

Wow, eat a snickers Zondor. I don't care how far pick 3 drops that's irrelevant. What is relevant is what that pick would get.

Wherever it ends up, would the player it gets be better than Whitlock? If not then it was a good move, if they are better then, yep it was a bad move

Jam your snickers up your arse. I’ll give you, “I don’t care”. You cared enough to initially post the following. “Well to be fair it is now pick 4”. And without the benefit of hindsight I put it to you that trading a future first, which was always gonna be a top 4 pick in the following draft, was moronic. Regardless of how bad some of the so called draft experts reckon this upcoming draft pool is. :stern look

 

[Blightys Barrel]

Jam your snickers up your arse. I’ll give you, “I don’t care”. You cared enough to initially post the following. “Well to be fair it is now pick 4”. And without the benefit of hindsight I put it to you that trading a future first, which was always gonna be a top 4 pick in the following draft, was moronic. Regardless of how bad some of the so called draft experts reckon this upcoming draft pool is. :stern look

I now can’t get this visual out of mind - an inserted Snickers up an arse. Was it the extra nuts, or the standard?

 

[North1411]

Jam your snickers up your arse. I’ll give you, “I don’t care”. You cared enough to initially post the following. “Well to be fair it is now pick 4”. And without the benefit of hindsight I put it to you that trading a future first, which was always gonna be a top 4 pick in the following draft, was moronic. Regardless of how bad some of the so called draft experts reckon this upcoming draft pool is. :stern look

Zondor its big footy, its all just opinions, probably not something to get this worked up over . Regardless of that, drafts aren't equal year to year, so picks aren't equal year to year. Like when we traded out of a great 2019 draft into a below average 2020 draft. Even if we won that trade points, it was a bad trade.

Taking out if this a weak draft or not and forgetting about the magic points system. Is Whitlock better than any other tall available at pick 4 or is there a player at pick 4 that you would take over him. Thats the only question over the success of this trade. Now I take it from your comments that you think the players this year are better than Whitlock, regardless of if they are a tall or another midfielder

 

[DocSholl]

Is Whitlock better than any other tall available at pick 4 or is there a player at pick 4 that you would take over him. Thats the only question over the success of this trade.

The argument is whether we could have gotten Whitlock last year without giving up a premium pick this year with more foresight and smarter trading, which I suspect the answer to is yes.

 

[Sphynx]

The argument is whether we could have gotten Whitlock last year without giving up a premium pick this year with more foresight and smarter trading, which I suspect the answer to is yes.

Of course it’s yes.

He went 10 selections after our natural second rounder.

We could have simply done absolutely nothing last offseason and still ended up with FOS, Whitlock + Pick 4

 

[North1411]

The argument is whether we could have gotten Whitlock last year without giving up a premium pick this year with more foresight and smarter trading, which I suspect the answer to is yes.

Possible, we tried splitting pick 2 to move back, we definitely over payed for Caleb, but other than walking away from that deal, which in hindsight based on this year's form would be a good idea, the trade is a reflection of what most clubs think of this year's draft

 

[Zondor]

The argument is whether we could have gotten Whitlock last year without giving up a premium pick this year with more foresight and smarter trading, which I suspect the answer to is yes.

Thank You. :stern look

 

[Zondor]

Zondor its big footy, its all just opinions, probably not something to get this worked up over . Regardless of that, drafts aren't equal year to year, so picks aren't equal year to year. Like when we traded out of a great 2019 draft into a below average 2020 draft. Even if we won that trade points, it was a bad trade.

Taking out if this a weak draft or not and forgetting about the magic points system. Is Whitlock better than any other tall available at pick 4 or is there a player at pick 4 that you would take over him. Thats the only question over the success of this trade. Now I take it from your comments that you think the players this year are better than Whitlock, regardless of if they are a tall or another midfielder

Stop your presumptuous nonsense. It’s laughable to think that I’m getting “worked up” over any of your ramblings. :stern look

 

[Jimmy's Hot Dogs]

I now can’t get this visual out of mind - an inserted Snickers up an arse. Was it the extra nuts, or the standard?

Doesn’t matter.






It satisfies.


I’ll see myself out.

 

[hilly]

is there a player at pick 4 that you would take over him.

Disingenuous argument.

 

[Dinkers]

Jam your snickers up your arse. I’ll give you, “I don’t care”. You cared enough to initially post the following. “Well to be fair it is now pick 4”. And without the benefit of hindsight I put it to you that trading a future first, which was always gonna be a top 4 pick in the following draft, was moronic. Regardless of how bad some of the so called draft experts reckon this upcoming draft pool is. :stern look

Suppose I was the only one reading that as ' knickers' . I was taken aback. Then I lol'd

 

[hilly]

I was taken aback.

 

[North1411]

Disingenuous argument.

Picks were given a value when they introduced the matching mechanism for F/S and academy players. For every other trade the value of them is irrelevant. It is about what player you get with it compared to the player you project to get with the one you are giving up. Hence the equation North did last year is, was Whitlock more valuable to the team than the players they projected to go early this year.

So it's not a disingenuous argument. However, your post is disingenuous and lazy

 

[hilly]

Picks were given a value when they introduced the matching mechanism for F/S and academy players. For every other trade the value of them is irrelevant. It is about what player you get with it compared to the player you project to get with the one you are giving up. Hence the equation North did last year is, was Whitlock more valuable to the team than the players they projected to go early this year.

So it's not a disingenuous argument. However, your post is disingenuous and lazy

Turn it up 'who is better at pick 4'.