The whole point of a discussion board is to engage critically, we’re allowed to question the validity of ‘mail’ when it goes against everything reported so far, and point out his ‘track record’ was the heavily reported Rioli and Bolton deals. Also the source last year was someone working in the media team?
Again, very easy to read the tea leaves of already reported stuff, and make a bet on things occurring.
All mail is welcome, like you said prodigy (hang on I thought you quit this thread), it creates discussion, but part of the discussion will be fairly questioning the source.
Again, very easy to read the tea leaves of already reported stuff, and make a bet on things occurring.
All mail is welcome, like you said prodigy (hang on I thought you quit this thread), it creates discussion, but part of the discussion will be fairly questioning the source.





