Tiger_Of_Old
THE_GUN:"Why don't you use your reg acc"7/9/24
its only a numberId be fine with Taylor at 7. Not at 4.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
its only a numberId be fine with Taylor at 7. Not at 4.
b
Robey is more Lalor than Smillie. In fact besides being tall, SMill and Robey have eff all in common IMOTwomey on Gettable reckons clubs shouldn't reach with early picks. Richmond should take Robey and reckons that he compliments Lalor and is also a different type of player to Smillie.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Sonsie was a Richmond supporter also and that worked out well.people are seduced cos hes a Richmond supporter .
Imagine taking a defender so early !
CRAZY!!!
This is word for word what Cal saidRobey is more Lalor than Smillie. In fact besides being tall, SMill and Robey have eff all in common IMO

But has more dignity and honor than you will ever haveSonsie was a Richmond supporter also and that worked out well.
He is softer than a marshmallow.
thats where u take defenders and later , not top farrken 5

whateverYou would take Taylor before you take Grlj with our picks.
if we are taking a defender whats the differenceShould we trade 4 for say pick 15 to pick up a defender?
What would Twomey know.Twomey on Gettable reckons clubs shouldn't reach with early picks. Richmond should take Robey and reckons that he compliments Lalor and is also a different type of player to Smillie.
Not sure how desperate our 'Need for speed' really is and is it worth reaching what could be 5-6 spotsChanged my vote from Cumming and Grlj to Sharp and Grlj.
I feel like Grlj is a must even though we typically don't draft for needs. We need speed and considering Blair said as much when he was asked about missing out on Malcolm Rosas Jr, it seems clear to me it's a priority.
Sharp is the most consistently well performed out of the entire draft class over the past few years. So much so I was hearing great things about him two years ago.
I'm not a Robey hater by any means, really impressive kid and can already tell he will be a future captain somewhere by the way he carries himself.
I'm just a bit nervous about him coming from the clouds like he has and burning a high pick on him with the lack of exposed form compared to someone like a Sharp.
Ultimately, I'm happy with any 2 of the 3.
If CDT is available then I have NFI what I would do lol.
I agree with Ruckman thats a no no in my book.if we are taking a defender whats the difference
its more likely a defender in the teens becomes a gun of the comp going off draft history . taking defender , tall forwards and ruckman in top 5 is lunacy
Its is, but so are most years.I agree with Ruckman thats a no no in my book.
This years draft is just full of ? marks.
Don’t agree with the view that it’s too early on GrlJ. It’s not as though there’s a standout screaming pick me at 4.Would be happy with any combo of Robey, CDT, Sharp with our current picks.
I like Grlj a lot, but 4's a bit early for him. Hopefully both Essendon and Melbourne really want whoever's left at 4 and we can slide it out a bit and still take him.
Id say there's a clear top 4 in terms of talent. Its just if we value the need over talent.Don’t agree with the view that it’s too early on GrlJ. It’s not as though there’s a standout screaming pick me at 4.
You look at upside and needs and accept he ticks as many boxes as anyone else in this range
We're debating over kids who would be hard pressed to land in the top 10 last year though.Its is, but so are most years.
last year whilst considered deep, apparently had not stars, 12 months is a long time in footy and last years draft could be one of the best ever.
Maybe, but I look at it this way, if you’re critiquing players in that say 4-8 range, you can find deficiencies in all their gamesId say there's a clear top 4 in terms of talent. It’s just if we value the need over talent.
This is why I rate him at 4 for us. I just dont think Essendon does so if we can get something for it and still get Grlj, let's do itMaybe, but I look at it this way, if you’re critiquing players in that say 4-8 range, you can find deficiencies in all their games
Sharp, Cumming, Taylor etc…
Grlj looked very good to me playing for our 2s. Had no issue with physicality of VFL v Coates, and showed dare off hb/wing. I think at the very least you are getting a hb/wing with elite speed/endurance at best developing into a mid with those qualities
I’m taking that.