- Jul 5, 2012
- 30,389
- 51,930
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Kidding, right?
I suspect it’s a bit of both.The Teals are the product of a number of things but not only did Labor deliberately and strategically 'run dead' in their gettable seats but was tactically involved in their inception and campaigning.
The Labor strategy on Trump/Dutton was Albo allowing himself to play the milksop to Duttons strongman.
This ended up being a trap Dutton couldn't resist nor escape from as in the light of the post US election chaos Albanese instead of looking weak now looked stable, instead of looking cowardly now looked sensibly cautious.
The voice was THE focus of every reactionary media personality and for more than half of Labors first term.
It was a loss for the 'bleeding hearts' for want of a better term and arguably cost Albo some political skin but mainly with people who were never voting for him anyway.
It also gave the Coalition a false sense of confidence and bravado with what they considered a 'huge win' and vote of confidence in them but most of the electorate considered a non issue and a distraction.
I do however think it was originally intended as a wedge for the Coalition to consolidate Teal support.
Most of this is quite obvious to even a casual political observer.
I get the impression you think parties release their strategic plans on their website?
Or possibly I'm wrong and Albanese is just the luckiest son of a bitch on earth who has never indulged in any political skulduggery and simply walked out of a You Am I concert and into the lodge?




