Expected. Last one in, first one out. Not many replacement players stick around past their initial year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
All the teams around us AND above us (North) looking to get better with player acquisitions. But it's ok, we got interest in a medium sized forward from Carlton when we're down two speedy ball carriers with ACL's next year![]()
I like your summary and thoughts on list needs.Dumb article. Experience? Prowse is the most experienced, had four years only. Skepper's had about two years, ditto Peters, ditto Slocombe but she's only played one game.
We're doing the Moneyball strategy - looking for bargains, players who were worth a high pick a few years ago but have slipped a long way through no fault of their own. I reckon the reason we didn't get Prowse or Zanker is because other clubs are throwing much higher draft picks at them, while we want to keep top picks unspent unless someone really great is available.
Big bodied midfielder? We've already got two, but Rentsch and Painter are playing back and forward respectively. So we don't actually want a big bodied midfielder, we want someone like Prowse who can help release Rentsch into the midfield, or a forward who can help Painter do the same.
I like what I'm seeing. A lot of clubs are dumb, they'll spend top picks for older players who'll help in the short term, but leave them struggling in a few years time because they missed out on great young talent to do it. We're going after players with big upsides, looking to create value rather than just harvesting existing value.
One of my assumed de-listings from a couple weeks ago's been made official. Such a shame she couldn't stay healthy enough for a proper run.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yeah, I thought she was a good acquisition from Geelong but the injuries really seemed to set her back.
So that's 4 spots gone with Hosking, Hooker, Johnson and Lindgren. Two more that I thought we might hear about are McDonald and Drennan. Are they both out of contract?
I tend to agree to some extent but I'm more than happy to give up more value for players who you can pencil in for quite a few years, like Prowse who is 24. North gave up a late first for Libby Birch and a late 2nd round pick, which to me is well worth doing for a proven good player in her mid 20s.Dumb article. Experience? Prowse is the most experienced, had four years only. Skepper's had about two years, ditto Peters, ditto Slocombe but she's only played one game.
We're doing the Moneyball strategy - looking for bargains, players who were worth a high pick a few years ago but have slipped a long way through no fault of their own. I reckon the reason we didn't get Prowse or Zanker is because other clubs are throwing much higher draft picks at them, while we want to keep top picks unspent unless someone really great is available.
Big bodied midfielder? We've already got two, but Rentsch and Painter are playing back and forward respectively. So we don't actually want a big bodied midfielder, we want someone like Prowse who can help release Rentsch into the midfield, or a forward who can help Painter do the same.
I like what I'm seeing. A lot of clubs are dumb, they'll spend top picks for older players who'll help in the short term, but leave them struggling in a few years time because they missed out on great young talent to do it. We're going after players with big upsides, looking to create value rather than just harvesting existing value.
Yeah, 2 years would have seemed right to me, especially for a player who would be 35 in the third year of the contract. I'm guessing there will be some sort of announcement about Drennan separate to this, either that she's retiring or is being re-signed for one more year. (I do feel like the latter is unlikely given that she disappeared for the last month plus of this season)I'd count Lindgren and Hosking as one spot since we lost Hosking and Sophie Mac and only replaced them with one player. Maybe they're backing McDonald to overcome her concussion woes, though one game in two years isn't very promising.
And who knows with Drennan. I just assumed traded in players got two year deals which was the case for Johnson.
Skepper was pick 17, Peters was 23, Slocombe 26. We won't have to trade anything like that high to get them, which is what makes it such a smart drafting strategy. I'm guessing the club doesn't want four more rookies this draft given how young we already are. Getting players who have at least been pros for 2 years means we aren't quite so inexperienced, but we don't want to be drafting any oldies, either.I like your summary and thoughts on list needs.
We don't need to spend large trade capital on players unless they are super stars of the comp.
None of the players we are missing out on are worth the asking price.
If we can land Sophie Peters, Keeley Skepper, Ella Slocombe and still keep our 1st round pick that's a good strategy.
They are automatic players for the club and better than the bottom half of our list from my little bit of research.
Correct me if I am wrong but all these players are equivelant to 2nd round picks and Skeeler would be the highest cost?
Future picks are available so dip into 2026 to make it happen and keep 1st rounders in 25/26 to keep drafting quality.
Not sure if we can still get a player in this draft like Scarlett Johnson but she looks a very good player.
Who would you have around our 1st pick?Skepper was pick 17, Peters was 23, Slocombe 26. We won't have to trade anything like that high to get them, which is what makes it such a smart drafting strategy. I'm guessing the club doesn't want four more rookies this draft given how young we already are. Getting players who have at least been pros for 2 years means we aren't quite so inexperienced, but we don't want to be drafting any oldies, either.
