- Mar 1, 2010
- 25,856
- 19,363
- AFL Club
- Richmond
vision??Retscho a genuine a grade athlete
Very happy with this, will play on the wing in round 1
is that the incoming trade for 99??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
vision??Retscho a genuine a grade athlete
Very happy with this, will play on the wing in round 1
Correct. RND 1 VFLRetscho a genuine a grade athlete
Very happy with this, will play on the wing in round 1
We shall see, training over the summer, as well as practice match form, will determine who plays round 1 at AFL level. If this guy shines, he will play for sure as players that play wing is a big need for us imo.Correct. RND 1 VFL
It’s not about “lack of data” or “drafting notes”. It’s that he wasn’t even in the elite programs throughout his full junior career. There’s not the body of work there, so the risk is much higher and must factor in to some degree.RT, it is not about having a boy. You have actually argued two different things here. First you said the club may not be as keen because there is no years of data on Robey. Then you shifted to him being a late bolter and whether the improvement is sustainable. Now you are making it about me.
My point from the start has been simple. The absence of years of junior notes should not drag down their judgement of what he is producing now. That is the inflexibility I am talking about. Lindsay had all the junior hype and years of data behind him and he is the one sliding.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Lmao those stupid WCE fans spent the past four weeks trying to convince BigFooty they were in the front seat for Gold Coast’s first pick. Unlucky you bunch of campaigners.
Should trade 38 for Gold Coast future 2nd (tied to Dees) and pick 52 this year (Kellaway bid match).Gold Coast have 6 picks that will be absorbed in matching bids: 15, 18, 24, 28, 29, 36
Pick 15 might become 25 & 26 (from North) which means 7 picks being used to match academy bids
Brisbane will lose 17 & 23 when matching Annable
Pick 38 will probably move up a couple spots with earlier picks now used to match bids.
Yes should get overs for pick 38 and not bid on their academy players.Should trade 38 for Gold Coast future 2nd (tied to Dees) and pick 52 this year (Kellaway bid match).
Gee who would have thoughtGC ended up with enough points to match bids for both Uwland and Patterson, even if the bids come at picks #1 and #2.

After trading out pick 37 in the Petracca deal they are now short by 277pts if bids come at 2 & 4.GC ended up with enough points to match bids for both Uwland and Patterson, even if the bids come at picks #1 and #2.
Yep must be comfortable either going into deficit or trading the futures they've accumulated for more points.After trading out pick 37 in the Petracca deal they are now short by 277pts if bids come at 2 & 4.
If there were bids at 1 & 2 they'd be 1160pts short which is right on the cusp of the maximum that they can go into deficit.
Not necessarily. WC will not bid at pick 1, quite possibly at 2. It would be matched and even if they bid again at 3 it would be matched. GC would still have approximately 6 or 7 hundred points left + 11 hundred points available in deficit. Coulson, Addinsal and Murray will not go that early and therefore could still be available to GC.Yep must be comfortable either going into deficit or trading the futures they've accumulated for more points.
Seems like Coulson, Addinsal and Murray will all be available in the open pool.
Addinsall getting bid on early could be the one that ****s them I guess. If someone just went around 12-15 theyd probably pass.Not necessarily. WC will not bid at pick 1, quite possibly at 2. It would be matched and even if they bid again at 3 it would be matched. GC would still have approximately 6 or 7 hundred points left + 11 hundred points available in deficit. Coulson, Addinsal and Murray will not go that early and therefore could still be available to GC.
I am not as convinced Whitlock would go top 10 this year as some. Maybe but not a given IMOAs much as North are probably deluded in a lot of ways, they’re probably not wrong. I’d still prefer pick 3 thanks North, but Whitlock would’ve been projected to go pretty high in the open pool this year, it being a far less exciting draft and bereft of talls.
Really think we lucked out last year, our haul was special.
Reckon he would be well after Schubert who looks borderline top 10 at best.I am not as convinced Whitlock would go top 10 this year as some. Maybe but not a given IMO
I am not as convinced Whitlock would go top 10 this year as some. Maybe but not a given IMO