Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Draft thread - 2025 (remaining picks: 29, 34)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Live draft hand
R1: 1 (Duursma), 4 (CDT), 19 (Lindsay)
R2: 29, 34
RD: 1

Draft picks pre-draft
R1: 1, 2, 13
R2: 34, 41
RD: 1

List spots available
Main list: 2 (includes Duursma, CDT, Lindsay)
Cat A Rookie list: 1 (expecting Robertson, Macrae and Schoenberg to join as SSP signings)
Cat B Rookie list: 1

Draft order

Draft prospect video highlights (thanks to noobermensch)

Rookie Me Central 2025 Draft Guide


Matthew Clarke on Gettable 17/11


Cal Twomey’s Phantom Draft

 
Last edited by a moderator:
We have a lot of explosive players and players who excel at metres gained as it is.

I dont think its necessarily a turn off.
As long hes not a liability in transition or in defence(which I dont believe he is) he would be fine.
Literal opposite. His elite running for an inside mid sees him getting to defense quite often .

Tracking back is my concern with Sharp
 
Err, posted a 6:15 in the 2km and finished top 10 in both jump tests.

He's also taller than Rowell and is quite muscular already.

He's a northern academy prospect and his physical conditioning is ahead of guys elsewhere, especially those from WA.

Neale and Rowell are absolute units and you need to be picking guys on the assumption they won't develop that way.

Zero chance Sharp has better disposal, Addinsall is clear. Very good off both feet within 35M.

Addinsall handball game is better and more expansive.

He has a terrible drop, ball speed is low, trajectory inconsistent.
 
We have a lot of explosive players and players who excel at metres gained as it is.

I dont think its necessarily a turn off.
As long hes not a liability in transition or in defence(which I dont believe he is) he would be fine.
You lot were referencing a lack of these attributes to knock Sharp just recently, and now they don’t matter because we have enough that when it comes to someone else?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

He's a northern academy prospect and his physical conditioning is ahead of guys elsewhere, especially those from WA.

Neale and Rowell are absolute units and you need to be picking guys on the assumption they won't develop that way.



He has a terrible drop, ball speed is low, trajectory inconsistent.
Had a very injury interrupted year and still finished top 5 in the 2km. He would be first with full fitness surely.
 
You lot were referencing a lack of these attributes to knock Sharp just recently, and now they don’t matter because we have enough that when it comes to someone else?
Yeah one would’ve been taken at 4 and the other at 19, makes a difference don’t you think?

If we were getting Sharp at 19 I think everyone would be over the moon and gladly overlooking his deficiencies.
 
You're obviously a fan, but you're living in hope as far as output goes.

Addinsall is crafty but he's small and unathletic, the kicking skills are below the required level and technically poor. Stylistically yes, there's a lot of Neale but his AFL career has been possible due to his build and that's not something that you can project.

He's an outside chance of having a long AFL career and lacks the size, skill and athleticism needed to warrant a top end selection.
so he’s not AFL-standard in 2 of the same ways as Sharp? Infact I’m pretty confident he’s better athletically than Sharp. Definitely smaller though
 

Posted on the Hough pick in 2021. Ochre then proceeded to give this tired unfunny joke a rest by posting it on every other pick that was made, and a dogshit meme was born.

View attachment 2479052
It’s beautiful.

I had a HoneyBadger informative reply in the top 5 so this is a great result
 
You lot were referencing a lack of these attributes to knock Sharp just recently, and now they don’t matter because we have enough that when it comes to someone else?
If you actually paid any attention to what I said before, youd have known that I was always fine with Sharp at pick 3 or 4 if we had it.
I was never against Sharp, only against him at pick 2.

Jog on bud, you and most of the other Sharp pick 2 fans here seem to just intentionally ignore that the only thing myself and other CDT pick 2 people have been saying is that we dont want Sharp at pick 2.
 
Yeah one would’ve been take at 4 and the other at 19, makes a difference don’t you think?

If we were getting Sharp at 19 I think everyone would be over the moon and gladly overlooking his deficiencies.
When one is much better at the attributes we desperately need then that difference doesn’t matter as much.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

It’s funny how people were saying Sharp was a reach at two referencing all the mocks and rankings.
Are the same people now saying Addinsall is better than Sharp and is a great pick at 18 when most mocks and rankings had him in the 30’s.
Imo the difference between 17 or 18 or whatever our 3rd pick is, is minimal to the 20-30 area that Addinsall was rated.
CDT + Addinsall is way better than Sharp + someone roughly equivalent to Addinsall
 
Imo the difference between 17 or 18 or whatever our 3rd pick is, is minimal to the 20-30 area that Addinsall was rated.
CDT + Addinsall is way better than Sharp + someone roughly equivalent to Addinsall
It’s be CDT and Addinsall or Sharp and Schubert I suppose in the like for like aspects

Easy decision really
 
We have a lot of explosive players and players who excel at metres gained as it is.

I dont think its necessarily a turn off.
As long hes not a liability in transition or in defence(which I dont believe he is) he would be fine.

I think we're incredibly poor at closing exits close to stoppage. Now that's got to be partly because we don't keep width properly, I think numbers keep getting sucked to the ball because we're not fleet of foot in the numbers needed.

In don't think Addinsall makes a difference either way as he's obviously good at hunting the ball and we've not rectifying this massive problem with personnel changes. It's the ability of feed off a team mates good contested work and getting dangerous offensively from inside to out without slowing play and compromising ball movement that worries me.

After watching Simmo's tactics for years I've got low tolerance for slow play from clean ball.
 
It’s funny how people were saying Sharp was a reach at two referencing all the mocks and rankings.
Are the same people now saying Addinsall is better than Sharp and is a great pick at 18 when most mocks and rankings had him in the 30’s.
His range is 20-30. He's also an academy prospect and those blokes tend to drop back in the order a bit.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Imo the difference between 17 or 18 or whatever our 3rd pick is, is minimal to the 20-30 area that Addinsall was rated.
CDT + Addinsall is way better than Sharp + someone roughly equivalent to Addinsall

Actually don’t mind the CDT Addinsall combo, just thought it was ironic that Addinsall would be championed so much after bagging Sharp.
 
I think we're incredibly poor at closing exits close to stoppage. Now that's got to be partly because we don't keep width properly, I think numbers keep getting sucked to the ball because we're not fleet of foot in the numbers needed.

In don't think Addinsall makes a difference either way as he's obviously good at hunting the ball and we've not rectifying this massive problem with personnel changes. It's the ability of feed off a team mates good contested work and getting dangerous offensively from inside to out without slowing play and compromising ball movement that worries me.

After watching Simmo's tactics for years I've got low tolerance for slow play from clean ball.
Addinsalls highlights are all about quick movement and decision making. You can be fast in mind not just in legs and Addinsall shows that. Watch his video and watch out quick he is to move the ball on…
 
It’s funny how people were saying Sharp was a reach at two referencing all the mocks and rankings.
Are the same people now saying Addinsall is better than Sharp and is a great pick at 18 when most mocks and rankings had him in the 30’s.
I said it before but everyone rated all the academy kids lower because they are not draftable. Dean wasn’t even in the top 20 at the start of the year and the only reason he is rated now is because Eagles are bidding on him

For me Annable is pick 1 in this draft as a example and because Brisbane are involved people can’t admit it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top