Some young players just don't click with what their clubs want, while others like Slocombe are trying to break into the toughest list in the comp, and when there's no injuries, it's nearly impossible. I think with all three of those girls, there's a good chance they'll turn out to be really good in a new team with a new coach. Or maybe not, but it's worth a shot.
I doubt we can get Scarlett Johnson, but it's not impossible... I reckon the fact that we're not scrambling to get a better drafting position means the coaching staff have their eyes on a few players no matter how it works out. They've got a good record lately, I trust them.
Well if you count through RookieMe's top 30 list, remove the GC Academy girls and count the remaining places, we land on Maggie Johnstone, which would be perfect, best choice after Johnson.Who would you have around our 1st pick?
Looks like around 18 or a bit later?
Yeah I agree, I was having a little thought experiment today given the unique position we find ourselves in IE. the Aflw.Dumb article. Experience? Prowse is the most experienced, had four years only. Skepper's had about two years, ditto Peters, ditto Slocombe but she's only played one game.
We're doing the Moneyball strategy - looking for bargains, players who were worth a high pick a few years ago but have slipped a long way through no fault of their own. I reckon the reason we didn't get Prowse or Zanker is because other clubs are throwing much higher draft picks at them, while we want to keep top picks unspent unless someone really great is available.
Big bodied midfielder? We've already got two, but Rentsch and Painter are playing back and forward respectively. So we don't actually want a big bodied midfielder, we want someone like Prowse who can help release Rentsch into the midfield, or a forward who can help Painter do the same.
I like what I'm seeing. A lot of clubs are dumb, they'll spend top picks for older players who'll help in the short term, but leave them struggling in a few years time because they missed out on great young talent to do it. We're going after players with big upsides, looking to create value rather than just harvesting existing value.
Yep. The logic of the AFL doesn't really work in the AFLW. In the AFL, a veteran player is welcomed because there's no drop-off in talent between veterans and kids. But in the AFLW, by getting older players, unless you get a real gun like Hawthorn getting Emily Bates, you're usually getting that experience at a big trade-down for talent.Yeah I agree, I was having a little thought experiment today given the unique position we find ourselves in IE. the Aflw.
Radical thought.... What if we DON'T need to add experience to the team.... Given the upside of the draft crops coming through. What if we KEEP going younger, KEEP prioritising bargain bin first/second round picks not getting a crack at other clubs and hitting the draft HARD.
As you say, and I concur, this will have a negative impact on our immediate success I think, but just imagine when all these 19- 23 year Olds are 23-27 year olds.
I think too often we try to apply Men's league logic to the Women's when it's not a 1:1 comparison.
Either SJ or MJ would give us that uncontested possession we don't get enough of against good teams, especially after Rowley got injured - we're good at driving the ball forward and marking in packs, but the top teams are slick ball movers who don't fumble under pressure, and that's not us. So an ace quality outside ball mover like that would be awesome... and SJ's also a defender, who would help out Rentsch and help her play more midfield minutes.
Well if you count through RookieMe's top 30 list, remove the GC Academy girls and count the remaining places, we land on Maggie Johnstone, which would be perfect, best choice after Johnson.
Either SJ or MJ would give us that uncontested possession we don't get enough of against good teams, especially after Rowley got injured - we're good at driving the ball forward and marking in packs, but the top teams are slick ball movers who don't fumble under pressure, and that's not us. So an ace quality outside ball mover like that would be awesome... and SJ's also a defender, who would help out Rentsch and help her play more midfield minutes.
Eloise Mackereth, super talented tallish forward, could help free Painter up to play more midfield... but she wouldn't help us with uncontested possession. Unless of course she lets Painter play more midfield, and THAT boosts our midfield numbers without hurting our offensive firepower.
Lots of ways to skin it. Fascinated to see what we end up doing.
We should be able to get this done.wakes up praying for news we have secured Ella Slocombe for a bag of chips
(jokes)
KORMEFormer West Coast Eagle and three-time WAFLW Claremont premiership player Kate Orme has been appointed Head Coach of Western Australia’s Female Under 18s and 16s programs for 2026.
Orme will begin the role as State Talent Coach – Female Pathways at WA Football next month
![]()
Ex Eagle Called Up For Major WA Football Role - WA Football
Former West Coast Eagle and three-time WAFLW Claremont premiership player Kate Orme has been appointed Head Coach of Western Australia’s Female Under 18s andwafootball.com.au
Like Daisy said those 2 living togethet is a nightmare xDI'm struggling to find someone who encapsulates "built different" more than Jessica Rentsch. I have been cackling for 10 minutes.View attachment 2490835
They already seem as close as sisters (or lovers) finishing sentences, just all out adoring each other, or giving each other crap.Like Daisy said those 2 living togethet is a nightmare xD