Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 5

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Here is PART 4

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

The Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary and nastiness will be deleted and warnings issued.
 
So you're sticking with the idea these guys are fishermen eh? I think people were running this line in September too until this happened.

when did I say they were fisherman? When did they ditch the legal system and just start blowing people up without trial? Are police allowed to go up to drug pushers on the streets and put a gun to their head and pull the trigger?
 
when did I say they were fisherman? When did they ditch the legal system and just start blowing people up without trial? Are police allowed to go up to drug pushers on the streets and put a gun to their head and pull the trigger?

sockpuppet.jpg

You realise I was replying to faible yeah?

Make sure you log into the correct account next time.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

So you're sticking with the idea these guys are fishermen eh?

Nope. It's pretty clear what I said:

I know you live in backwards world where people are convicted without proof or due process

Soldier of Misfortune picked that up pretty quickly too:

When did they ditch the legal system and just start blowing people up without trial? Are police allowed to go up to drug pushers on the streets and put a gun to their head and pull the trigger?

Trump is a convicted sex offender. But you're fine with that.
 
:roflv1:

You realise Obama's drone strike killed kids yeah? In fact his first strike in Yemen is indicative of how badly targeted his strikes were. Missed Al Quaeda altogether and hit a tribe instead, killing 55 people. 21 of them were kids and 10 of those were under 5. Also killed 12 women, 5 of whom were pregnant.

The fact that you're comparing drug traffickers to those casualties just reveals how far gone you are. Killing shipwrecked drug traffickers in a second strike is not ideal but whose lives are more important? Drug traffickers, the people who would have been killed by the drugs they were transporting or the kids and pregnant women Obama droned?
Geez you're really gonna freak out when you realise that Trump increased Obama's drone usage and resulting civilian deaths. Well, before he nixed the rules about reporting on civilian deaths, of course.


But sure, MAGA cares deeply about bombed brown children, very convincing mate 🤡:tearsofjoy:

Still, you were at least able to manage stating that re-bombing shipwrecked survivors "isn't ideal". Underselling an illegal action as confirmed in their own military regs and probably a war crime somewhat, but better than anything Lebbo will be able to manage.
 
Last edited:
So you're sticking with the idea these guys are fishermen eh? I think people were running this line in September too until this happened.

No he's sticking with the idea that no one knows if they are or they aren't. Better bomb them anyway, just to be safe, even though we know the drugs onboard aren't coming to America :drunk:

Just listen to yourself, the above is literally the logic you're subscribing to. What a great way to run a country.

Trump has broken you mate, utterly and completely. Not that you're on your own.
 
Last edited:
do you think I'm faible?
He's just flailing around to avoid the question about police extrajudicially executing suspected drug dealers.

Its really all he does when you break it down - deflect, avoid, mitigate and obfuscate for dear leader. I've said to him before I truly hope someone is slinging him a few rubles for the effort, imagine debasing yourself like this for free :oops:
 
He's just flailing around to avoid the question about police extrajudicially executing suspected drug dealers.

Its really all he does when you break it down - deflect, avoid, mitigate and obfuscate for dear leader. I've said to him before I truly hope someone is slinging him a few rubles for the effort, imagine debasing yourself like this for free :oops:
that would explain it a little better than simple mental illness. Why on earth would somebody create a second account like mine with posts on the heavy metal forum to muddy the waters and conceal some hidden truth? Lol.
 
No he's sticking with the idea that no one knows if they are or they aren't. Better bomb them anyway, just to be safe, even though we know if there are drugs onboard they aren't coming to America :drunk:

Just listen to yourself, the above is literally the logic you're subscribing to. What a great way to run a country.

Trump has broken you mate, utterly and completely. Not that you're on your own.

:roflv1: 🤣

I'm sure the Navy does but I will agree that you guys definitely have no clue (and didn't in September when many of you in this thread were running with the idea that the people on a boat bombed back then were either fishermen or immigrants). No mea culpa's I noticed when drugs were recovered from the wrecked boat in question. :$
 
:roflv1: 🤣

I'm sure the Navy does but sure, you guys definitely don't know (and didn't in September when many of you in this thread were running with the idea that the people on a boat bombed back then were either fishermen or immigrants). No mea culpa's I noticed when drugs were recovered from the wrecked boat in question. :$
So you're saying the US military is 100% reliable in terms of identifying and carrying out strikes on legitimate targets, if we were to deem low level drug runners as legitimate targets to be killed?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

So you're saying the US military is 100% reliable in terms of identifying and carrying out strikes on legitimate targets, if we were to deem low level drug runners as legitimate targets to be killed?

The target is the boat. Not the drug runners. If they stay on the boat after a first strike trying to recover some of the drugs for instance rather than realising the boat could still be a target if it wasn't properly destroyed, then they made a bad choice just like they did when they first boarded the boat.
 
The target is the boat. Not the drug runners. If they stay on the boat after a first strike trying to recover some of the drugs for instance rather than realising the boat could still be a target if it wasn't properly destroyed, then they made a bad choice just like they did when they first boarded the boat.
hahahahahahahahahaha. Where in international waters do you think they should have headed instead? THINK! You still haven't answered if it is a good idea for police to be able to point blank shoot drug dealers in America without a trial?
 
The target is the boat. Not the drug runners. If they stay on the boat after a first strike trying to recover some of the drugs for instance rather than realising the boat could still be a target if it wasn't properly destroyed, then they made a bad choice just like they did when they first boarded the boat.

