Lore
Moderator ❀
- Dec 14, 2015
- 48,920
- 73,343
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Moderator
- #10,220
There we go, that's the clip:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Think in the case of DGB as an example. It’s understandable to think someone can move past those limitations with pre seasons of development into those physical aspects. The case was that it didn’t happen, and it was a serious limiting factor.Right, so your talent identification wasn’t good enough to pick up said limitations then but is now?
It’s improved so much that despite saying with certainty KPP’s sorted for the next decade 4 years ago and being horribly wrong, when you say it now I should believe you.
Cool.
I think this reflects more poorly on Essendon than it does us....
they just didn't want to win nowHawthorn aren’t desperate to blow up their future for Merrett no.
10 (2025, F1 (2026), F1 (2027) 1st 22 (2025), and F2 is just unfathomably high and purely laughable.
3 firsts is overs but bearable. 4 and a second is just wow.I actually think we were, and we almost did but Walsh came in with the save.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Merrett doesn’t guarantee a flag, Hawthorn can win it with or without him. What giving up four firsts and a second does is significant set you back in terms of your future. There are always trade offs. Some more reasonable than others.they just didn't want to win now
No current season stats available
Don’t care how the AFL try to frame it. When you hand out extra picks and push teams back the picks lose value
Maybe for you, was making my stomach turn but was willing to back in the club.3 firsts is overs but bearable. 4 and a second is just wow.
While I agree Merrett doesn’t guarantee a flag, they won’t win one without him.Merrett doesn’t guarantee a flag, Hawthorn can win it with or without him. What giving up four firsts and a second does is significant set you back in terms of your future. There are always trade offs. Some more reasonable than others.
Hawthorn have two firsts this year and one of their best players and an A Grader, is a mid season draft pick. Hawthorns development has always been strong.Yes, Gold Coast have double digit top 10 picks from the last 4 years including this one to make/improve their team.
Hawks have?
Laughable.While I agree Merrett doesn’t guarantee a flag, they won’t win one without him.
exactly,Merrett doesn’t guarantee a flag, Hawthorn can win it with or without him. What giving up four firsts and a second does is significant set you back in terms of your future. There are always trade offs. Some more reasonable than others.
Hawthorn have pick 13 and 22 this year, GC have two top 3 picks.Hawthorn have two firsts this year and one of their best players and an A Grader, is a mid season draft pick. Hawthorns development has always been strong.
There’s no doubt a lot of improvement, development and added depth/talent to a number of clubs, especially contenders. To ignore that for some and not for others is again an interesting angle to lean.
Essendon wantedpick 10
2026 first
2026 2nd
2027 first
for Merrett and scraps would have got it done, Sydney paid up for an inferior Charlie Curnow
Hawthorn have pick 13 and 22 this year, GC have two top 3 picks.
A laughable comparison.
one of their best players and an A Grader, is a mid season draft pick. Hawthorns development has always been strong.
You are genuinely delusional if you see the Hawks having more natural improvement than GC.Laughable.
Three first round picks and Will Hayward! Significantly better offer than what we were subject to.Yep 2 first rounders and Hayward a best 22 player and then Florent on the side as a bonus
Essendon need top end talent, which is exactly what 10, 22 and a F1 get you.exactly,
Essendon dont need picks for the now. They just debuted 15 players in 2025. mature players would be more beneficial, good players not fringe or unproven ones.
Correct sir, we hit our limit yesterday and then tried something to try and make it more enticing. In the end we didn't have a GC bag of draft picks to offer.So Hawks were told yesterday 9, F1, F2 and HH for Zac wasnt enough so changed their offer to 9, 22, F1, HH for Zac and a F3?
Is it just me or is that basically the same offer?
Essendon didn't seem to approach any players from any clubs across the entire trade period except Fiorini.I get Essendon supporters saying the deal came late so we didn’t have time to convince a player of note to want to come to Essendon, but we all knew this was a prospect for weeks, Essendon could have been proactive the weeks leading up to trade to find someone (maybe they did and nobody cared)
No winners here, Hawthorn huge chance to get a player that could make the difference in a premiership tilt, Essendon a huge chance to cash in on a disgruntled player & it’s not like having him has worked out, they aren’t a contender & for Merrett, he has problem done everything he can to help Essendon succeed over his career and it’s just hasn’t worked from a team point of view & now he is stuck, but probably should have addressed this prior to his last contract so he made his bed to a degree