You're describing murder. You're supporting murder.

Much the same way you support a sex offender.
 
hahahahahahahahahaha. Where in international waters do you think they should have headed instead? THINK!

🤣 :roflv1:

How about a safe distance away from the boat for a start in case the Navy decided to blow it up properly?
THINK!


You still haven't answered if it is a good idea for police to be able to point blank shoot drug dealers in America without a trial?

Apologies. I took your question to be either performative or rhetorical. No it's not a good idea. Then again, that's just my view. Ask a few people who have lost loved ones to the drug trade and they might give you a slightly different answer.
 
🤣 :roflv1:

How about a safe distance away from the boat for a start in case the Navy decided to blow it up properly?
THINK!




Apologies. I took your question to be either performative or rhetorical. No it's not a good idea. Then again, that's just my view. Ask a few people who have lost loved ones to the drug trade and they might give you a slightly different answer.
Kid, I've lost people to drugs, it's ugly and depressing. Murder doesn't get condoned though. So you think they should have treaded water away from the boat for how long before they believe that there isn't going to be a second strike? THINK. Seriously, do you know what's out there? Water. Lots of it. Nothing else. So you'd cling to whatever's still floating. Seriously, try thinking.

Also, why do you give boat drug dealers instant death sentence but not street drug dealers who are RIGHT THERE doing it?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Kid, I've lost people to drugs, it's ugly and depressing. Murder doesn't get condoned though. So you think they should have treaded water away from the boat for how long before they believe that there isn't going to be a second strike? THINK. Seriously, do you know what's out there? Water. Lots of it. Nothing else. So you'd cling to whatever's still floating. Seriously, try thinking.

Also, why do you give boat drug dealers instant death sentence but not street drug dealers who are RIGHT THERE doing it?

I think in these situations, you need to take the advice of Trump himself

“I say, what would happen if the boat sank from its weight, and you’re in the boat, and you have this tremendously powerful battery, and the battery is now underwater. And there’s a shark that’s approximately 10 yards over there,” …
“By the way, lot of shark attacks lately, I watched some guys justifying it today. ‘Well, they weren’t really that angry. They bit off the young lady’s leg because of the fact that they were, they were not hungry, but they misunderstood who she was,” Trump added. “He said ‘there’s no problem with sharks, they just didn’t really understand a young woman’s swimming. She really got decimated and other people too, a lot of shark attacks.”
… “So I said, there’s a shark 10 yards away from the boat, do I get electrocuted? If the boat is sinking, water goes over the battery, the boat is sinking, do I stay on top of the boat and get electrocuted? Or do I jump over by the shark and not get electrocuted?
“Because I will tell you he didn’t know the answer. He said, ‘you know, nobody’s ever asked me that question.’ I said I think it’s a good question. I think there’s a lot of electric current coming to that water. But you know what I’d do? If there was a shark or you get electrocuted, I’ll take electrocution every single time. I’m not getting near the shark.”
 
Kid, I've lost people to drugs, it's ugly and depressing. Murder doesn't get condoned though. So you think they should have treaded water away from the boat for how long before they believe that there isn't going to be a second strike? THINK. Seriously, do you know what's out there? Water. Lots of it. Nothing else. So you'd cling to whatever's still floating. Seriously, try thinking.

How long? It depends on what time of night the strike was. If I couldn't find a smaller piece of floating wreckage immediately after the first strike I'd be waiting for first light to see if that would help me do so rather than clinging to a boat that could still be a target because of the drugs on board.

The navy rescued two survivors who clung to a life raft away from their stricken vessel in October.

Also, why do you give boat drug dealers instant death sentence but not street drug dealers who are RIGHT THERE doing it?

These guys have been warned that if they choose to board a drug boat they're riding a deadly target. They are designated narco terrorists. The situation is different. Back later. got stuff to do. Enjoy playing charades while I'm gone. :grinv1:
 
How long? It depends on what time of night the strike was. If I couldn't find a smaller piece of floating wreckage immediately after the first strike I'd be waiting for first light to see if that would help me do so rather than clinging to a boat that could still be a target because of the drugs on board.

The navy rescued two survivors who clung to a life raft away from their stricken vessel in October.



These guys have been warned that if they choose to board a drug boat they're riding a deadly target. They are designated narco terrorists. The situation is different. Back later. got stuff to do. Enjoy playing charades while I'm gone. :grinv1:
how is the situation different? Why is one a death sentence but the other is not? Do you think both should be death sentences without trial or neither?
 
I'm sure the Navy does
The navy aren't assuring us they're all drug runners, they just follow orders as I believe Trump has been very clear on lately. The Trump admin are the ones telling us - a great and unblemished record of unwavering honesty there :tearsofjoy:

That you'd have to be crazy to take their word for anything at this point in time is an issue they have created, no one else.

No mea culpa's I noticed when drugs were recovered from the wrecked boat in question. :$
The drugs were recovered? News to me, that would at least offer some confirmation, link us up.
 
Ask a few people who have lost loved ones to the drug trade and they might give you a slightly different answer.
Confirmed drug dealers, sure, a few might be in favour of that.

Bolded being the point you're either unable to grasp or are willfully ignoring.

And thats before you even get to the issues that the drugs in question have nothing to do with America, aren't going there, and its cocaine not fentanyl. The supposed rationale has more holes than swiss cheese at this point but here you are clapping along like a trained seal anyway :drunk:
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 5

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top